Cargando…

Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Plaque Progression With Advanced Intravascular Imaging, Physiological Measures, and Wall Shear Stress: A Pilot Double‐Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Nebivolol Versus Atenolol in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that nebivolol, a β‐blocker with nitric oxide–mediated activity, compared with atenolol, a β‐blocker without such activity, would decrease oxidative stress and improve the effects of endothelial dysfunction and wall shear stress (WSS), thereby reducing atherosclerosis pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hung, Olivia Y., Molony, David, Corban, Michel T., Rasoul‐Arzrumly, Emad, Maynard, Charles, Eshtehardi, Parham, Dhawan, Saurabh, Timmins, Lucas H., Piccinelli, Marina, Ahn, Sung Gyun, Gogas, Bill D., McDaniel, Michael C., Quyyumi, Arshed A., Giddens, Don P., Samady, Habib
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002764
_version_ 1782430958918565888
author Hung, Olivia Y.
Molony, David
Corban, Michel T.
Rasoul‐Arzrumly, Emad
Maynard, Charles
Eshtehardi, Parham
Dhawan, Saurabh
Timmins, Lucas H.
Piccinelli, Marina
Ahn, Sung Gyun
Gogas, Bill D.
McDaniel, Michael C.
Quyyumi, Arshed A.
Giddens, Don P.
Samady, Habib
author_facet Hung, Olivia Y.
Molony, David
Corban, Michel T.
Rasoul‐Arzrumly, Emad
Maynard, Charles
Eshtehardi, Parham
Dhawan, Saurabh
Timmins, Lucas H.
Piccinelli, Marina
Ahn, Sung Gyun
Gogas, Bill D.
McDaniel, Michael C.
Quyyumi, Arshed A.
Giddens, Don P.
Samady, Habib
author_sort Hung, Olivia Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that nebivolol, a β‐blocker with nitric oxide–mediated activity, compared with atenolol, a β‐blocker without such activity, would decrease oxidative stress and improve the effects of endothelial dysfunction and wall shear stress (WSS), thereby reducing atherosclerosis progression and vulnerability in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this pilot double‐blinded randomized controlled trial, 24 patients treated for 1 year with nebivolol 10 mg versus atenolol 100 mg plus standard medical therapy underwent baseline and follow‐up coronary angiography with assessments of inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers, microvascular function, endothelial function, and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. WSS was calculated from computational fluid dynamics. Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound segments were assessed for vessel volumetrics and remodeling. There was a trend toward more low‐WSS segments in the nebivolol cohort (P=0.06). Low‐WSS regions were associated with greater plaque progression (P<0.0001) and constrictive remodeling (P=0.04); conversely, high‐WSS segments demonstrated plaque regression and excessive expansive remodeling. Nebivolol patients had decreased lumen and vessel areas along with increased plaque area, resulting in more constrictive remodeling (P=0.002). There were no significant differences in biomarker levels, microvascular function, endothelial function, or number of thin‐capped fibroatheromas per vessel. Importantly, after adjusting for β‐blocker, low‐WSS segments remained significantly associated with lumen loss and plaque progression. CONCLUSION: Nebivolol, compared with atenolol, was associated with greater plaque progression and constrictive remodeling, likely driven by more low‐WSS segments in the nebivolol arm. Both β‐blockers had similar effects on oxidative stress, microvascular function, and endothelial function. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01230892.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4859395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48593952016-05-20 Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Plaque Progression With Advanced Intravascular Imaging, Physiological Measures, and Wall Shear Stress: A Pilot Double‐Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Nebivolol Versus Atenolol in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease Hung, Olivia Y. Molony, David Corban, Michel T. Rasoul‐Arzrumly, Emad Maynard, Charles Eshtehardi, Parham Dhawan, Saurabh Timmins, Lucas H. Piccinelli, Marina Ahn, Sung Gyun Gogas, Bill D. McDaniel, Michael C. Quyyumi, Arshed A. Giddens, Don P. Samady, Habib J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that nebivolol, a β‐blocker with nitric oxide–mediated activity, compared with atenolol, a β‐blocker without such activity, would decrease oxidative stress and improve the effects of endothelial dysfunction and wall shear stress (WSS), thereby reducing atherosclerosis progression and vulnerability in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this pilot double‐blinded randomized controlled trial, 24 patients treated for 1 year with nebivolol 10 mg versus atenolol 100 mg plus standard medical therapy underwent baseline and follow‐up coronary angiography with assessments of inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers, microvascular function, endothelial function, and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. WSS was calculated from computational fluid dynamics. Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound segments were assessed for vessel volumetrics and remodeling. There was a trend toward more low‐WSS segments in the nebivolol cohort (P=0.06). Low‐WSS regions were associated with greater plaque progression (P<0.0001) and constrictive remodeling (P=0.04); conversely, high‐WSS segments demonstrated plaque regression and excessive expansive remodeling. Nebivolol patients had decreased lumen and vessel areas along with increased plaque area, resulting in more constrictive remodeling (P=0.002). There were no significant differences in biomarker levels, microvascular function, endothelial function, or number of thin‐capped fibroatheromas per vessel. Importantly, after adjusting for β‐blocker, low‐WSS segments remained significantly associated with lumen loss and plaque progression. CONCLUSION: Nebivolol, compared with atenolol, was associated with greater plaque progression and constrictive remodeling, likely driven by more low‐WSS segments in the nebivolol arm. Both β‐blockers had similar effects on oxidative stress, microvascular function, and endothelial function. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01230892. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4859395/ /pubmed/26811165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002764 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hung, Olivia Y.
Molony, David
Corban, Michel T.
Rasoul‐Arzrumly, Emad
Maynard, Charles
Eshtehardi, Parham
Dhawan, Saurabh
Timmins, Lucas H.
Piccinelli, Marina
Ahn, Sung Gyun
Gogas, Bill D.
McDaniel, Michael C.
Quyyumi, Arshed A.
Giddens, Don P.
Samady, Habib
Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Plaque Progression With Advanced Intravascular Imaging, Physiological Measures, and Wall Shear Stress: A Pilot Double‐Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Nebivolol Versus Atenolol in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease
title Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Plaque Progression With Advanced Intravascular Imaging, Physiological Measures, and Wall Shear Stress: A Pilot Double‐Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Nebivolol Versus Atenolol in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease
title_full Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Plaque Progression With Advanced Intravascular Imaging, Physiological Measures, and Wall Shear Stress: A Pilot Double‐Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Nebivolol Versus Atenolol in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease
title_fullStr Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Plaque Progression With Advanced Intravascular Imaging, Physiological Measures, and Wall Shear Stress: A Pilot Double‐Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Nebivolol Versus Atenolol in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Plaque Progression With Advanced Intravascular Imaging, Physiological Measures, and Wall Shear Stress: A Pilot Double‐Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Nebivolol Versus Atenolol in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease
title_short Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Plaque Progression With Advanced Intravascular Imaging, Physiological Measures, and Wall Shear Stress: A Pilot Double‐Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Nebivolol Versus Atenolol in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease
title_sort comprehensive assessment of coronary plaque progression with advanced intravascular imaging, physiological measures, and wall shear stress: a pilot double‐blinded randomized controlled clinical trial of nebivolol versus atenolol in nonobstructive coronary artery disease
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002764
work_keys_str_mv AT hungoliviay comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT molonydavid comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT corbanmichelt comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT rasoularzrumlyemad comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT maynardcharles comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT eshtehardiparham comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT dhawansaurabh comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT timminslucash comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT piccinellimarina comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT ahnsunggyun comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT gogasbilld comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT mcdanielmichaelc comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT quyyumiarsheda comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT giddensdonp comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease
AT samadyhabib comprehensiveassessmentofcoronaryplaqueprogressionwithadvancedintravascularimagingphysiologicalmeasuresandwallshearstressapilotdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialofnebivololversusatenololinnonobstructivecoronaryarterydisease