Cargando…

Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study

AIMS: To obtain information on organizational aspects, case mix and practices in Indian Intensive Care Units (ICUs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational, 4-day point prevalence study was performed between 2010 and 2011 in 4209 patients from 124 ICUs. ICU and patient characteristics, and intervent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Divatia, Jigeeshu V., Amin, Pravin R., Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan, Kapadia, Farhad N., Todi, Subhash, Sahu, Samir, Govil, Deepak, Chawla, Rajesh, Kulkarni, Atul P., Samavedam, Srinivas, Jani, Charu K., Rungta, Narendra, Samaddar, Devi Prasad, Mehta, Sujata, Venkataraman, Ramesh, Hegde, Ashit, Bande, BD, Dhanuka, Sanjay, Singh, Virendra, Tewari, Reshma, Zirpe, Kapil, Sathe, Prachee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27186054
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.180042
_version_ 1782430921886007296
author Divatia, Jigeeshu V.
Amin, Pravin R.
Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan
Kapadia, Farhad N.
Todi, Subhash
Sahu, Samir
Govil, Deepak
Chawla, Rajesh
Kulkarni, Atul P.
Samavedam, Srinivas
Jani, Charu K.
Rungta, Narendra
Samaddar, Devi Prasad
Mehta, Sujata
Venkataraman, Ramesh
Hegde, Ashit
Bande, BD
Dhanuka, Sanjay
Singh, Virendra
Tewari, Reshma
Zirpe, Kapil
Sathe, Prachee
author_facet Divatia, Jigeeshu V.
Amin, Pravin R.
Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan
Kapadia, Farhad N.
Todi, Subhash
Sahu, Samir
Govil, Deepak
Chawla, Rajesh
Kulkarni, Atul P.
Samavedam, Srinivas
Jani, Charu K.
Rungta, Narendra
Samaddar, Devi Prasad
Mehta, Sujata
Venkataraman, Ramesh
Hegde, Ashit
Bande, BD
Dhanuka, Sanjay
Singh, Virendra
Tewari, Reshma
Zirpe, Kapil
Sathe, Prachee
author_sort Divatia, Jigeeshu V.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To obtain information on organizational aspects, case mix and practices in Indian Intensive Care Units (ICUs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational, 4-day point prevalence study was performed between 2010 and 2011 in 4209 patients from 124 ICUs. ICU and patient characteristics, and interventions were recorded for 24 h of the study day, and outcomes till 30 days after the study day. Data were analyzed for 4038 adult patients from 120 ICUs. RESULTS: On the study day, mean age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were 54.1 ± 17.1 years, 17.4 ± 9.2 and 3.8 ± 3.6, respectively. About 46.4% patients had ≥1 organ failure. Nearly, 37% and 22.2% patients received mechanical ventilation (MV) and vasopressors or inotropes, respectively. Nearly, 12.2% patients developed an infection in the ICU. About 28.3% patients had severe sepsis or septic shock (SvSpSS) during their ICU stay. About 60.7% patients without infection received antibiotics. There were 546 deaths and 183 terminal discharges (TDs) from ICU (including left against medical advice or discharged on request), with ICU mortality 729/4038 (18.1%). In 1627 patients admitted within 24 h of the study day, the standardized mortality ratio was 0.67. The APACHE II and SOFA scores, public hospital ICUs, medical ICUs, inadequately equipped ICUs, medical admission, self-paying patient, presence of SvSpSS, acute respiratory failure or cancer, need for a fluid bolus, and MV were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The high proportion of TDs and the association of public hospitals, self-paying patients, and inadequately equipped hospitals with mortality has important implications for critical care in India.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4859158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48591582016-05-16 Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study Divatia, Jigeeshu V. Amin, Pravin R. Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Kapadia, Farhad N. Todi, Subhash Sahu, Samir Govil, Deepak Chawla, Rajesh Kulkarni, Atul P. Samavedam, Srinivas Jani, Charu K. Rungta, Narendra Samaddar, Devi Prasad Mehta, Sujata Venkataraman, Ramesh Hegde, Ashit Bande, BD Dhanuka, Sanjay Singh, Virendra Tewari, Reshma Zirpe, Kapil Sathe, Prachee Indian J Crit Care Med Research Article AIMS: To obtain information on organizational aspects, case mix and practices in Indian Intensive Care Units (ICUs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational, 4-day point prevalence study was performed between 2010 and 2011 in 4209 patients from 124 ICUs. ICU and patient characteristics, and interventions were recorded for 24 h of the study day, and outcomes till 30 days after the study day. Data were analyzed for 4038 adult patients from 120 ICUs. RESULTS: On the study day, mean age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were 54.1 ± 17.1 years, 17.4 ± 9.2 and 3.8 ± 3.6, respectively. About 46.4% patients had ≥1 organ failure. Nearly, 37% and 22.2% patients received mechanical ventilation (MV) and vasopressors or inotropes, respectively. Nearly, 12.2% patients developed an infection in the ICU. About 28.3% patients had severe sepsis or septic shock (SvSpSS) during their ICU stay. About 60.7% patients without infection received antibiotics. There were 546 deaths and 183 terminal discharges (TDs) from ICU (including left against medical advice or discharged on request), with ICU mortality 729/4038 (18.1%). In 1627 patients admitted within 24 h of the study day, the standardized mortality ratio was 0.67. The APACHE II and SOFA scores, public hospital ICUs, medical ICUs, inadequately equipped ICUs, medical admission, self-paying patient, presence of SvSpSS, acute respiratory failure or cancer, need for a fluid bolus, and MV were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The high proportion of TDs and the association of public hospitals, self-paying patients, and inadequately equipped hospitals with mortality has important implications for critical care in India. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4859158/ /pubmed/27186054 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.180042 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Divatia, Jigeeshu V.
Amin, Pravin R.
Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan
Kapadia, Farhad N.
Todi, Subhash
Sahu, Samir
Govil, Deepak
Chawla, Rajesh
Kulkarni, Atul P.
Samavedam, Srinivas
Jani, Charu K.
Rungta, Narendra
Samaddar, Devi Prasad
Mehta, Sujata
Venkataraman, Ramesh
Hegde, Ashit
Bande, BD
Dhanuka, Sanjay
Singh, Virendra
Tewari, Reshma
Zirpe, Kapil
Sathe, Prachee
Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study
title Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study
title_full Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study
title_fullStr Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study
title_full_unstemmed Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study
title_short Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study
title_sort intensive care in india: the indian intensive care case mix and practice patterns study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27186054
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.180042
work_keys_str_mv AT divatiajigeeshuv intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT aminpravinr intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT ramakrishnannagarajan intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT kapadiafarhadn intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT todisubhash intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT sahusamir intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT govildeepak intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT chawlarajesh intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT kulkarniatulp intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT samavedamsrinivas intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT janicharuk intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT rungtanarendra intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT samaddardeviprasad intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT mehtasujata intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT venkataramanramesh intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT hegdeashit intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT bandebd intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT dhanukasanjay intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT singhvirendra intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT tewarireshma intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT zirpekapil intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT satheprachee intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy
AT intensivecareinindiatheindianintensivecarecasemixandpracticepatternsstudy