Cargando…

Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores

BACKGROUND: The CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores are usually applied for stroke prediction in atrial fibrillation patients, and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) is a commonly used scale for assessing morbidity. The role in assessing mortality with score system in hemodialysis is not clear and compariso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Hsun, Chen, Yi-Hsin, Hsieh, Teng-Fu, Chuang, Shiun-Yang, Wu, Ming-Ju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27148867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154627
_version_ 1782430780074491904
author Yang, Hsun
Chen, Yi-Hsin
Hsieh, Teng-Fu
Chuang, Shiun-Yang
Wu, Ming-Ju
author_facet Yang, Hsun
Chen, Yi-Hsin
Hsieh, Teng-Fu
Chuang, Shiun-Yang
Wu, Ming-Ju
author_sort Yang, Hsun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores are usually applied for stroke prediction in atrial fibrillation patients, and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) is a commonly used scale for assessing morbidity. The role in assessing mortality with score system in hemodialysis is not clear and comparisons are lacking. We aimed at evaluating CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI scores to predict mortality in incident hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Using data from the Nation Health Insurance system of Taiwan (NHIRD) from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2009, individuals ≧20 y/o who began hemodialysis identified by procedure code and receiving dialysis for > 3 months were included for our study. Renal transplantation patients after dialysis or PD patients were excluded. We calculated the CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI score according to the ICD-9 code and categorized the patients into three groups in each system: 0–1, 2–3, over 4. A total of 3046 incident hemodialysis patients enrolled from NHIRD were examined for an association between the separate scoring systems (CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI score) and mortality. RESULTS: CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores revealed good predictive value for total mortality (CHADS2 AUC = 0.805; CHA2DS2 AUC = 0.790). However, the CCI score did not reveal a similarly satisfying result (AUC = 0.576). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores can be applied for mortality prediction in incident hemodialysis patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4858249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48582492016-05-13 Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores Yang, Hsun Chen, Yi-Hsin Hsieh, Teng-Fu Chuang, Shiun-Yang Wu, Ming-Ju PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores are usually applied for stroke prediction in atrial fibrillation patients, and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) is a commonly used scale for assessing morbidity. The role in assessing mortality with score system in hemodialysis is not clear and comparisons are lacking. We aimed at evaluating CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI scores to predict mortality in incident hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Using data from the Nation Health Insurance system of Taiwan (NHIRD) from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2009, individuals ≧20 y/o who began hemodialysis identified by procedure code and receiving dialysis for > 3 months were included for our study. Renal transplantation patients after dialysis or PD patients were excluded. We calculated the CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI score according to the ICD-9 code and categorized the patients into three groups in each system: 0–1, 2–3, over 4. A total of 3046 incident hemodialysis patients enrolled from NHIRD were examined for an association between the separate scoring systems (CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI score) and mortality. RESULTS: CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores revealed good predictive value for total mortality (CHADS2 AUC = 0.805; CHA2DS2 AUC = 0.790). However, the CCI score did not reveal a similarly satisfying result (AUC = 0.576). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores can be applied for mortality prediction in incident hemodialysis patients. Public Library of Science 2016-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4858249/ /pubmed/27148867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154627 Text en © 2016 Yang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Hsun
Chen, Yi-Hsin
Hsieh, Teng-Fu
Chuang, Shiun-Yang
Wu, Ming-Ju
Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores
title Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores
title_full Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores
title_fullStr Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores
title_short Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores
title_sort prediction of mortality in incident hemodialysis patients: a validation and comparison of chads2, cha2ds2, and cci scores
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27148867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154627
work_keys_str_mv AT yanghsun predictionofmortalityinincidenthemodialysispatientsavalidationandcomparisonofchads2cha2ds2andcciscores
AT chenyihsin predictionofmortalityinincidenthemodialysispatientsavalidationandcomparisonofchads2cha2ds2andcciscores
AT hsiehtengfu predictionofmortalityinincidenthemodialysispatientsavalidationandcomparisonofchads2cha2ds2andcciscores
AT chuangshiunyang predictionofmortalityinincidenthemodialysispatientsavalidationandcomparisonofchads2cha2ds2andcciscores
AT wumingju predictionofmortalityinincidenthemodialysispatientsavalidationandcomparisonofchads2cha2ds2andcciscores