Cargando…
Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores
BACKGROUND: The CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores are usually applied for stroke prediction in atrial fibrillation patients, and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) is a commonly used scale for assessing morbidity. The role in assessing mortality with score system in hemodialysis is not clear and compariso...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27148867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154627 |
_version_ | 1782430780074491904 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Hsun Chen, Yi-Hsin Hsieh, Teng-Fu Chuang, Shiun-Yang Wu, Ming-Ju |
author_facet | Yang, Hsun Chen, Yi-Hsin Hsieh, Teng-Fu Chuang, Shiun-Yang Wu, Ming-Ju |
author_sort | Yang, Hsun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores are usually applied for stroke prediction in atrial fibrillation patients, and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) is a commonly used scale for assessing morbidity. The role in assessing mortality with score system in hemodialysis is not clear and comparisons are lacking. We aimed at evaluating CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI scores to predict mortality in incident hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Using data from the Nation Health Insurance system of Taiwan (NHIRD) from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2009, individuals ≧20 y/o who began hemodialysis identified by procedure code and receiving dialysis for > 3 months were included for our study. Renal transplantation patients after dialysis or PD patients were excluded. We calculated the CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI score according to the ICD-9 code and categorized the patients into three groups in each system: 0–1, 2–3, over 4. A total of 3046 incident hemodialysis patients enrolled from NHIRD were examined for an association between the separate scoring systems (CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI score) and mortality. RESULTS: CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores revealed good predictive value for total mortality (CHADS2 AUC = 0.805; CHA2DS2 AUC = 0.790). However, the CCI score did not reveal a similarly satisfying result (AUC = 0.576). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores can be applied for mortality prediction in incident hemodialysis patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4858249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48582492016-05-13 Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores Yang, Hsun Chen, Yi-Hsin Hsieh, Teng-Fu Chuang, Shiun-Yang Wu, Ming-Ju PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores are usually applied for stroke prediction in atrial fibrillation patients, and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) is a commonly used scale for assessing morbidity. The role in assessing mortality with score system in hemodialysis is not clear and comparisons are lacking. We aimed at evaluating CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI scores to predict mortality in incident hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Using data from the Nation Health Insurance system of Taiwan (NHIRD) from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2009, individuals ≧20 y/o who began hemodialysis identified by procedure code and receiving dialysis for > 3 months were included for our study. Renal transplantation patients after dialysis or PD patients were excluded. We calculated the CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI score according to the ICD-9 code and categorized the patients into three groups in each system: 0–1, 2–3, over 4. A total of 3046 incident hemodialysis patients enrolled from NHIRD were examined for an association between the separate scoring systems (CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI score) and mortality. RESULTS: CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores revealed good predictive value for total mortality (CHADS2 AUC = 0.805; CHA2DS2 AUC = 0.790). However, the CCI score did not reveal a similarly satisfying result (AUC = 0.576). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that CHADS2 and CHA2DS2 scores can be applied for mortality prediction in incident hemodialysis patients. Public Library of Science 2016-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4858249/ /pubmed/27148867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154627 Text en © 2016 Yang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Hsun Chen, Yi-Hsin Hsieh, Teng-Fu Chuang, Shiun-Yang Wu, Ming-Ju Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores |
title | Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores |
title_full | Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores |
title_fullStr | Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores |
title_short | Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores |
title_sort | prediction of mortality in incident hemodialysis patients: a validation and comparison of chads2, cha2ds2, and cci scores |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27148867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanghsun predictionofmortalityinincidenthemodialysispatientsavalidationandcomparisonofchads2cha2ds2andcciscores AT chenyihsin predictionofmortalityinincidenthemodialysispatientsavalidationandcomparisonofchads2cha2ds2andcciscores AT hsiehtengfu predictionofmortalityinincidenthemodialysispatientsavalidationandcomparisonofchads2cha2ds2andcciscores AT chuangshiunyang predictionofmortalityinincidenthemodialysispatientsavalidationandcomparisonofchads2cha2ds2andcciscores AT wumingju predictionofmortalityinincidenthemodialysispatientsavalidationandcomparisonofchads2cha2ds2andcciscores |