Cargando…

Does galactomannan testing increase diagnostic accuracy for IPA in the ICU? A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: An algorithm for distinguishing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in critically ill patients (AspICU) has been proposed but not tested. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study applying the AspICU protocol to patients with positive Aspergillus culture (PAC group) and thos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schroeder, Maria, Simon, Marcel, Katchanov, Juri, Wijaya, Charles, Rohde, Holger, Christner, Martin, Laqmani, Azien, Wichmann, Dominic, Fuhrmann, Valentin, Kluge, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27160692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1326-1
_version_ 1782431303878049792
author Schroeder, Maria
Simon, Marcel
Katchanov, Juri
Wijaya, Charles
Rohde, Holger
Christner, Martin
Laqmani, Azien
Wichmann, Dominic
Fuhrmann, Valentin
Kluge, Stefan
author_facet Schroeder, Maria
Simon, Marcel
Katchanov, Juri
Wijaya, Charles
Rohde, Holger
Christner, Martin
Laqmani, Azien
Wichmann, Dominic
Fuhrmann, Valentin
Kluge, Stefan
author_sort Schroeder, Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An algorithm for distinguishing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in critically ill patients (AspICU) has been proposed but not tested. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study applying the AspICU protocol to patients with positive Aspergillus culture (PAC group) and those with negative aspergillus culture but positive galactomannan test in respiratory tract samples (only positive galactomannan (OPG group)). Patients underwent a standardized diagnostic workup with bronchoscopy, computed tomography (CT), and galactomannan determination in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). RESULTS: We included 85 patients in the study. Of these, 43 had positive aspergillus cultures and 42 patients had only a positive galactomannan test. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics, underlying conditions or ICU scores between the two groups. The galactomannan titre in BALF was significantly higher in the positive aspergillus culture (PAC) group (enzyme immunoassay (EIA) 5.9, IQR 3.2–5.7) than in the OPG group (EIA 1.7, IQR 0.9–4.5) (p < 0.001). Classic features of IPA were detected on CT in 37.5 % and 36.6 % of patients in the PAC and OPG groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the PAC and the OPG group in relation to AspICU or European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria. A positive aspergillus culture was a stronger trigger for initiating antimycotic treatment than positive BALF galactomannan: 88.4 % of patients in the PAC group were regarded by clinicians as having IPA and received antimycotic treatment as opposed to 59.5 % in the OPG group (p = 0.002). The 180-day mortality was 58.1 % in the PAC group and 59.5 % in the OPG group. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of BALF galactomannan as an additional entry criterion for the AspICU clinical algorithm could increase the diagnostic sensitivity for IPA in ICU patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT01866020) on 27 May 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1326-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4862077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48620772016-05-11 Does galactomannan testing increase diagnostic accuracy for IPA in the ICU? A prospective observational study Schroeder, Maria Simon, Marcel Katchanov, Juri Wijaya, Charles Rohde, Holger Christner, Martin Laqmani, Azien Wichmann, Dominic Fuhrmann, Valentin Kluge, Stefan Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: An algorithm for distinguishing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in critically ill patients (AspICU) has been proposed but not tested. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study applying the AspICU protocol to patients with positive Aspergillus culture (PAC group) and those with negative aspergillus culture but positive galactomannan test in respiratory tract samples (only positive galactomannan (OPG group)). Patients underwent a standardized diagnostic workup with bronchoscopy, computed tomography (CT), and galactomannan determination in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). RESULTS: We included 85 patients in the study. Of these, 43 had positive aspergillus cultures and 42 patients had only a positive galactomannan test. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics, underlying conditions or ICU scores between the two groups. The galactomannan titre in BALF was significantly higher in the positive aspergillus culture (PAC) group (enzyme immunoassay (EIA) 5.9, IQR 3.2–5.7) than in the OPG group (EIA 1.7, IQR 0.9–4.5) (p < 0.001). Classic features of IPA were detected on CT in 37.5 % and 36.6 % of patients in the PAC and OPG groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the PAC and the OPG group in relation to AspICU or European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria. A positive aspergillus culture was a stronger trigger for initiating antimycotic treatment than positive BALF galactomannan: 88.4 % of patients in the PAC group were regarded by clinicians as having IPA and received antimycotic treatment as opposed to 59.5 % in the OPG group (p = 0.002). The 180-day mortality was 58.1 % in the PAC group and 59.5 % in the OPG group. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of BALF galactomannan as an additional entry criterion for the AspICU clinical algorithm could increase the diagnostic sensitivity for IPA in ICU patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT01866020) on 27 May 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1326-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-05-10 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4862077/ /pubmed/27160692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1326-1 Text en © Schroeder et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Schroeder, Maria
Simon, Marcel
Katchanov, Juri
Wijaya, Charles
Rohde, Holger
Christner, Martin
Laqmani, Azien
Wichmann, Dominic
Fuhrmann, Valentin
Kluge, Stefan
Does galactomannan testing increase diagnostic accuracy for IPA in the ICU? A prospective observational study
title Does galactomannan testing increase diagnostic accuracy for IPA in the ICU? A prospective observational study
title_full Does galactomannan testing increase diagnostic accuracy for IPA in the ICU? A prospective observational study
title_fullStr Does galactomannan testing increase diagnostic accuracy for IPA in the ICU? A prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Does galactomannan testing increase diagnostic accuracy for IPA in the ICU? A prospective observational study
title_short Does galactomannan testing increase diagnostic accuracy for IPA in the ICU? A prospective observational study
title_sort does galactomannan testing increase diagnostic accuracy for ipa in the icu? a prospective observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27160692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1326-1
work_keys_str_mv AT schroedermaria doesgalactomannantestingincreasediagnosticaccuracyforipaintheicuaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT simonmarcel doesgalactomannantestingincreasediagnosticaccuracyforipaintheicuaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT katchanovjuri doesgalactomannantestingincreasediagnosticaccuracyforipaintheicuaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT wijayacharles doesgalactomannantestingincreasediagnosticaccuracyforipaintheicuaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT rohdeholger doesgalactomannantestingincreasediagnosticaccuracyforipaintheicuaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT christnermartin doesgalactomannantestingincreasediagnosticaccuracyforipaintheicuaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT laqmaniazien doesgalactomannantestingincreasediagnosticaccuracyforipaintheicuaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT wichmanndominic doesgalactomannantestingincreasediagnosticaccuracyforipaintheicuaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT fuhrmannvalentin doesgalactomannantestingincreasediagnosticaccuracyforipaintheicuaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT klugestefan doesgalactomannantestingincreasediagnosticaccuracyforipaintheicuaprospectiveobservationalstudy