Cargando…

The Impact of Language Opacity and Proficiency on Reading Strategies in Bilinguals: An Eye Movement Study

Reading strategies vary across languages according to orthographic depth – the complexity of the grapheme in relation to phoneme conversion rules – notably at the level of eye movement patterns. We recently demonstrated that a group of early bilinguals, who learned both languages equally under the a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de León Rodríguez, Diego, Buetler, Karin A., Eggenberger, Noëmi, Laganaro, Marina, Nyffeler, Thomas, Annoni, Jean-Marie, Müri, René M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27199870
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00649
_version_ 1782430828809158656
author de León Rodríguez, Diego
Buetler, Karin A.
Eggenberger, Noëmi
Laganaro, Marina
Nyffeler, Thomas
Annoni, Jean-Marie
Müri, René M.
author_facet de León Rodríguez, Diego
Buetler, Karin A.
Eggenberger, Noëmi
Laganaro, Marina
Nyffeler, Thomas
Annoni, Jean-Marie
Müri, René M.
author_sort de León Rodríguez, Diego
collection PubMed
description Reading strategies vary across languages according to orthographic depth – the complexity of the grapheme in relation to phoneme conversion rules – notably at the level of eye movement patterns. We recently demonstrated that a group of early bilinguals, who learned both languages equally under the age of seven, presented a first fixation location (FFL) closer to the beginning of words when reading in German as compared with French. Since German is known to be orthographically more transparent than French, this suggested that different strategies were being engaged depending on the orthographic depth of the used language. Opaque languages induce a global reading strategy, and transparent languages force a local/serial strategy. Thus, pseudo-words were processed using a local strategy in both languages, suggesting that the link between word forms and their lexical representation may also play a role in selecting a specific strategy. In order to test whether corresponding effects appear in late bilinguals with low proficiency in their second language (L2), we present a new study in which we recorded eye movements while two groups of late German–French and French–German bilinguals read aloud isolated French and German words and pseudo-words. Since, a transparent reading strategy is local and serial, with a high number of fixations per stimuli, and the level of the bilingual participants’ L2 is low, the impact of language opacity should be observed in L1. We therefore predicted a global reading strategy if the bilinguals’ L1 was French (FFL close to the middle of the stimuli with fewer fixations per stimuli) and a local and serial reading strategy if it was German. Thus, the L2 of each group, as well as pseudo-words, should also require a local and serial reading strategy. Our results confirmed these hypotheses, suggesting that global word processing is only achieved by bilinguals with an opaque L1 when reading in an opaque language; the low level in the L2 gives way to a local and serial reading strategy. These findings stress the fact that reading behavior is influenced not only by the linguistic mode but also by top–down factors, such as readers’ proficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4858600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48586002016-05-19 The Impact of Language Opacity and Proficiency on Reading Strategies in Bilinguals: An Eye Movement Study de León Rodríguez, Diego Buetler, Karin A. Eggenberger, Noëmi Laganaro, Marina Nyffeler, Thomas Annoni, Jean-Marie Müri, René M. Front Psychol Psychology Reading strategies vary across languages according to orthographic depth – the complexity of the grapheme in relation to phoneme conversion rules – notably at the level of eye movement patterns. We recently demonstrated that a group of early bilinguals, who learned both languages equally under the age of seven, presented a first fixation location (FFL) closer to the beginning of words when reading in German as compared with French. Since German is known to be orthographically more transparent than French, this suggested that different strategies were being engaged depending on the orthographic depth of the used language. Opaque languages induce a global reading strategy, and transparent languages force a local/serial strategy. Thus, pseudo-words were processed using a local strategy in both languages, suggesting that the link between word forms and their lexical representation may also play a role in selecting a specific strategy. In order to test whether corresponding effects appear in late bilinguals with low proficiency in their second language (L2), we present a new study in which we recorded eye movements while two groups of late German–French and French–German bilinguals read aloud isolated French and German words and pseudo-words. Since, a transparent reading strategy is local and serial, with a high number of fixations per stimuli, and the level of the bilingual participants’ L2 is low, the impact of language opacity should be observed in L1. We therefore predicted a global reading strategy if the bilinguals’ L1 was French (FFL close to the middle of the stimuli with fewer fixations per stimuli) and a local and serial reading strategy if it was German. Thus, the L2 of each group, as well as pseudo-words, should also require a local and serial reading strategy. Our results confirmed these hypotheses, suggesting that global word processing is only achieved by bilinguals with an opaque L1 when reading in an opaque language; the low level in the L2 gives way to a local and serial reading strategy. These findings stress the fact that reading behavior is influenced not only by the linguistic mode but also by top–down factors, such as readers’ proficiency. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4858600/ /pubmed/27199870 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00649 Text en Copyright © 2016 de León Rodríguez, Buetler, Eggenberger, Laganaro, Nyffeler, Annoni and Müri. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
de León Rodríguez, Diego
Buetler, Karin A.
Eggenberger, Noëmi
Laganaro, Marina
Nyffeler, Thomas
Annoni, Jean-Marie
Müri, René M.
The Impact of Language Opacity and Proficiency on Reading Strategies in Bilinguals: An Eye Movement Study
title The Impact of Language Opacity and Proficiency on Reading Strategies in Bilinguals: An Eye Movement Study
title_full The Impact of Language Opacity and Proficiency on Reading Strategies in Bilinguals: An Eye Movement Study
title_fullStr The Impact of Language Opacity and Proficiency on Reading Strategies in Bilinguals: An Eye Movement Study
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Language Opacity and Proficiency on Reading Strategies in Bilinguals: An Eye Movement Study
title_short The Impact of Language Opacity and Proficiency on Reading Strategies in Bilinguals: An Eye Movement Study
title_sort impact of language opacity and proficiency on reading strategies in bilinguals: an eye movement study
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27199870
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00649
work_keys_str_mv AT deleonrodriguezdiego theimpactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy
AT buetlerkarina theimpactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy
AT eggenbergernoemi theimpactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy
AT laganaromarina theimpactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy
AT nyffelerthomas theimpactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy
AT annonijeanmarie theimpactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy
AT murirenem theimpactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy
AT deleonrodriguezdiego impactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy
AT buetlerkarina impactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy
AT eggenbergernoemi impactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy
AT laganaromarina impactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy
AT nyffelerthomas impactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy
AT annonijeanmarie impactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy
AT murirenem impactoflanguageopacityandproficiencyonreadingstrategiesinbilingualsaneyemovementstudy