Cargando…
Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF)
BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation with fat injection is a growing trend in Japan. Many Japanese patients experiencing breast implant complications are requesting to have their breast implants removed and simultaneously exchanged with autologous fat injection. The keys of our simultaneous implant excha...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000601 |
_version_ | 1782430936826118144 |
---|---|
author | Ohashi, Masanori Yamakawa, Masayuki Chiba, Akihiko Nagano, Hiroshi Nakai, Hirokazu |
author_facet | Ohashi, Masanori Yamakawa, Masayuki Chiba, Akihiko Nagano, Hiroshi Nakai, Hirokazu |
author_sort | Ohashi, Masanori |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation with fat injection is a growing trend in Japan. Many Japanese patients experiencing breast implant complications are requesting to have their breast implants removed and simultaneously exchanged with autologous fat injection. The keys of our simultaneous implant exchange with fat (SIEF) process are to embrace the “Coleman technique” and to carefully detach implant capsules when removing breast implants. Furthermore, we carefully inject fat to avoid necrosis. METHODS: Between January 2010 and January 2015, we investigated consecutively 131 Japanese patients whom we could follow up for over 6 months postsurgery. We ascertained the usefulness of SIEF by assessing changes in breast size, complications, and a satisfaction survey. RESULTS: There were no serious complications. We had experienced mild complications in 9.2% of patients (12/131). Partial fat necrosis with inflammation occurred in 2.3% of patients (3/131), seroma in the capsule in 3.1% (4/131), complaints of nodules (cysts, lumps) in 3.1% (4/131), and 1 hematoma patient (0.8%). At 6 months after surgery (n = 131), breast cup size (by Japanese Industrial Standards) had decreased by less than 1 cup size, despite SIEF. At 6 months, we performed a postsurgery satisfaction survey, and only 4% of the patients (5/131) were not satisfied with their surgery results. CONCLUSIONS: SIEF is a very safe and effective procedure. Breast implants removed with a low invasive traumatic approach and centrifuged fat injected with the “Coleman technique” are important principles in our practice. Furthermore, avoiding fat necrosis is one of the most important considerations, and our SIEF approach allows us to better control this potential complication during the surgical process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4859250 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48592502016-05-19 Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF) Ohashi, Masanori Yamakawa, Masayuki Chiba, Akihiko Nagano, Hiroshi Nakai, Hirokazu Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation with fat injection is a growing trend in Japan. Many Japanese patients experiencing breast implant complications are requesting to have their breast implants removed and simultaneously exchanged with autologous fat injection. The keys of our simultaneous implant exchange with fat (SIEF) process are to embrace the “Coleman technique” and to carefully detach implant capsules when removing breast implants. Furthermore, we carefully inject fat to avoid necrosis. METHODS: Between January 2010 and January 2015, we investigated consecutively 131 Japanese patients whom we could follow up for over 6 months postsurgery. We ascertained the usefulness of SIEF by assessing changes in breast size, complications, and a satisfaction survey. RESULTS: There were no serious complications. We had experienced mild complications in 9.2% of patients (12/131). Partial fat necrosis with inflammation occurred in 2.3% of patients (3/131), seroma in the capsule in 3.1% (4/131), complaints of nodules (cysts, lumps) in 3.1% (4/131), and 1 hematoma patient (0.8%). At 6 months after surgery (n = 131), breast cup size (by Japanese Industrial Standards) had decreased by less than 1 cup size, despite SIEF. At 6 months, we performed a postsurgery satisfaction survey, and only 4% of the patients (5/131) were not satisfied with their surgery results. CONCLUSIONS: SIEF is a very safe and effective procedure. Breast implants removed with a low invasive traumatic approach and centrifuged fat injected with the “Coleman technique” are important principles in our practice. Furthermore, avoiding fat necrosis is one of the most important considerations, and our SIEF approach allows us to better control this potential complication during the surgical process. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4859250/ /pubmed/27200253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000601 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ohashi, Masanori Yamakawa, Masayuki Chiba, Akihiko Nagano, Hiroshi Nakai, Hirokazu Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF) |
title | Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF) |
title_full | Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF) |
title_fullStr | Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF) |
title_full_unstemmed | Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF) |
title_short | Our Experience with 131 Cases of Simultaneous Breast Implant Exhange with Fat (SIEF) |
title_sort | our experience with 131 cases of simultaneous breast implant exhange with fat (sief) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000601 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohashimasanori ourexperiencewith131casesofsimultaneousbreastimplantexhangewithfatsief AT yamakawamasayuki ourexperiencewith131casesofsimultaneousbreastimplantexhangewithfatsief AT chibaakihiko ourexperiencewith131casesofsimultaneousbreastimplantexhangewithfatsief AT naganohiroshi ourexperiencewith131casesofsimultaneousbreastimplantexhangewithfatsief AT nakaihirokazu ourexperiencewith131casesofsimultaneousbreastimplantexhangewithfatsief |