Cargando…

Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits

BACKGROUND: Age and rate of acoustic stimulation affect peak latencies in brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) in humans. Those effects are unknown in foals. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to (1) establish reference values for BAER in foals by using 3 different stimulation protocols, (2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lecoq, L., Gains, M., Blond, L., Parent, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25619523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12499
_version_ 1782430750957633536
author Lecoq, L.
Gains, M.
Blond, L.
Parent, J.
author_facet Lecoq, L.
Gains, M.
Blond, L.
Parent, J.
author_sort Lecoq, L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Age and rate of acoustic stimulation affect peak latencies in brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) in humans. Those effects are unknown in foals. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to (1) establish reference values for BAER in foals by using 3 different stimulation protocols, (2) evaluate the effects of age and stimulation frequencies on BAER tracing in foals up to 6 months old, and (3) compare the data with BAER obtained from foals with central nervous system (CNS) disorders. ANIMALS: Thirty‐nine neurologically normal foals and 16 foals with neurologic diseases. METHODS: Prospective observational clinical study. BAER recorded by using 3 protocols of stimulation (11.33 repetitions per second [Hz]/70 decibel normal hearing level [dBNHL]; 11.33 Hz/90 dBNHL; 90 Hz/70 dBNHL). RESULTS: No effect of age was observed in normal foals (P > .005). No significant difference was observed for latencies and interpeak latencies (IPL) when comparing foals with neurologic diseases and normal foals (P > .05), but 78.6% of foals with neurologic diseases had an asymmetry in their tracing, reflecting a difference in conduction time between the left and right side of the brainstem. Increasing the stimulation rate did not improve detection of CNS disorders. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: We propose BAER reference values for foals up to 6 months of age by using 3 protocols. Most foals with neurologic deficits had abnormal BAER tracing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4858096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48580962016-06-22 Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits Lecoq, L. Gains, M. Blond, L. Parent, J. J Vet Intern Med Standard Articles BACKGROUND: Age and rate of acoustic stimulation affect peak latencies in brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) in humans. Those effects are unknown in foals. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to (1) establish reference values for BAER in foals by using 3 different stimulation protocols, (2) evaluate the effects of age and stimulation frequencies on BAER tracing in foals up to 6 months old, and (3) compare the data with BAER obtained from foals with central nervous system (CNS) disorders. ANIMALS: Thirty‐nine neurologically normal foals and 16 foals with neurologic diseases. METHODS: Prospective observational clinical study. BAER recorded by using 3 protocols of stimulation (11.33 repetitions per second [Hz]/70 decibel normal hearing level [dBNHL]; 11.33 Hz/90 dBNHL; 90 Hz/70 dBNHL). RESULTS: No effect of age was observed in normal foals (P > .005). No significant difference was observed for latencies and interpeak latencies (IPL) when comparing foals with neurologic diseases and normal foals (P > .05), but 78.6% of foals with neurologic diseases had an asymmetry in their tracing, reflecting a difference in conduction time between the left and right side of the brainstem. Increasing the stimulation rate did not improve detection of CNS disorders. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: We propose BAER reference values for foals up to 6 months of age by using 3 protocols. Most foals with neurologic deficits had abnormal BAER tracing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-01-25 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4858096/ /pubmed/25619523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12499 Text en Copyright © 2015 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine
spellingShingle Standard Articles
Lecoq, L.
Gains, M.
Blond, L.
Parent, J.
Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits
title Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits
title_full Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits
title_fullStr Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits
title_full_unstemmed Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits
title_short Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits
title_sort brainstem auditory evoked responses in foals: reference values, effect of age, rate of acoustic stimulation, and neurologic deficits
topic Standard Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25619523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12499
work_keys_str_mv AT lecoql brainstemauditoryevokedresponsesinfoalsreferencevalueseffectofagerateofacousticstimulationandneurologicdeficits
AT gainsm brainstemauditoryevokedresponsesinfoalsreferencevalueseffectofagerateofacousticstimulationandneurologicdeficits
AT blondl brainstemauditoryevokedresponsesinfoalsreferencevalueseffectofagerateofacousticstimulationandneurologicdeficits
AT parentj brainstemauditoryevokedresponsesinfoalsreferencevalueseffectofagerateofacousticstimulationandneurologicdeficits