Cargando…

Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF)

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation with fat injection is a growing trend in Japan. Many Japanese patients experiencing breast implant complications are requesting to have their breast implants removed and simultaneously exchanged with autologous fat injection. The keys of our simultaneous implant excha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohashi, Masanori, Yamakawa, Masayuki, Chiba, Akihiko, Nagano, Hiroshi, Nakai, Hirokazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000601
_version_ 1782430936826118144
author Ohashi, Masanori
Yamakawa, Masayuki
Chiba, Akihiko
Nagano, Hiroshi
Nakai, Hirokazu
author_facet Ohashi, Masanori
Yamakawa, Masayuki
Chiba, Akihiko
Nagano, Hiroshi
Nakai, Hirokazu
author_sort Ohashi, Masanori
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation with fat injection is a growing trend in Japan. Many Japanese patients experiencing breast implant complications are requesting to have their breast implants removed and simultaneously exchanged with autologous fat injection. The keys of our simultaneous implant exchange with fat (SIEF) process are to embrace the “Coleman technique” and to carefully detach implant capsules when removing breast implants. Furthermore, we carefully inject fat to avoid necrosis. METHODS: Between January 2010 and January 2015, we investigated consecutively 131 Japanese patients whom we could follow up for over 6 months postsurgery. We ascertained the usefulness of SIEF by assessing changes in breast size, complications, and a satisfaction survey. RESULTS: There were no serious complications. We had experienced mild complications in 9.2% of patients (12/131). Partial fat necrosis with inflammation occurred in 2.3% of patients (3/131), seroma in the capsule in 3.1% (4/131), complaints of nodules (cysts, lumps) in 3.1% (4/131), and 1 hematoma patient (0.8%). At 6 months after surgery (n = 131), breast cup size (by Japanese Industrial Standards) had decreased by less than 1 cup size, despite SIEF. At 6 months, we performed a postsurgery satisfaction survey, and only 4% of the patients (5/131) were not satisfied with their surgery results. CONCLUSIONS: SIEF is a very safe and effective procedure. Breast implants removed with a low invasive traumatic approach and centrifuged fat injected with the “Coleman technique” are important principles in our practice. Furthermore, avoiding fat necrosis is one of the most important considerations, and our SIEF approach allows us to better control this potential complication during the surgical process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4859250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48592502016-05-19 Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF) Ohashi, Masanori Yamakawa, Masayuki Chiba, Akihiko Nagano, Hiroshi Nakai, Hirokazu Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation with fat injection is a growing trend in Japan. Many Japanese patients experiencing breast implant complications are requesting to have their breast implants removed and simultaneously exchanged with autologous fat injection. The keys of our simultaneous implant exchange with fat (SIEF) process are to embrace the “Coleman technique” and to carefully detach implant capsules when removing breast implants. Furthermore, we carefully inject fat to avoid necrosis. METHODS: Between January 2010 and January 2015, we investigated consecutively 131 Japanese patients whom we could follow up for over 6 months postsurgery. We ascertained the usefulness of SIEF by assessing changes in breast size, complications, and a satisfaction survey. RESULTS: There were no serious complications. We had experienced mild complications in 9.2% of patients (12/131). Partial fat necrosis with inflammation occurred in 2.3% of patients (3/131), seroma in the capsule in 3.1% (4/131), complaints of nodules (cysts, lumps) in 3.1% (4/131), and 1 hematoma patient (0.8%). At 6 months after surgery (n = 131), breast cup size (by Japanese Industrial Standards) had decreased by less than 1 cup size, despite SIEF. At 6 months, we performed a postsurgery satisfaction survey, and only 4% of the patients (5/131) were not satisfied with their surgery results. CONCLUSIONS: SIEF is a very safe and effective procedure. Breast implants removed with a low invasive traumatic approach and centrifuged fat injected with the “Coleman technique” are important principles in our practice. Furthermore, avoiding fat necrosis is one of the most important considerations, and our SIEF approach allows us to better control this potential complication during the surgical process. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4859250/ /pubmed/27200253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000601 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ohashi, Masanori
Yamakawa, Masayuki
Chiba, Akihiko
Nagano, Hiroshi
Nakai, Hirokazu
Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF)
title Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF)
title_full Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF)
title_fullStr Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF)
title_full_unstemmed Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF)
title_short Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF)
title_sort our experience with 131 cases of simultaneous breast implant exhange with fat (sief)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000601
work_keys_str_mv AT ohashimasanori ourexperiencewith131casesofsimultaneousbreastimplantexhangewithfatsief
AT yamakawamasayuki ourexperiencewith131casesofsimultaneousbreastimplantexhangewithfatsief
AT chibaakihiko ourexperiencewith131casesofsimultaneousbreastimplantexhangewithfatsief
AT naganohiroshi ourexperiencewith131casesofsimultaneousbreastimplantexhangewithfatsief
AT nakaihirokazu ourexperiencewith131casesofsimultaneousbreastimplantexhangewithfatsief