Cargando…
The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership
BACKGROUND: With the recognition of the need for research capacity strengthening for advancing health and development, this research capacity article explores the use of technology enhanced learning in the delivery of a collaborative postgraduate blended Master’s degree in Malawi. Two research quest...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27160242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0154-z |
_version_ | 1782431294257364992 |
---|---|
author | Byrne, E. Donaldson, L. Manda-Taylor, L. Brugha, R. Matthews, A. MacDonald, S. Mwapasa, V. Petersen, M. Walsh, A. |
author_facet | Byrne, E. Donaldson, L. Manda-Taylor, L. Brugha, R. Matthews, A. MacDonald, S. Mwapasa, V. Petersen, M. Walsh, A. |
author_sort | Byrne, E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the recognition of the need for research capacity strengthening for advancing health and development, this research capacity article explores the use of technology enhanced learning in the delivery of a collaborative postgraduate blended Master’s degree in Malawi. Two research questions are addressed: (i) Can technology enhanced learning be used to develop health research capacity?, and: (ii) How can learning content be designed that is transferrable across different contexts? METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was adopted for the evaluation of technology enhanced learning in the Masters programme. A number of online surveys were administered, student participation in online activities monitored and an independent evaluation of the programme conducted. RESULTS: Remote collaboration and engagement are paramount in the design of a blended learning programme and support was needed for selecting the most appropriate technical tools. Internet access proved problematic despite developing the content around low bandwidth availability and training was required for students and teachers/trainers on the tools used. Varying degrees of engagement with the tools used was recorded, and the support of a learning technologist was needed to navigate through challenges faced. CONCLUSION: Capacity can be built in health research through blended learning programmes. In relation to transferability, the support required institutionally for technology enhanced learning needs to be conceptualised differently from support for face-to-face teaching. Additionally, differences in pedagogical approaches and styles between institutions, as well as existing social norms and values around communication, need to be embedded in the content development if the material is to be used beyond the pilot resource-intensive phase of a project. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4862035 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48620352016-05-11 The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership Byrne, E. Donaldson, L. Manda-Taylor, L. Brugha, R. Matthews, A. MacDonald, S. Mwapasa, V. Petersen, M. Walsh, A. Global Health Research BACKGROUND: With the recognition of the need for research capacity strengthening for advancing health and development, this research capacity article explores the use of technology enhanced learning in the delivery of a collaborative postgraduate blended Master’s degree in Malawi. Two research questions are addressed: (i) Can technology enhanced learning be used to develop health research capacity?, and: (ii) How can learning content be designed that is transferrable across different contexts? METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was adopted for the evaluation of technology enhanced learning in the Masters programme. A number of online surveys were administered, student participation in online activities monitored and an independent evaluation of the programme conducted. RESULTS: Remote collaboration and engagement are paramount in the design of a blended learning programme and support was needed for selecting the most appropriate technical tools. Internet access proved problematic despite developing the content around low bandwidth availability and training was required for students and teachers/trainers on the tools used. Varying degrees of engagement with the tools used was recorded, and the support of a learning technologist was needed to navigate through challenges faced. CONCLUSION: Capacity can be built in health research through blended learning programmes. In relation to transferability, the support required institutionally for technology enhanced learning needs to be conceptualised differently from support for face-to-face teaching. Additionally, differences in pedagogical approaches and styles between institutions, as well as existing social norms and values around communication, need to be embedded in the content development if the material is to be used beyond the pilot resource-intensive phase of a project. BioMed Central 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4862035/ /pubmed/27160242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0154-z Text en © Byrne et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Byrne, E. Donaldson, L. Manda-Taylor, L. Brugha, R. Matthews, A. MacDonald, S. Mwapasa, V. Petersen, M. Walsh, A. The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership |
title | The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership |
title_full | The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership |
title_fullStr | The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership |
title_short | The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership |
title_sort | use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27160242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0154-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT byrnee theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT donaldsonl theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT mandataylorl theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT brughar theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT matthewsa theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT macdonalds theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT mwapasav theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT petersenm theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT walsha theuseoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT byrnee useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT donaldsonl useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT mandataylorl useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT brughar useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT matthewsa useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT macdonalds useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT mwapasav useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT petersenm useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership AT walsha useoftechnologyenhancedlearninginhealthresearchcapacitydevelopmentlessonsfromacrosscountryresearchpartnership |