Cargando…
Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study
AIMS: To obtain information on organizational aspects, case mix and practices in Indian Intensive Care Units (ICUs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational, 4-day point prevalence study was performed between 2010 and 2011 in 4209 patients from 124 ICUs. ICU and patient characteristics, and intervent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27186054 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.180042 |
_version_ | 1782430921886007296 |
---|---|
author | Divatia, Jigeeshu V. Amin, Pravin R. Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Kapadia, Farhad N. Todi, Subhash Sahu, Samir Govil, Deepak Chawla, Rajesh Kulkarni, Atul P. Samavedam, Srinivas Jani, Charu K. Rungta, Narendra Samaddar, Devi Prasad Mehta, Sujata Venkataraman, Ramesh Hegde, Ashit Bande, BD Dhanuka, Sanjay Singh, Virendra Tewari, Reshma Zirpe, Kapil Sathe, Prachee |
author_facet | Divatia, Jigeeshu V. Amin, Pravin R. Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Kapadia, Farhad N. Todi, Subhash Sahu, Samir Govil, Deepak Chawla, Rajesh Kulkarni, Atul P. Samavedam, Srinivas Jani, Charu K. Rungta, Narendra Samaddar, Devi Prasad Mehta, Sujata Venkataraman, Ramesh Hegde, Ashit Bande, BD Dhanuka, Sanjay Singh, Virendra Tewari, Reshma Zirpe, Kapil Sathe, Prachee |
author_sort | Divatia, Jigeeshu V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To obtain information on organizational aspects, case mix and practices in Indian Intensive Care Units (ICUs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational, 4-day point prevalence study was performed between 2010 and 2011 in 4209 patients from 124 ICUs. ICU and patient characteristics, and interventions were recorded for 24 h of the study day, and outcomes till 30 days after the study day. Data were analyzed for 4038 adult patients from 120 ICUs. RESULTS: On the study day, mean age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were 54.1 ± 17.1 years, 17.4 ± 9.2 and 3.8 ± 3.6, respectively. About 46.4% patients had ≥1 organ failure. Nearly, 37% and 22.2% patients received mechanical ventilation (MV) and vasopressors or inotropes, respectively. Nearly, 12.2% patients developed an infection in the ICU. About 28.3% patients had severe sepsis or septic shock (SvSpSS) during their ICU stay. About 60.7% patients without infection received antibiotics. There were 546 deaths and 183 terminal discharges (TDs) from ICU (including left against medical advice or discharged on request), with ICU mortality 729/4038 (18.1%). In 1627 patients admitted within 24 h of the study day, the standardized mortality ratio was 0.67. The APACHE II and SOFA scores, public hospital ICUs, medical ICUs, inadequately equipped ICUs, medical admission, self-paying patient, presence of SvSpSS, acute respiratory failure or cancer, need for a fluid bolus, and MV were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The high proportion of TDs and the association of public hospitals, self-paying patients, and inadequately equipped hospitals with mortality has important implications for critical care in India. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4859158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48591582016-05-16 Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study Divatia, Jigeeshu V. Amin, Pravin R. Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Kapadia, Farhad N. Todi, Subhash Sahu, Samir Govil, Deepak Chawla, Rajesh Kulkarni, Atul P. Samavedam, Srinivas Jani, Charu K. Rungta, Narendra Samaddar, Devi Prasad Mehta, Sujata Venkataraman, Ramesh Hegde, Ashit Bande, BD Dhanuka, Sanjay Singh, Virendra Tewari, Reshma Zirpe, Kapil Sathe, Prachee Indian J Crit Care Med Research Article AIMS: To obtain information on organizational aspects, case mix and practices in Indian Intensive Care Units (ICUs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational, 4-day point prevalence study was performed between 2010 and 2011 in 4209 patients from 124 ICUs. ICU and patient characteristics, and interventions were recorded for 24 h of the study day, and outcomes till 30 days after the study day. Data were analyzed for 4038 adult patients from 120 ICUs. RESULTS: On the study day, mean age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were 54.1 ± 17.1 years, 17.4 ± 9.2 and 3.8 ± 3.6, respectively. About 46.4% patients had ≥1 organ failure. Nearly, 37% and 22.2% patients received mechanical ventilation (MV) and vasopressors or inotropes, respectively. Nearly, 12.2% patients developed an infection in the ICU. About 28.3% patients had severe sepsis or septic shock (SvSpSS) during their ICU stay. About 60.7% patients without infection received antibiotics. There were 546 deaths and 183 terminal discharges (TDs) from ICU (including left against medical advice or discharged on request), with ICU mortality 729/4038 (18.1%). In 1627 patients admitted within 24 h of the study day, the standardized mortality ratio was 0.67. The APACHE II and SOFA scores, public hospital ICUs, medical ICUs, inadequately equipped ICUs, medical admission, self-paying patient, presence of SvSpSS, acute respiratory failure or cancer, need for a fluid bolus, and MV were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The high proportion of TDs and the association of public hospitals, self-paying patients, and inadequately equipped hospitals with mortality has important implications for critical care in India. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4859158/ /pubmed/27186054 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.180042 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Divatia, Jigeeshu V. Amin, Pravin R. Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Kapadia, Farhad N. Todi, Subhash Sahu, Samir Govil, Deepak Chawla, Rajesh Kulkarni, Atul P. Samavedam, Srinivas Jani, Charu K. Rungta, Narendra Samaddar, Devi Prasad Mehta, Sujata Venkataraman, Ramesh Hegde, Ashit Bande, BD Dhanuka, Sanjay Singh, Virendra Tewari, Reshma Zirpe, Kapil Sathe, Prachee Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study |
title | Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study |
title_full | Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study |
title_fullStr | Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study |
title_short | Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study |
title_sort | intensive care in india: the indian intensive care case mix and practice patterns study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27186054 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.180042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT divatiajigeeshuv intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT aminpravinr intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT ramakrishnannagarajan intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT kapadiafarhadn intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT todisubhash intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT sahusamir intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT govildeepak intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT chawlarajesh intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT kulkarniatulp intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT samavedamsrinivas intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT janicharuk intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT rungtanarendra intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT samaddardeviprasad intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT mehtasujata intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT venkataramanramesh intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT hegdeashit intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT bandebd intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT dhanukasanjay intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT singhvirendra intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT tewarireshma intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT zirpekapil intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT satheprachee intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy AT intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy |