Cargando…
Temperature response of bundle-sheath conductance in maize leaves
A small bundle-sheath conductance (g (bs)) is essential for the C(4) CO(2)-concentrating mechanism to suppress photorespiration effectively. To predict the productivity of C(4) crops accurately under global warming, it is necessary to examine whether and how g (bs) responds to temperature. We invest...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4861018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26969744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw104 |
_version_ | 1782431163916222464 |
---|---|
author | Yin, Xinyou van der Putten, Peter E.L. Driever, Steven M. Struik, Paul C. |
author_facet | Yin, Xinyou van der Putten, Peter E.L. Driever, Steven M. Struik, Paul C. |
author_sort | Yin, Xinyou |
collection | PubMed |
description | A small bundle-sheath conductance (g (bs)) is essential for the C(4) CO(2)-concentrating mechanism to suppress photorespiration effectively. To predict the productivity of C(4) crops accurately under global warming, it is necessary to examine whether and how g (bs) responds to temperature. We investigated the temperature response of g (bs) in maize by fitting a C(4) photosynthesis model to combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements of irradiance and CO(2) response curves at 21% and 2% O(2) within the range of 13.5–39 °C. The analysis was based on reported kinetic constants of C(4) Rubisco and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase and temperature responses of C(3) mesophyll conductance (g (m)). The estimates of g (bs) varied greatly with leaf temperature. The temperature response of g (bs) was well described by the peaked Arrhenius equation, with the optimum temperature being ~34 °C. The assumed temperature responses of g (m) had only a slight impact on the temperature response of g (bs). In contrast, using extreme values of some enzyme kinetic constants changed the shape of the response, from the peaked optimum response to the non-peaked Arrhenius pattern. Further studies are needed to confirm such an Arrhenius response pattern from independent measurement techniques and to assess whether it is common across C(4) species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4861018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48610182016-05-10 Temperature response of bundle-sheath conductance in maize leaves Yin, Xinyou van der Putten, Peter E.L. Driever, Steven M. Struik, Paul C. J Exp Bot Research Paper A small bundle-sheath conductance (g (bs)) is essential for the C(4) CO(2)-concentrating mechanism to suppress photorespiration effectively. To predict the productivity of C(4) crops accurately under global warming, it is necessary to examine whether and how g (bs) responds to temperature. We investigated the temperature response of g (bs) in maize by fitting a C(4) photosynthesis model to combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements of irradiance and CO(2) response curves at 21% and 2% O(2) within the range of 13.5–39 °C. The analysis was based on reported kinetic constants of C(4) Rubisco and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase and temperature responses of C(3) mesophyll conductance (g (m)). The estimates of g (bs) varied greatly with leaf temperature. The temperature response of g (bs) was well described by the peaked Arrhenius equation, with the optimum temperature being ~34 °C. The assumed temperature responses of g (m) had only a slight impact on the temperature response of g (bs). In contrast, using extreme values of some enzyme kinetic constants changed the shape of the response, from the peaked optimum response to the non-peaked Arrhenius pattern. Further studies are needed to confirm such an Arrhenius response pattern from independent measurement techniques and to assess whether it is common across C(4) species. Oxford University Press 2016-04 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4861018/ /pubmed/26969744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw104 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Yin, Xinyou van der Putten, Peter E.L. Driever, Steven M. Struik, Paul C. Temperature response of bundle-sheath conductance in maize leaves |
title | Temperature response of bundle-sheath conductance in maize leaves |
title_full | Temperature response of bundle-sheath conductance in maize leaves |
title_fullStr | Temperature response of bundle-sheath conductance in maize leaves |
title_full_unstemmed | Temperature response of bundle-sheath conductance in maize leaves |
title_short | Temperature response of bundle-sheath conductance in maize leaves |
title_sort | temperature response of bundle-sheath conductance in maize leaves |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4861018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26969744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yinxinyou temperatureresponseofbundlesheathconductanceinmaizeleaves AT vanderputtenpeterel temperatureresponseofbundlesheathconductanceinmaizeleaves AT drieverstevenm temperatureresponseofbundlesheathconductanceinmaizeleaves AT struikpaulc temperatureresponseofbundlesheathconductanceinmaizeleaves |