Cargando…

ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short-term outcomes?

Most of the studies concerning enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in colorectal surgery include heterogeneous groups of patients undergoing open or laparoscopic surgery, both due to colonic and rectal cancer, thus creating a potential bias. The data investigating the differences betwee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pędziwiatr, Michał, Pisarska, Magdalena, Kisielewski, Michał, Major, Piotr, Mydlowska, Anna, Rubinkiewicz, Mateusz, Winiarski, Marek, Budzyński, Andrzej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27154634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0772-6
_version_ 1782431006215634944
author Pędziwiatr, Michał
Pisarska, Magdalena
Kisielewski, Michał
Major, Piotr
Mydlowska, Anna
Rubinkiewicz, Mateusz
Winiarski, Marek
Budzyński, Andrzej
author_facet Pędziwiatr, Michał
Pisarska, Magdalena
Kisielewski, Michał
Major, Piotr
Mydlowska, Anna
Rubinkiewicz, Mateusz
Winiarski, Marek
Budzyński, Andrzej
author_sort Pędziwiatr, Michał
collection PubMed
description Most of the studies concerning enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in colorectal surgery include heterogeneous groups of patients undergoing open or laparoscopic surgery, both due to colonic and rectal cancer, thus creating a potential bias. The data investigating the differences between patients operated for either colonic or rectal cancer are sparse. The aim of the study was to compare short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colonic and rectal cancer with ERAS protocol. The analysis included consecutive prospectively registered patients operated for a colorectal cancer between January 2012 and September 2015. Patients were divided into two groups (colon vs. rectum). The measured outcomes were: length of stay (LOS), complication rate, readmission rate, compliance with ERAS protocol elements and recovery parameters (tolerance of early oral diet, mobilization and time to first flatus). Group 1 (colon) consisted of 150 patients and Group 2 (rectum) of 82 patients. Patients in Group 1 (150 patients) were discharged home earlier than in Group 2 (82 patients)—median LOS 4 versus 5 days, respectively. There was no statistical difference in complication rate (27.3 vs. 36.6 %) and readmissions (7.3 vs. 6.1 %). Compliance with the protocol was 86.9 and 82.6 %, respectively. However, in Group 1, the following procedures were used less frequently: bowel preparation (24 vs. 78.3 %) and postoperative drainage (23.3 vs. 71.0 %). There were no differences in recovery parameters between the groups. Univariate logistic regression showed that the type of surgery, drainage and stoma creation significantly prolonged LOS. In a multivariate logistic regression model, only a bowel preparation and drainage were shown to be significant. Although functional recovery and high compliance with ERAS protocol are possible irrespective of the type of surgery, laparoscopic rectal resections are associated with a longer LOS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4859853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48598532016-05-21 ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short-term outcomes? Pędziwiatr, Michał Pisarska, Magdalena Kisielewski, Michał Major, Piotr Mydlowska, Anna Rubinkiewicz, Mateusz Winiarski, Marek Budzyński, Andrzej Med Oncol Original Paper Most of the studies concerning enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in colorectal surgery include heterogeneous groups of patients undergoing open or laparoscopic surgery, both due to colonic and rectal cancer, thus creating a potential bias. The data investigating the differences between patients operated for either colonic or rectal cancer are sparse. The aim of the study was to compare short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colonic and rectal cancer with ERAS protocol. The analysis included consecutive prospectively registered patients operated for a colorectal cancer between January 2012 and September 2015. Patients were divided into two groups (colon vs. rectum). The measured outcomes were: length of stay (LOS), complication rate, readmission rate, compliance with ERAS protocol elements and recovery parameters (tolerance of early oral diet, mobilization and time to first flatus). Group 1 (colon) consisted of 150 patients and Group 2 (rectum) of 82 patients. Patients in Group 1 (150 patients) were discharged home earlier than in Group 2 (82 patients)—median LOS 4 versus 5 days, respectively. There was no statistical difference in complication rate (27.3 vs. 36.6 %) and readmissions (7.3 vs. 6.1 %). Compliance with the protocol was 86.9 and 82.6 %, respectively. However, in Group 1, the following procedures were used less frequently: bowel preparation (24 vs. 78.3 %) and postoperative drainage (23.3 vs. 71.0 %). There were no differences in recovery parameters between the groups. Univariate logistic regression showed that the type of surgery, drainage and stoma creation significantly prolonged LOS. In a multivariate logistic regression model, only a bowel preparation and drainage were shown to be significant. Although functional recovery and high compliance with ERAS protocol are possible irrespective of the type of surgery, laparoscopic rectal resections are associated with a longer LOS. Springer US 2016-05-06 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4859853/ /pubmed/27154634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0772-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Pędziwiatr, Michał
Pisarska, Magdalena
Kisielewski, Michał
Major, Piotr
Mydlowska, Anna
Rubinkiewicz, Mateusz
Winiarski, Marek
Budzyński, Andrzej
ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short-term outcomes?
title ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short-term outcomes?
title_full ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short-term outcomes?
title_fullStr ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short-term outcomes?
title_full_unstemmed ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short-term outcomes?
title_short ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short-term outcomes?
title_sort eras protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short-term outcomes?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27154634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0772-6
work_keys_str_mv AT pedziwiatrmichał erasprotocolinlaparoscopicsurgeryforcolonicversusrectalcarcinomaaretheredifferencesinshorttermoutcomes
AT pisarskamagdalena erasprotocolinlaparoscopicsurgeryforcolonicversusrectalcarcinomaaretheredifferencesinshorttermoutcomes
AT kisielewskimichał erasprotocolinlaparoscopicsurgeryforcolonicversusrectalcarcinomaaretheredifferencesinshorttermoutcomes
AT majorpiotr erasprotocolinlaparoscopicsurgeryforcolonicversusrectalcarcinomaaretheredifferencesinshorttermoutcomes
AT mydlowskaanna erasprotocolinlaparoscopicsurgeryforcolonicversusrectalcarcinomaaretheredifferencesinshorttermoutcomes
AT rubinkiewiczmateusz erasprotocolinlaparoscopicsurgeryforcolonicversusrectalcarcinomaaretheredifferencesinshorttermoutcomes
AT winiarskimarek erasprotocolinlaparoscopicsurgeryforcolonicversusrectalcarcinomaaretheredifferencesinshorttermoutcomes
AT budzynskiandrzej erasprotocolinlaparoscopicsurgeryforcolonicversusrectalcarcinomaaretheredifferencesinshorttermoutcomes