Cargando…

Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms

BACKGROUND: Tight coil packing with density of at least 20%–25% is known to be important for preventing recanalization after embolization of cerebral aneurysms. However, large aneurysms sometimes recanalize regardless of the packing density, suggesting that the absolute residual volume which is dete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadato, Akiyo, Hayakawa, Motoharu, Adachi, Kazuhide, Nakahara, Ichiro, Hirose, Yuichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27153192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155062
_version_ 1782430979261988864
author Sadato, Akiyo
Hayakawa, Motoharu
Adachi, Kazuhide
Nakahara, Ichiro
Hirose, Yuichi
author_facet Sadato, Akiyo
Hayakawa, Motoharu
Adachi, Kazuhide
Nakahara, Ichiro
Hirose, Yuichi
author_sort Sadato, Akiyo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tight coil packing with density of at least 20%–25% is known to be important for preventing recanalization after embolization of cerebral aneurysms. However, large aneurysms sometimes recanalize regardless of the packing density, suggesting that the absolute residual volume which is determined by aneurysm volume and packing density may be more important risk factor for recanalization. To validate this hypothesis, we analyzed the factors affecting the outcomes of treated aneurysms at our institute. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We included 355 small and large aneurysms. The following six factors were obtained from every case: aneurysm volume (mL), neck size (mm), packing density (%), residual volume (mL), rupture status at presentation, and stent assistance (with or without stent). The data were then subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant risk factors for recanalization. Recanalization occurred in 61 aneurysms (17.2%). Significant predictors for recanalization were aneurysm volume (odds ratio, 15.3; P < 0.001) and residual volume (odds ratio, 30.9; P < 0.001), but not packing density (odds ratio, 0.98; P = 0.341). These results showed that for each 0.1-mL increase in aneurysm volume and residual volume, the risk of recanalization increased by 1.3 times and 1.4 times, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The most influential risk factor for recanalization after coil embolization was residual volume, not packing density. The larger the aneurysm volume, the greater the packing density has to be to minimize the residual volume and risk of recanalization. Since tight coil packing has already been aimed, further innovation of coil property or embolization technique may be needed. Otherwise, different treatment modality such as flow diverter or parent artery occlusion may have to be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4859523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48595232016-05-13 Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms Sadato, Akiyo Hayakawa, Motoharu Adachi, Kazuhide Nakahara, Ichiro Hirose, Yuichi PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Tight coil packing with density of at least 20%–25% is known to be important for preventing recanalization after embolization of cerebral aneurysms. However, large aneurysms sometimes recanalize regardless of the packing density, suggesting that the absolute residual volume which is determined by aneurysm volume and packing density may be more important risk factor for recanalization. To validate this hypothesis, we analyzed the factors affecting the outcomes of treated aneurysms at our institute. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We included 355 small and large aneurysms. The following six factors were obtained from every case: aneurysm volume (mL), neck size (mm), packing density (%), residual volume (mL), rupture status at presentation, and stent assistance (with or without stent). The data were then subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant risk factors for recanalization. Recanalization occurred in 61 aneurysms (17.2%). Significant predictors for recanalization were aneurysm volume (odds ratio, 15.3; P < 0.001) and residual volume (odds ratio, 30.9; P < 0.001), but not packing density (odds ratio, 0.98; P = 0.341). These results showed that for each 0.1-mL increase in aneurysm volume and residual volume, the risk of recanalization increased by 1.3 times and 1.4 times, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The most influential risk factor for recanalization after coil embolization was residual volume, not packing density. The larger the aneurysm volume, the greater the packing density has to be to minimize the residual volume and risk of recanalization. Since tight coil packing has already been aimed, further innovation of coil property or embolization technique may be needed. Otherwise, different treatment modality such as flow diverter or parent artery occlusion may have to be considered. Public Library of Science 2016-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4859523/ /pubmed/27153192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155062 Text en © 2016 Sadato et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sadato, Akiyo
Hayakawa, Motoharu
Adachi, Kazuhide
Nakahara, Ichiro
Hirose, Yuichi
Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms
title Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms
title_full Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms
title_fullStr Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms
title_full_unstemmed Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms
title_short Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms
title_sort large residual volume, not low packing density, is the most influential risk factor for recanalization after coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27153192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155062
work_keys_str_mv AT sadatoakiyo largeresidualvolumenotlowpackingdensityisthemostinfluentialriskfactorforrecanalizationaftercoilembolizationofcerebralaneurysms
AT hayakawamotoharu largeresidualvolumenotlowpackingdensityisthemostinfluentialriskfactorforrecanalizationaftercoilembolizationofcerebralaneurysms
AT adachikazuhide largeresidualvolumenotlowpackingdensityisthemostinfluentialriskfactorforrecanalizationaftercoilembolizationofcerebralaneurysms
AT nakaharaichiro largeresidualvolumenotlowpackingdensityisthemostinfluentialriskfactorforrecanalizationaftercoilembolizationofcerebralaneurysms
AT hiroseyuichi largeresidualvolumenotlowpackingdensityisthemostinfluentialriskfactorforrecanalizationaftercoilembolizationofcerebralaneurysms