Cargando…

Obstetrician cognitive and affective skills in a diverse academic population

BACKGROUND: Obstetrician cognitive and affective traits have been identified to have relationships with their patients’ perinatal outcomes. The objective was to identify relationships between obstetrician demographic and practice characteristics and physician coping, self-efficacy, anxiety and ambig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yee, Lynn M., Grobman, William A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27161122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0659-4
_version_ 1782431304574304256
author Yee, Lynn M.
Grobman, William A.
author_facet Yee, Lynn M.
Grobman, William A.
author_sort Yee, Lynn M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obstetrician cognitive and affective traits have been identified to have relationships with their patients’ perinatal outcomes. The objective was to identify relationships between obstetrician demographic and practice characteristics and physician coping, self-efficacy, anxiety and ambiguity tolerance. METHODS: Obstetricians at a single institution were surveyed using 5 validated scales measuring coping skills, tolerance for ambiguity, cognitive engagement and trait anxiety. Demographics and practice characteristics were assessed. Chi-square tests, t-tests, ANOVA and linear regression were used to assess relationships between physician characteristics and cognitive traits. RESULTS: Ninety-four physicians participated. Women expressed greater proactive coping than men (p = 0.03) on the Proactive Coping scale. Providers with greater delivery volume expressed lower engagement in cognitive efforts (p = 0.03) on the Need for Cognition scale. Maternal-fetal medicine physicians demonstrated greater ambiguity tolerance (p < 0.01) and cognitive engagement (p = 0.012) than general obstetricians. Differences by specialty persisted after adjustment for potentially confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: Practice type and specialty appeared to be related to several cognitive characteristics. It remains uncertain whether these differences are a cause or a consequence of specialty training and whether they result in differences in obstetric outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4862080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48620802016-05-11 Obstetrician cognitive and affective skills in a diverse academic population Yee, Lynn M. Grobman, William A. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Obstetrician cognitive and affective traits have been identified to have relationships with their patients’ perinatal outcomes. The objective was to identify relationships between obstetrician demographic and practice characteristics and physician coping, self-efficacy, anxiety and ambiguity tolerance. METHODS: Obstetricians at a single institution were surveyed using 5 validated scales measuring coping skills, tolerance for ambiguity, cognitive engagement and trait anxiety. Demographics and practice characteristics were assessed. Chi-square tests, t-tests, ANOVA and linear regression were used to assess relationships between physician characteristics and cognitive traits. RESULTS: Ninety-four physicians participated. Women expressed greater proactive coping than men (p = 0.03) on the Proactive Coping scale. Providers with greater delivery volume expressed lower engagement in cognitive efforts (p = 0.03) on the Need for Cognition scale. Maternal-fetal medicine physicians demonstrated greater ambiguity tolerance (p < 0.01) and cognitive engagement (p = 0.012) than general obstetricians. Differences by specialty persisted after adjustment for potentially confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: Practice type and specialty appeared to be related to several cognitive characteristics. It remains uncertain whether these differences are a cause or a consequence of specialty training and whether they result in differences in obstetric outcomes. BioMed Central 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4862080/ /pubmed/27161122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0659-4 Text en © Yee and Grobman. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yee, Lynn M.
Grobman, William A.
Obstetrician cognitive and affective skills in a diverse academic population
title Obstetrician cognitive and affective skills in a diverse academic population
title_full Obstetrician cognitive and affective skills in a diverse academic population
title_fullStr Obstetrician cognitive and affective skills in a diverse academic population
title_full_unstemmed Obstetrician cognitive and affective skills in a diverse academic population
title_short Obstetrician cognitive and affective skills in a diverse academic population
title_sort obstetrician cognitive and affective skills in a diverse academic population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27161122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0659-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yeelynnm obstetriciancognitiveandaffectiveskillsinadiverseacademicpopulation
AT grobmanwilliama obstetriciancognitiveandaffectiveskillsinadiverseacademicpopulation