Cargando…
Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits
BACKGROUND: Age and rate of acoustic stimulation affect peak latencies in brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) in humans. Those effects are unknown in foals. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to (1) establish reference values for BAER in foals by using 3 different stimulation protocols, (2...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25619523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12499 |
_version_ | 1782430750957633536 |
---|---|
author | Lecoq, L. Gains, M. Blond, L. Parent, J. |
author_facet | Lecoq, L. Gains, M. Blond, L. Parent, J. |
author_sort | Lecoq, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Age and rate of acoustic stimulation affect peak latencies in brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) in humans. Those effects are unknown in foals. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to (1) establish reference values for BAER in foals by using 3 different stimulation protocols, (2) evaluate the effects of age and stimulation frequencies on BAER tracing in foals up to 6 months old, and (3) compare the data with BAER obtained from foals with central nervous system (CNS) disorders. ANIMALS: Thirty‐nine neurologically normal foals and 16 foals with neurologic diseases. METHODS: Prospective observational clinical study. BAER recorded by using 3 protocols of stimulation (11.33 repetitions per second [Hz]/70 decibel normal hearing level [dBNHL]; 11.33 Hz/90 dBNHL; 90 Hz/70 dBNHL). RESULTS: No effect of age was observed in normal foals (P > .005). No significant difference was observed for latencies and interpeak latencies (IPL) when comparing foals with neurologic diseases and normal foals (P > .05), but 78.6% of foals with neurologic diseases had an asymmetry in their tracing, reflecting a difference in conduction time between the left and right side of the brainstem. Increasing the stimulation rate did not improve detection of CNS disorders. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: We propose BAER reference values for foals up to 6 months of age by using 3 protocols. Most foals with neurologic deficits had abnormal BAER tracing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4858096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48580962016-06-22 Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits Lecoq, L. Gains, M. Blond, L. Parent, J. J Vet Intern Med Standard Articles BACKGROUND: Age and rate of acoustic stimulation affect peak latencies in brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) in humans. Those effects are unknown in foals. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to (1) establish reference values for BAER in foals by using 3 different stimulation protocols, (2) evaluate the effects of age and stimulation frequencies on BAER tracing in foals up to 6 months old, and (3) compare the data with BAER obtained from foals with central nervous system (CNS) disorders. ANIMALS: Thirty‐nine neurologically normal foals and 16 foals with neurologic diseases. METHODS: Prospective observational clinical study. BAER recorded by using 3 protocols of stimulation (11.33 repetitions per second [Hz]/70 decibel normal hearing level [dBNHL]; 11.33 Hz/90 dBNHL; 90 Hz/70 dBNHL). RESULTS: No effect of age was observed in normal foals (P > .005). No significant difference was observed for latencies and interpeak latencies (IPL) when comparing foals with neurologic diseases and normal foals (P > .05), but 78.6% of foals with neurologic diseases had an asymmetry in their tracing, reflecting a difference in conduction time between the left and right side of the brainstem. Increasing the stimulation rate did not improve detection of CNS disorders. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: We propose BAER reference values for foals up to 6 months of age by using 3 protocols. Most foals with neurologic deficits had abnormal BAER tracing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-01-25 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4858096/ /pubmed/25619523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12499 Text en Copyright © 2015 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine |
spellingShingle | Standard Articles Lecoq, L. Gains, M. Blond, L. Parent, J. Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits |
title | Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits |
title_full | Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits |
title_fullStr | Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits |
title_full_unstemmed | Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits |
title_short | Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Foals: Reference Values, Effect of Age, Rate of Acoustic Stimulation, and Neurologic Deficits |
title_sort | brainstem auditory evoked responses in foals: reference values, effect of age, rate of acoustic stimulation, and neurologic deficits |
topic | Standard Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25619523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12499 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lecoql brainstemauditoryevokedresponsesinfoalsreferencevalueseffectofagerateofacousticstimulationandneurologicdeficits AT gainsm brainstemauditoryevokedresponsesinfoalsreferencevalueseffectofagerateofacousticstimulationandneurologicdeficits AT blondl brainstemauditoryevokedresponsesinfoalsreferencevalueseffectofagerateofacousticstimulationandneurologicdeficits AT parentj brainstemauditoryevokedresponsesinfoalsreferencevalueseffectofagerateofacousticstimulationandneurologicdeficits |