Cargando…
Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options
Abfraction is a type of noncarious cervical lesion (NCCL) characterized by loss of tooth tissues with different clinical appearances. Evidence supports that abfraction lesions, as any NCCLs, have a multifactorial etiology. Particularly, the cervical wear of abfraction can occur as a result of normal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4861607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217799 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S63465 |
_version_ | 1782431235737387008 |
---|---|
author | Nascimento, Marcelle M Dilbone, Deborah A Pereira, Patricia NR Duarte, Wagner R Geraldeli, Saulo Delgado, Alex J |
author_facet | Nascimento, Marcelle M Dilbone, Deborah A Pereira, Patricia NR Duarte, Wagner R Geraldeli, Saulo Delgado, Alex J |
author_sort | Nascimento, Marcelle M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Abfraction is a type of noncarious cervical lesion (NCCL) characterized by loss of tooth tissues with different clinical appearances. Evidence supports that abfraction lesions, as any NCCLs, have a multifactorial etiology. Particularly, the cervical wear of abfraction can occur as a result of normal and abnormal tooth function and may also be accompanied by pathological wear, such as abrasion and erosion. The interaction between chemical, biological, and behavioral factors is critical and helps to explain why some individuals exhibit more than one type of cervical wear mechanism than others. In an era of personalized dentistry, patient risk factors for NCCLs must be identified and addressed before any treatment is performed. Marked variations exist in dental practice concerning the diagnosis and management of these lesions. The lack of understanding about the prognosis of these lesions with or without intervention may be a major contributor to variations in dentists’ management decisions. This review focuses on the current knowledge and available treatment strategies for abfraction lesions. By recognizing that progressive changes in the cervical area of the tooth are part of a physiologically dynamic process that occurs with aging, premature and unnecessary intervention can be avoided. In cases of asymptomatic teeth, where tooth vitality and function are not compromised, abfraction lesions should be monitored for at least 6 months before any invasive procedure is planned. In cases of abfraction associated with gingival recession, a combined restorative-surgical approach may be performed. Restorative intervention and occlusal adjustment are not indicated as treatment options to prevent further tooth loss or progression of abfraction. The clinical decision to restore abfraction lesions may be based on the need to replace form and function or to relieve hypersensitivity of severely compromised teeth or for esthetic reasons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4861607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48616072016-05-23 Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options Nascimento, Marcelle M Dilbone, Deborah A Pereira, Patricia NR Duarte, Wagner R Geraldeli, Saulo Delgado, Alex J Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Review Abfraction is a type of noncarious cervical lesion (NCCL) characterized by loss of tooth tissues with different clinical appearances. Evidence supports that abfraction lesions, as any NCCLs, have a multifactorial etiology. Particularly, the cervical wear of abfraction can occur as a result of normal and abnormal tooth function and may also be accompanied by pathological wear, such as abrasion and erosion. The interaction between chemical, biological, and behavioral factors is critical and helps to explain why some individuals exhibit more than one type of cervical wear mechanism than others. In an era of personalized dentistry, patient risk factors for NCCLs must be identified and addressed before any treatment is performed. Marked variations exist in dental practice concerning the diagnosis and management of these lesions. The lack of understanding about the prognosis of these lesions with or without intervention may be a major contributor to variations in dentists’ management decisions. This review focuses on the current knowledge and available treatment strategies for abfraction lesions. By recognizing that progressive changes in the cervical area of the tooth are part of a physiologically dynamic process that occurs with aging, premature and unnecessary intervention can be avoided. In cases of asymptomatic teeth, where tooth vitality and function are not compromised, abfraction lesions should be monitored for at least 6 months before any invasive procedure is planned. In cases of abfraction associated with gingival recession, a combined restorative-surgical approach may be performed. Restorative intervention and occlusal adjustment are not indicated as treatment options to prevent further tooth loss or progression of abfraction. The clinical decision to restore abfraction lesions may be based on the need to replace form and function or to relieve hypersensitivity of severely compromised teeth or for esthetic reasons. Dove Medical Press 2016-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4861607/ /pubmed/27217799 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S63465 Text en © 2016 Nascimento et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Nascimento, Marcelle M Dilbone, Deborah A Pereira, Patricia NR Duarte, Wagner R Geraldeli, Saulo Delgado, Alex J Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options |
title | Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options |
title_full | Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options |
title_fullStr | Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options |
title_full_unstemmed | Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options |
title_short | Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options |
title_sort | abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4861607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217799 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S63465 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nascimentomarcellem abfractionlesionsetiologydiagnosisandtreatmentoptions AT dilbonedeboraha abfractionlesionsetiologydiagnosisandtreatmentoptions AT pereirapatricianr abfractionlesionsetiologydiagnosisandtreatmentoptions AT duartewagnerr abfractionlesionsetiologydiagnosisandtreatmentoptions AT geraldelisaulo abfractionlesionsetiologydiagnosisandtreatmentoptions AT delgadoalexj abfractionlesionsetiologydiagnosisandtreatmentoptions |