Cargando…

Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and use of pegfilgrastim in cancer patients with high overall risk of FN and to investigate the relationship between granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) guideline adherence and chemotherapy delivery in Central and Eastern Eur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mądry, Radosław, Popławska, Lidia, Haslbauer, Ferdinand, Šafanda, Martin, Ghizdavescu, Doru, Benkovicova, Jana, Csőszi, Tibor, Mihaylov, Georgi, Niepel, Daniela, Jaeger, Christine, Frkanova, Iveta, Macovei, Alina, Staudigl, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4861750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26745973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0917-1
_version_ 1782431248346513408
author Mądry, Radosław
Popławska, Lidia
Haslbauer, Ferdinand
Šafanda, Martin
Ghizdavescu, Doru
Benkovicova, Jana
Csőszi, Tibor
Mihaylov, Georgi
Niepel, Daniela
Jaeger, Christine
Frkanova, Iveta
Macovei, Alina
Staudigl, Christine
author_facet Mądry, Radosław
Popławska, Lidia
Haslbauer, Ferdinand
Šafanda, Martin
Ghizdavescu, Doru
Benkovicova, Jana
Csőszi, Tibor
Mihaylov, Georgi
Niepel, Daniela
Jaeger, Christine
Frkanova, Iveta
Macovei, Alina
Staudigl, Christine
author_sort Mądry, Radosław
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and use of pegfilgrastim in cancer patients with high overall risk of FN and to investigate the relationship between granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) guideline adherence and chemotherapy delivery in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and Austria. METHODS: Dose Intensity Evaluation Program and Prophylaxis (DIEPP) was a multicentre, prospective, and observational study of adult patients with breast cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, gastric cancer, and ovarian cancer, who received chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim support and who had an overall risk of FN ≥ 20 %. Physicians assessed patient risk factors and reported their reasons for administering pegfilgrastim. RESULTS: Patients were enrolled from 113 centres in CEE and Austria between August 2010 and July 2013, and data were analysed from 1072 patients. The most common tumour types were breast cancer (50 %) and lymphoma (24 %). FN incidence was 5 % overall. FN occurred in 3 % of patients (28/875) who received pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis (PP) and 13 % of patients (19/142) who received it as secondary prophylaxis (SP); 79 % of FN events in SP patients occurred in the first cycle before pegfilgrastim was administered. The three most frequently chosen reasons for using pegfilgrastim were planned chemotherapy with high FN risk, female gender, and advanced disease. Overall, 40 % of patients received > 90 % of their planned chemotherapy dose within 3 days of the planned schedule. CONCLUSION: FN incidence was relatively low with pegfilgrastim PP in patients with a physician-assessed overall FN risk of ≥ 20 %. The most important reasons for pegfilgrastim use were consistent with the investigators’ risk assessment and international guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4861750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48617502016-05-23 Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy Mądry, Radosław Popławska, Lidia Haslbauer, Ferdinand Šafanda, Martin Ghizdavescu, Doru Benkovicova, Jana Csőszi, Tibor Mihaylov, Georgi Niepel, Daniela Jaeger, Christine Frkanova, Iveta Macovei, Alina Staudigl, Christine Wien Klin Wochenschr Original Article OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and use of pegfilgrastim in cancer patients with high overall risk of FN and to investigate the relationship between granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) guideline adherence and chemotherapy delivery in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and Austria. METHODS: Dose Intensity Evaluation Program and Prophylaxis (DIEPP) was a multicentre, prospective, and observational study of adult patients with breast cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, gastric cancer, and ovarian cancer, who received chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim support and who had an overall risk of FN ≥ 20 %. Physicians assessed patient risk factors and reported their reasons for administering pegfilgrastim. RESULTS: Patients were enrolled from 113 centres in CEE and Austria between August 2010 and July 2013, and data were analysed from 1072 patients. The most common tumour types were breast cancer (50 %) and lymphoma (24 %). FN incidence was 5 % overall. FN occurred in 3 % of patients (28/875) who received pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis (PP) and 13 % of patients (19/142) who received it as secondary prophylaxis (SP); 79 % of FN events in SP patients occurred in the first cycle before pegfilgrastim was administered. The three most frequently chosen reasons for using pegfilgrastim were planned chemotherapy with high FN risk, female gender, and advanced disease. Overall, 40 % of patients received > 90 % of their planned chemotherapy dose within 3 days of the planned schedule. CONCLUSION: FN incidence was relatively low with pegfilgrastim PP in patients with a physician-assessed overall FN risk of ≥ 20 %. The most important reasons for pegfilgrastim use were consistent with the investigators’ risk assessment and international guidelines. Springer Vienna 2016-01-08 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4861750/ /pubmed/26745973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0917-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mądry, Radosław
Popławska, Lidia
Haslbauer, Ferdinand
Šafanda, Martin
Ghizdavescu, Doru
Benkovicova, Jana
Csőszi, Tibor
Mihaylov, Georgi
Niepel, Daniela
Jaeger, Christine
Frkanova, Iveta
Macovei, Alina
Staudigl, Christine
Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy
title Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy
title_full Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy
title_fullStr Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy
title_short Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy
title_sort results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (diepp) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4861750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26745973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0917-1
work_keys_str_mv AT madryradosław resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy
AT popławskalidia resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy
AT haslbauerferdinand resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy
AT safandamartin resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy
AT ghizdavescudoru resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy
AT benkovicovajana resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy
AT csoszitibor resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy
AT mihaylovgeorgi resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy
AT niepeldaniela resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy
AT jaegerchristine resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy
AT frkanovaiveta resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy
AT macoveialina resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy
AT staudiglchristine resultsofaprospectivedoseintensityandneutropeniaprophylaxisevaluationprogrammedieppincancerpatientsatriskoffebrileneutropeniaduetomyelosuppressivechemotherapy