Cargando…
Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy
OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and use of pegfilgrastim in cancer patients with high overall risk of FN and to investigate the relationship between granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) guideline adherence and chemotherapy delivery in Central and Eastern Eur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4861750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26745973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0917-1 |
_version_ | 1782431248346513408 |
---|---|
author | Mądry, Radosław Popławska, Lidia Haslbauer, Ferdinand Šafanda, Martin Ghizdavescu, Doru Benkovicova, Jana Csőszi, Tibor Mihaylov, Georgi Niepel, Daniela Jaeger, Christine Frkanova, Iveta Macovei, Alina Staudigl, Christine |
author_facet | Mądry, Radosław Popławska, Lidia Haslbauer, Ferdinand Šafanda, Martin Ghizdavescu, Doru Benkovicova, Jana Csőszi, Tibor Mihaylov, Georgi Niepel, Daniela Jaeger, Christine Frkanova, Iveta Macovei, Alina Staudigl, Christine |
author_sort | Mądry, Radosław |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and use of pegfilgrastim in cancer patients with high overall risk of FN and to investigate the relationship between granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) guideline adherence and chemotherapy delivery in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and Austria. METHODS: Dose Intensity Evaluation Program and Prophylaxis (DIEPP) was a multicentre, prospective, and observational study of adult patients with breast cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, gastric cancer, and ovarian cancer, who received chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim support and who had an overall risk of FN ≥ 20 %. Physicians assessed patient risk factors and reported their reasons for administering pegfilgrastim. RESULTS: Patients were enrolled from 113 centres in CEE and Austria between August 2010 and July 2013, and data were analysed from 1072 patients. The most common tumour types were breast cancer (50 %) and lymphoma (24 %). FN incidence was 5 % overall. FN occurred in 3 % of patients (28/875) who received pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis (PP) and 13 % of patients (19/142) who received it as secondary prophylaxis (SP); 79 % of FN events in SP patients occurred in the first cycle before pegfilgrastim was administered. The three most frequently chosen reasons for using pegfilgrastim were planned chemotherapy with high FN risk, female gender, and advanced disease. Overall, 40 % of patients received > 90 % of their planned chemotherapy dose within 3 days of the planned schedule. CONCLUSION: FN incidence was relatively low with pegfilgrastim PP in patients with a physician-assessed overall FN risk of ≥ 20 %. The most important reasons for pegfilgrastim use were consistent with the investigators’ risk assessment and international guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4861750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48617502016-05-23 Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy Mądry, Radosław Popławska, Lidia Haslbauer, Ferdinand Šafanda, Martin Ghizdavescu, Doru Benkovicova, Jana Csőszi, Tibor Mihaylov, Georgi Niepel, Daniela Jaeger, Christine Frkanova, Iveta Macovei, Alina Staudigl, Christine Wien Klin Wochenschr Original Article OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and use of pegfilgrastim in cancer patients with high overall risk of FN and to investigate the relationship between granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) guideline adherence and chemotherapy delivery in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and Austria. METHODS: Dose Intensity Evaluation Program and Prophylaxis (DIEPP) was a multicentre, prospective, and observational study of adult patients with breast cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, gastric cancer, and ovarian cancer, who received chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim support and who had an overall risk of FN ≥ 20 %. Physicians assessed patient risk factors and reported their reasons for administering pegfilgrastim. RESULTS: Patients were enrolled from 113 centres in CEE and Austria between August 2010 and July 2013, and data were analysed from 1072 patients. The most common tumour types were breast cancer (50 %) and lymphoma (24 %). FN incidence was 5 % overall. FN occurred in 3 % of patients (28/875) who received pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis (PP) and 13 % of patients (19/142) who received it as secondary prophylaxis (SP); 79 % of FN events in SP patients occurred in the first cycle before pegfilgrastim was administered. The three most frequently chosen reasons for using pegfilgrastim were planned chemotherapy with high FN risk, female gender, and advanced disease. Overall, 40 % of patients received > 90 % of their planned chemotherapy dose within 3 days of the planned schedule. CONCLUSION: FN incidence was relatively low with pegfilgrastim PP in patients with a physician-assessed overall FN risk of ≥ 20 %. The most important reasons for pegfilgrastim use were consistent with the investigators’ risk assessment and international guidelines. Springer Vienna 2016-01-08 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4861750/ /pubmed/26745973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0917-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mądry, Radosław Popławska, Lidia Haslbauer, Ferdinand Šafanda, Martin Ghizdavescu, Doru Benkovicova, Jana Csőszi, Tibor Mihaylov, Georgi Niepel, Daniela Jaeger, Christine Frkanova, Iveta Macovei, Alina Staudigl, Christine Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
title | Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
title_full | Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
title_short | Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
title_sort | results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (diepp) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4861750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26745973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0917-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madryradosław resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT popławskalidia resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT haslbauerferdinand resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT safandamartin resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT ghizdavescudoru resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT benkovicovajana resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT csoszitibor resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT mihaylovgeorgi resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT niepeldaniela resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT jaegerchristine resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT frkanovaiveta resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT macoveialina resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT staudiglchristine resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy |