Cargando…
The impact of “early” versus “late” initiation of renal replacement therapy in critical care patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and evidence synthesis
BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of initiating renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critical illness complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI) is not clearly established. Trials completed on this topic have been marked by contradictory findings as well as quality and heterogeneity issues. Our goal was to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27149861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1291-8 |
_version_ | 1782430860973178880 |
---|---|
author | Wierstra, Benjamin T. Kadri, Sameer Alomar, Soha Burbano, Ximena Barrisford, Glen W. Kao, Raymond L. C. |
author_facet | Wierstra, Benjamin T. Kadri, Sameer Alomar, Soha Burbano, Ximena Barrisford, Glen W. Kao, Raymond L. C. |
author_sort | Wierstra, Benjamin T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of initiating renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critical illness complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI) is not clearly established. Trials completed on this topic have been marked by contradictory findings as well as quality and heterogeneity issues. Our goal was to perform a synthesis of the evidence regarding the impact of “early” versus “late” RRT in critically ill patients with AKI, focusing on the highest-quality research on this topic. METHODS: A literature search using the PubMed and Embase databases was completed to identify studies involving critically ill adult patients with AKI who received hemodialysis according to “early” versus “late”/“standard” criteria. The highest-quality studies were selected for meta-analysis. The primary outcome of interest was mortality at 1 month (composite of 28- and 30-day mortality). Secondary outcomes evaluated included intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Thirty-six studies (seven randomized controlled trials, ten prospective cohorts, and nineteen retrospective cohorts) were identified for detailed evaluation. Nine studies involving 1042 patients were considered to be of high quality and were included for quantitative analysis. No survival advantage was found with “early” RRT among high-quality studies with an OR of 0.665 (95 % CI 0.384–1.153, p = 0.146). Subgroup analysis by reason for ICU admission (surgical/medical) or definition of “early” (time/biochemical) showed no evidence of survival advantage. No significant differences were observed in ICU or hospital LOS among high-quality studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our conclusion based on this evidence synthesis is that “early” initiation of RRT in critical illness complicated by AKI does not improve patient survival or confer reductions in ICU or hospital LOS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1291-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4858821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48588212016-05-07 The impact of “early” versus “late” initiation of renal replacement therapy in critical care patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and evidence synthesis Wierstra, Benjamin T. Kadri, Sameer Alomar, Soha Burbano, Ximena Barrisford, Glen W. Kao, Raymond L. C. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of initiating renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critical illness complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI) is not clearly established. Trials completed on this topic have been marked by contradictory findings as well as quality and heterogeneity issues. Our goal was to perform a synthesis of the evidence regarding the impact of “early” versus “late” RRT in critically ill patients with AKI, focusing on the highest-quality research on this topic. METHODS: A literature search using the PubMed and Embase databases was completed to identify studies involving critically ill adult patients with AKI who received hemodialysis according to “early” versus “late”/“standard” criteria. The highest-quality studies were selected for meta-analysis. The primary outcome of interest was mortality at 1 month (composite of 28- and 30-day mortality). Secondary outcomes evaluated included intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Thirty-six studies (seven randomized controlled trials, ten prospective cohorts, and nineteen retrospective cohorts) were identified for detailed evaluation. Nine studies involving 1042 patients were considered to be of high quality and were included for quantitative analysis. No survival advantage was found with “early” RRT among high-quality studies with an OR of 0.665 (95 % CI 0.384–1.153, p = 0.146). Subgroup analysis by reason for ICU admission (surgical/medical) or definition of “early” (time/biochemical) showed no evidence of survival advantage. No significant differences were observed in ICU or hospital LOS among high-quality studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our conclusion based on this evidence synthesis is that “early” initiation of RRT in critical illness complicated by AKI does not improve patient survival or confer reductions in ICU or hospital LOS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1291-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-05-06 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4858821/ /pubmed/27149861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1291-8 Text en © Wierstra et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Wierstra, Benjamin T. Kadri, Sameer Alomar, Soha Burbano, Ximena Barrisford, Glen W. Kao, Raymond L. C. The impact of “early” versus “late” initiation of renal replacement therapy in critical care patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and evidence synthesis |
title | The impact of “early” versus “late” initiation of renal replacement therapy in critical care patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and evidence synthesis |
title_full | The impact of “early” versus “late” initiation of renal replacement therapy in critical care patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and evidence synthesis |
title_fullStr | The impact of “early” versus “late” initiation of renal replacement therapy in critical care patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and evidence synthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of “early” versus “late” initiation of renal replacement therapy in critical care patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and evidence synthesis |
title_short | The impact of “early” versus “late” initiation of renal replacement therapy in critical care patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and evidence synthesis |
title_sort | impact of “early” versus “late” initiation of renal replacement therapy in critical care patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and evidence synthesis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27149861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1291-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wierstrabenjamint theimpactofearlyversuslateinitiationofrenalreplacementtherapyincriticalcarepatientswithacutekidneyinjuryasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesis AT kadrisameer theimpactofearlyversuslateinitiationofrenalreplacementtherapyincriticalcarepatientswithacutekidneyinjuryasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesis AT alomarsoha theimpactofearlyversuslateinitiationofrenalreplacementtherapyincriticalcarepatientswithacutekidneyinjuryasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesis AT burbanoximena theimpactofearlyversuslateinitiationofrenalreplacementtherapyincriticalcarepatientswithacutekidneyinjuryasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesis AT barrisfordglenw theimpactofearlyversuslateinitiationofrenalreplacementtherapyincriticalcarepatientswithacutekidneyinjuryasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesis AT kaoraymondlc theimpactofearlyversuslateinitiationofrenalreplacementtherapyincriticalcarepatientswithacutekidneyinjuryasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesis AT wierstrabenjamint impactofearlyversuslateinitiationofrenalreplacementtherapyincriticalcarepatientswithacutekidneyinjuryasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesis AT kadrisameer impactofearlyversuslateinitiationofrenalreplacementtherapyincriticalcarepatientswithacutekidneyinjuryasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesis AT alomarsoha impactofearlyversuslateinitiationofrenalreplacementtherapyincriticalcarepatientswithacutekidneyinjuryasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesis AT burbanoximena impactofearlyversuslateinitiationofrenalreplacementtherapyincriticalcarepatientswithacutekidneyinjuryasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesis AT barrisfordglenw impactofearlyversuslateinitiationofrenalreplacementtherapyincriticalcarepatientswithacutekidneyinjuryasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesis AT kaoraymondlc impactofearlyversuslateinitiationofrenalreplacementtherapyincriticalcarepatientswithacutekidneyinjuryasystematicreviewandevidencesynthesis |