Cargando…
Comparison of Estimates between Cohort and Case–Control Studies in Meta-Analyses of Therapeutic Interventions: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
BACKGROUND: Observational studies are increasingly being used for assessing therapeutic interventions. Case–control studies are generally considered to have greater risk of bias than cohort studies, but we lack evidence of differences in effect estimates between the 2 study types. We aimed to compar...
Autores principales: | Lanza, Amy, Ravaud, Philippe, Riveros, Carolina, Dechartres, Agnes |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4861326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27159025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154877 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Meta-analyses including non-randomized studies of therapeutic interventions: a methodological review
por: Faber, Timor, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnès, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Impact of single centre status on estimates of intervention effects in trials with continuous outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
por: Bafeta, Aïda, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery
por: Villain, Benoit, et al.
Publicado: (2015)