Cargando…

Determining breast cancer histological grade from RNA-sequencing data

BACKGROUND: The histologic grade (HG) of breast cancer is an established prognostic factor. The grade is usually reported on a scale ranging from 1 to 3, where grade 3 tumours are the most aggressive. However, grade 2 is associated with an intermediate risk of recurrence, and carries limited informa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Mei, Klevebring, Daniel, Lindberg, Johan, Czene, Kamila, Grönberg, Henrik, Rantalainen, Mattias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27165105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0710-8
_version_ 1782431327500369920
author Wang, Mei
Klevebring, Daniel
Lindberg, Johan
Czene, Kamila
Grönberg, Henrik
Rantalainen, Mattias
author_facet Wang, Mei
Klevebring, Daniel
Lindberg, Johan
Czene, Kamila
Grönberg, Henrik
Rantalainen, Mattias
author_sort Wang, Mei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The histologic grade (HG) of breast cancer is an established prognostic factor. The grade is usually reported on a scale ranging from 1 to 3, where grade 3 tumours are the most aggressive. However, grade 2 is associated with an intermediate risk of recurrence, and carries limited information for clinical decision-making. Patients classified as grade 2 are at risk of both under- and over-treatment. METHODS: RNA-sequencing analysis was conducted in a cohort of 275 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. Multivariate prediction models were developed to classify tumours into high and low transcriptomic grade (TG) based on gene- and isoform-level expression data from RNA-sequencing. HG2 tumours were reclassified according to the prediction model and a recurrence-free survival analysis was performed by the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model to assess to what extent the TG model could be used to stratify patients. The prediction model was validated in N=487 breast cancer cases from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data set. Differentially expressed genes and isoforms associated with HGs were analysed using linear models. RESULTS: The classification of grade 1 and grade 3 tumours based on RNA-sequencing data achieved high accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.97). The association between recurrence-free survival rate and HGs was confirmed in the study population (hazard ratio of grade 3 versus 1 was 2.62 with 95 % confidence interval = 1.04–6.61). The TG model enabled us to reclassify grade 2 tumours as high TG and low TG gene or isoform grade. The risk of recurrence in the high TG group of grade 2 tumours was higher than in low TG group (hazard ratio = 2.43, 95 % confidence interval = 1.13–5.20). We found 8200 genes and 13,809 isoforms that were differentially expressed between HG1 and HG3 breast cancer tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Gene- and isoform-level expression data from RNA-sequencing could be utilised to differentiate HG1 and HG3 tumours with high accuracy. We identified a large number of novel genes and isoforms associated with HG. Grade 2 tumours could be reclassified as high and low TG, which has the potential to reduce over- and under-treatment if implemented clinically. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0710-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4862203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48622032016-05-11 Determining breast cancer histological grade from RNA-sequencing data Wang, Mei Klevebring, Daniel Lindberg, Johan Czene, Kamila Grönberg, Henrik Rantalainen, Mattias Breast Cancer Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The histologic grade (HG) of breast cancer is an established prognostic factor. The grade is usually reported on a scale ranging from 1 to 3, where grade 3 tumours are the most aggressive. However, grade 2 is associated with an intermediate risk of recurrence, and carries limited information for clinical decision-making. Patients classified as grade 2 are at risk of both under- and over-treatment. METHODS: RNA-sequencing analysis was conducted in a cohort of 275 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. Multivariate prediction models were developed to classify tumours into high and low transcriptomic grade (TG) based on gene- and isoform-level expression data from RNA-sequencing. HG2 tumours were reclassified according to the prediction model and a recurrence-free survival analysis was performed by the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model to assess to what extent the TG model could be used to stratify patients. The prediction model was validated in N=487 breast cancer cases from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data set. Differentially expressed genes and isoforms associated with HGs were analysed using linear models. RESULTS: The classification of grade 1 and grade 3 tumours based on RNA-sequencing data achieved high accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.97). The association between recurrence-free survival rate and HGs was confirmed in the study population (hazard ratio of grade 3 versus 1 was 2.62 with 95 % confidence interval = 1.04–6.61). The TG model enabled us to reclassify grade 2 tumours as high TG and low TG gene or isoform grade. The risk of recurrence in the high TG group of grade 2 tumours was higher than in low TG group (hazard ratio = 2.43, 95 % confidence interval = 1.13–5.20). We found 8200 genes and 13,809 isoforms that were differentially expressed between HG1 and HG3 breast cancer tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Gene- and isoform-level expression data from RNA-sequencing could be utilised to differentiate HG1 and HG3 tumours with high accuracy. We identified a large number of novel genes and isoforms associated with HG. Grade 2 tumours could be reclassified as high and low TG, which has the potential to reduce over- and under-treatment if implemented clinically. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0710-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-05-10 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4862203/ /pubmed/27165105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0710-8 Text en © Wang et al. 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Mei
Klevebring, Daniel
Lindberg, Johan
Czene, Kamila
Grönberg, Henrik
Rantalainen, Mattias
Determining breast cancer histological grade from RNA-sequencing data
title Determining breast cancer histological grade from RNA-sequencing data
title_full Determining breast cancer histological grade from RNA-sequencing data
title_fullStr Determining breast cancer histological grade from RNA-sequencing data
title_full_unstemmed Determining breast cancer histological grade from RNA-sequencing data
title_short Determining breast cancer histological grade from RNA-sequencing data
title_sort determining breast cancer histological grade from rna-sequencing data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27165105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0710-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wangmei determiningbreastcancerhistologicalgradefromrnasequencingdata
AT klevebringdaniel determiningbreastcancerhistologicalgradefromrnasequencingdata
AT lindbergjohan determiningbreastcancerhistologicalgradefromrnasequencingdata
AT czenekamila determiningbreastcancerhistologicalgradefromrnasequencingdata
AT gronberghenrik determiningbreastcancerhistologicalgradefromrnasequencingdata
AT rantalainenmattias determiningbreastcancerhistologicalgradefromrnasequencingdata