Cargando…

The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership

BACKGROUND: With the recognition of the need for research capacity strengthening for advancing health and development, this research capacity article explores the use of technology enhanced learning in the delivery of a collaborative postgraduate blended Master’s degree in Malawi. Two research quest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byrne, E., Donaldson, L., Manda-Taylor, L., Brugha, R., Matthews, A., MacDonald, S., Mwapasa, V., Petersen, M., Walsh, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27160242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0154-z
_version_ 1782431294257364992
author Byrne, E.
Donaldson, L.
Manda-Taylor, L.
Brugha, R.
Matthews, A.
MacDonald, S.
Mwapasa, V.
Petersen, M.
Walsh, A.
author_facet Byrne, E.
Donaldson, L.
Manda-Taylor, L.
Brugha, R.
Matthews, A.
MacDonald, S.
Mwapasa, V.
Petersen, M.
Walsh, A.
author_sort Byrne, E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the recognition of the need for research capacity strengthening for advancing health and development, this research capacity article explores the use of technology enhanced learning in the delivery of a collaborative postgraduate blended Master’s degree in Malawi. Two research questions are addressed: (i) Can technology enhanced learning be used to develop health research capacity?, and: (ii) How can learning content be designed that is transferrable across different contexts? METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was adopted for the evaluation of technology enhanced learning in the Masters programme. A number of online surveys were administered, student participation in online activities monitored and an independent evaluation of the programme conducted. RESULTS: Remote collaboration and engagement are paramount in the design of a blended learning programme and support was needed for selecting the most appropriate technical tools. Internet access proved problematic despite developing the content around low bandwidth availability and training was required for students and teachers/trainers on the tools used. Varying degrees of engagement with the tools used was recorded, and the support of a learning technologist was needed to navigate through challenges faced. CONCLUSION: Capacity can be built in health research through blended learning programmes. In relation to transferability, the support required institutionally for technology enhanced learning needs to be conceptualised differently from support for face-to-face teaching. Additionally, differences in pedagogical approaches and styles between institutions, as well as existing social norms and values around communication, need to be embedded in the content development if the material is to be used beyond the pilot resource-intensive phase of a project.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4862035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48620352016-05-11 The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership Byrne, E. Donaldson, L. Manda-Taylor, L. Brugha, R. Matthews, A. MacDonald, S. Mwapasa, V. Petersen, M. Walsh, A. Global Health Research BACKGROUND: With the recognition of the need for research capacity strengthening for advancing health and development, this research capacity article explores the use of technology enhanced learning in the delivery of a collaborative postgraduate blended Master’s degree in Malawi. Two research questions are addressed: (i) Can technology enhanced learning be used to develop health research capacity?, and: (ii) How can learning content be designed that is transferrable across different contexts? METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was adopted for the evaluation of technology enhanced learning in the Masters programme. A number of online surveys were administered, student participation in online activities monitored and an independent evaluation of the programme conducted. RESULTS: Remote collaboration and engagement are paramount in the design of a blended learning programme and support was needed for selecting the most appropriate technical tools. Internet access proved problematic despite developing the content around low bandwidth availability and training was required for students and teachers/trainers on the tools used. Varying degrees of engagement with the tools used was recorded, and the support of a learning technologist was needed to navigate through challenges faced. CONCLUSION: Capacity can be built in health research through blended learning programmes. In relation to transferability, the support required institutionally for technology enhanced learning needs to be conceptualised differently from support for face-to-face teaching. Additionally, differences in pedagogical approaches and styles between institutions, as well as existing social norms and values around communication, need to be embedded in the content development if the material is to be used beyond the pilot resource-intensive phase of a project. BioMed Central 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4862035/ /pubmed/27160242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0154-z Text en © Byrne et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Byrne, E.
Donaldson, L.
Manda-Taylor, L.
Brugha, R.
Matthews, A.
MacDonald, S.
Mwapasa, V.
Petersen, M.
Walsh, A.
The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership
title The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership
title_full The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership
title_fullStr The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership
title_full_unstemmed The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership
title_short The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership
title_sort use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27160242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0154-z
work_keys_str_mv AT byrnee theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT donaldsonl theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT mandataylorl theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT brughar theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT matthewsa theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT macdonalds theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT mwapasav theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT petersenm theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT walsha theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT byrnee useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT donaldsonl useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT mandataylorl useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT brughar useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT matthewsa useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT macdonalds useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT mwapasav useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT petersenm useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership
AT walsha useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership