Cargando…

Processing Coordinate Subject-Verb Agreement in L1 and L2 Greek

The present study examines the processing of subject-verb (SV) number agreement with coordinate subjects in pre-verbal and post-verbal positions in Greek. Greek is a language with morphological number marked on nominal and verbal elements. Coordinate SV agreement, however, is special in Greek as it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaltsa, Maria, Tsimpli, Ianthi M., Marinis, Theodoros, Stavrou, Melita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4860499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27242577
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00648
_version_ 1782431079300333568
author Kaltsa, Maria
Tsimpli, Ianthi M.
Marinis, Theodoros
Stavrou, Melita
author_facet Kaltsa, Maria
Tsimpli, Ianthi M.
Marinis, Theodoros
Stavrou, Melita
author_sort Kaltsa, Maria
collection PubMed
description The present study examines the processing of subject-verb (SV) number agreement with coordinate subjects in pre-verbal and post-verbal positions in Greek. Greek is a language with morphological number marked on nominal and verbal elements. Coordinate SV agreement, however, is special in Greek as it is sensitive to the coordinate subject's position: when pre-verbal, the verb is marked for plural while when post-verbal the verb can be in the singular. We conducted two experiments, an acceptability judgment task with adult monolinguals as a pre-study (Experiment 1) and a self-paced reading task as the main study (Experiment 2) in order to obtain acceptance as well as processing data. Forty adult monolingual speakers of Greek participated in Experiment 1 and a hundred and forty one in Experiment 2. Seventy one children participated in Experiment 2: 30 Albanian-Greek sequential bilingual children and 41 Greek monolingual children aged 10–12 years. The adult data in Experiment 1 establish the difference in acceptability between singular VPs in SV and VS constructions reaffirming our hypothesis. Meanwhile, the adult data in Experiment 2 show that plural verbs accelerate processing regardless of subject position. The child online data show that sequential bilingual children have longer reading times (RTs) compared to the age-matched monolingual control group. However, both child groups follow a similar processing pattern in both pre-verbal and post-verbal constructions showing longer RTs immediately after a singular verb when the subject was pre-verbal indicating a grammaticality effect. In the post-verbal coordinate subject sentences, both child groups showed longer RTs on the first subject following the plural verb due to the temporary number mismatch between the verb and the first subject. This effect was resolved in monolingual children but was still present at the end of the sentence for bilingual children indicating difficulties to reanalyze and integrate information. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that (a) 10–12 year-old sequential bilingual children are sensitive to number agreement in SV coordinate constructions parsing sentences in the same way as monolingual children even though their vocabulary abilities are lower than that of age-matched monolingual peers and (b) bilinguals are slower in processing overall.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4860499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48604992016-05-30 Processing Coordinate Subject-Verb Agreement in L1 and L2 Greek Kaltsa, Maria Tsimpli, Ianthi M. Marinis, Theodoros Stavrou, Melita Front Psychol Psychology The present study examines the processing of subject-verb (SV) number agreement with coordinate subjects in pre-verbal and post-verbal positions in Greek. Greek is a language with morphological number marked on nominal and verbal elements. Coordinate SV agreement, however, is special in Greek as it is sensitive to the coordinate subject's position: when pre-verbal, the verb is marked for plural while when post-verbal the verb can be in the singular. We conducted two experiments, an acceptability judgment task with adult monolinguals as a pre-study (Experiment 1) and a self-paced reading task as the main study (Experiment 2) in order to obtain acceptance as well as processing data. Forty adult monolingual speakers of Greek participated in Experiment 1 and a hundred and forty one in Experiment 2. Seventy one children participated in Experiment 2: 30 Albanian-Greek sequential bilingual children and 41 Greek monolingual children aged 10–12 years. The adult data in Experiment 1 establish the difference in acceptability between singular VPs in SV and VS constructions reaffirming our hypothesis. Meanwhile, the adult data in Experiment 2 show that plural verbs accelerate processing regardless of subject position. The child online data show that sequential bilingual children have longer reading times (RTs) compared to the age-matched monolingual control group. However, both child groups follow a similar processing pattern in both pre-verbal and post-verbal constructions showing longer RTs immediately after a singular verb when the subject was pre-verbal indicating a grammaticality effect. In the post-verbal coordinate subject sentences, both child groups showed longer RTs on the first subject following the plural verb due to the temporary number mismatch between the verb and the first subject. This effect was resolved in monolingual children but was still present at the end of the sentence for bilingual children indicating difficulties to reanalyze and integrate information. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that (a) 10–12 year-old sequential bilingual children are sensitive to number agreement in SV coordinate constructions parsing sentences in the same way as monolingual children even though their vocabulary abilities are lower than that of age-matched monolingual peers and (b) bilinguals are slower in processing overall. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4860499/ /pubmed/27242577 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00648 Text en Copyright © 2016 Kaltsa, Tsimpli, Marinis and Stavrou. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Kaltsa, Maria
Tsimpli, Ianthi M.
Marinis, Theodoros
Stavrou, Melita
Processing Coordinate Subject-Verb Agreement in L1 and L2 Greek
title Processing Coordinate Subject-Verb Agreement in L1 and L2 Greek
title_full Processing Coordinate Subject-Verb Agreement in L1 and L2 Greek
title_fullStr Processing Coordinate Subject-Verb Agreement in L1 and L2 Greek
title_full_unstemmed Processing Coordinate Subject-Verb Agreement in L1 and L2 Greek
title_short Processing Coordinate Subject-Verb Agreement in L1 and L2 Greek
title_sort processing coordinate subject-verb agreement in l1 and l2 greek
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4860499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27242577
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00648
work_keys_str_mv AT kaltsamaria processingcoordinatesubjectverbagreementinl1andl2greek
AT tsimpliianthim processingcoordinatesubjectverbagreementinl1andl2greek
AT marinistheodoros processingcoordinatesubjectverbagreementinl1andl2greek
AT stavroumelita processingcoordinatesubjectverbagreementinl1andl2greek