Cargando…

Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients

PURPOSE: To identify inexpensive, noninvasive, portable, clinical assessment tools that can be used to assess functional performance measures that may put older patients at risk for falls such as balance, handgrip strength, and lumbopelvic control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty fragility fracture pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ames, Tyler D, Wee, Corinne E, Le, Khoi M, Wang, Tiffany L, Bishop, Julie Y, Phieffer, Laura S, Quatman, Carmen E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217738
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S102047
_version_ 1782431354354401280
author Ames, Tyler D
Wee, Corinne E
Le, Khoi M
Wang, Tiffany L
Bishop, Julie Y
Phieffer, Laura S
Quatman, Carmen E
author_facet Ames, Tyler D
Wee, Corinne E
Le, Khoi M
Wang, Tiffany L
Bishop, Julie Y
Phieffer, Laura S
Quatman, Carmen E
author_sort Ames, Tyler D
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To identify inexpensive, noninvasive, portable, clinical assessment tools that can be used to assess functional performance measures that may put older patients at risk for falls such as balance, handgrip strength, and lumbopelvic control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty fragility fracture patients and 21 healthy control subjects were evaluated using clinical assessment tools (Nintendo Wii Balance Board [WBB], a handheld dynamometer, and an application for the Apple iPod Touch, the Level Belt) that measure functional performance during activity of daily living tasks. The main outcome measurements were balance (WBB), handgrip strength (handheld dynamometer), and lumbopelvic control (iPod Touch Level Belt), which were compared between fragility fracture patients and healthy controls. RESULTS: Fragility fracture patients had lower scores on the vertical component of the WBB Torso Twist task (P=0.042) and greater medial–lateral lumbopelvic sway during a 40 m walk (P=0.026) when compared to healthy controls. Unexpectedly, the fracture patients had significantly higher scores on the left leg (P=0.020) and total components (P=0.010) of the WBB Single Leg Stand task as well as less faults during the left Single Leg Stand task (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: The clinical assessment tools utilized in this study are relatively inexpensive and portable tools of performance measures capable of detecting differences in postural sway between fragility fracture patients and controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4862340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48623402016-05-23 Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients Ames, Tyler D Wee, Corinne E Le, Khoi M Wang, Tiffany L Bishop, Julie Y Phieffer, Laura S Quatman, Carmen E Clin Interv Aging Original Research PURPOSE: To identify inexpensive, noninvasive, portable, clinical assessment tools that can be used to assess functional performance measures that may put older patients at risk for falls such as balance, handgrip strength, and lumbopelvic control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty fragility fracture patients and 21 healthy control subjects were evaluated using clinical assessment tools (Nintendo Wii Balance Board [WBB], a handheld dynamometer, and an application for the Apple iPod Touch, the Level Belt) that measure functional performance during activity of daily living tasks. The main outcome measurements were balance (WBB), handgrip strength (handheld dynamometer), and lumbopelvic control (iPod Touch Level Belt), which were compared between fragility fracture patients and healthy controls. RESULTS: Fragility fracture patients had lower scores on the vertical component of the WBB Torso Twist task (P=0.042) and greater medial–lateral lumbopelvic sway during a 40 m walk (P=0.026) when compared to healthy controls. Unexpectedly, the fracture patients had significantly higher scores on the left leg (P=0.020) and total components (P=0.010) of the WBB Single Leg Stand task as well as less faults during the left Single Leg Stand task (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: The clinical assessment tools utilized in this study are relatively inexpensive and portable tools of performance measures capable of detecting differences in postural sway between fragility fracture patients and controls. Dove Medical Press 2016-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4862340/ /pubmed/27217738 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S102047 Text en © 2016 Ames et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ames, Tyler D
Wee, Corinne E
Le, Khoi M
Wang, Tiffany L
Bishop, Julie Y
Phieffer, Laura S
Quatman, Carmen E
Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients
title Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients
title_full Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients
title_fullStr Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients
title_full_unstemmed Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients
title_short Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients
title_sort clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217738
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S102047
work_keys_str_mv AT amestylerd clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients
AT weecorinnee clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients
AT lekhoim clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients
AT wangtiffanyl clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients
AT bishopjuliey clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients
AT phiefferlauras clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients
AT quatmancarmene clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients