Cargando…
Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients
PURPOSE: To identify inexpensive, noninvasive, portable, clinical assessment tools that can be used to assess functional performance measures that may put older patients at risk for falls such as balance, handgrip strength, and lumbopelvic control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty fragility fracture pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217738 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S102047 |
_version_ | 1782431354354401280 |
---|---|
author | Ames, Tyler D Wee, Corinne E Le, Khoi M Wang, Tiffany L Bishop, Julie Y Phieffer, Laura S Quatman, Carmen E |
author_facet | Ames, Tyler D Wee, Corinne E Le, Khoi M Wang, Tiffany L Bishop, Julie Y Phieffer, Laura S Quatman, Carmen E |
author_sort | Ames, Tyler D |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To identify inexpensive, noninvasive, portable, clinical assessment tools that can be used to assess functional performance measures that may put older patients at risk for falls such as balance, handgrip strength, and lumbopelvic control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty fragility fracture patients and 21 healthy control subjects were evaluated using clinical assessment tools (Nintendo Wii Balance Board [WBB], a handheld dynamometer, and an application for the Apple iPod Touch, the Level Belt) that measure functional performance during activity of daily living tasks. The main outcome measurements were balance (WBB), handgrip strength (handheld dynamometer), and lumbopelvic control (iPod Touch Level Belt), which were compared between fragility fracture patients and healthy controls. RESULTS: Fragility fracture patients had lower scores on the vertical component of the WBB Torso Twist task (P=0.042) and greater medial–lateral lumbopelvic sway during a 40 m walk (P=0.026) when compared to healthy controls. Unexpectedly, the fracture patients had significantly higher scores on the left leg (P=0.020) and total components (P=0.010) of the WBB Single Leg Stand task as well as less faults during the left Single Leg Stand task (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: The clinical assessment tools utilized in this study are relatively inexpensive and portable tools of performance measures capable of detecting differences in postural sway between fragility fracture patients and controls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4862340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48623402016-05-23 Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients Ames, Tyler D Wee, Corinne E Le, Khoi M Wang, Tiffany L Bishop, Julie Y Phieffer, Laura S Quatman, Carmen E Clin Interv Aging Original Research PURPOSE: To identify inexpensive, noninvasive, portable, clinical assessment tools that can be used to assess functional performance measures that may put older patients at risk for falls such as balance, handgrip strength, and lumbopelvic control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty fragility fracture patients and 21 healthy control subjects were evaluated using clinical assessment tools (Nintendo Wii Balance Board [WBB], a handheld dynamometer, and an application for the Apple iPod Touch, the Level Belt) that measure functional performance during activity of daily living tasks. The main outcome measurements were balance (WBB), handgrip strength (handheld dynamometer), and lumbopelvic control (iPod Touch Level Belt), which were compared between fragility fracture patients and healthy controls. RESULTS: Fragility fracture patients had lower scores on the vertical component of the WBB Torso Twist task (P=0.042) and greater medial–lateral lumbopelvic sway during a 40 m walk (P=0.026) when compared to healthy controls. Unexpectedly, the fracture patients had significantly higher scores on the left leg (P=0.020) and total components (P=0.010) of the WBB Single Leg Stand task as well as less faults during the left Single Leg Stand task (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: The clinical assessment tools utilized in this study are relatively inexpensive and portable tools of performance measures capable of detecting differences in postural sway between fragility fracture patients and controls. Dove Medical Press 2016-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4862340/ /pubmed/27217738 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S102047 Text en © 2016 Ames et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ames, Tyler D Wee, Corinne E Le, Khoi M Wang, Tiffany L Bishop, Julie Y Phieffer, Laura S Quatman, Carmen E Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients |
title | Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients |
title_full | Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients |
title_fullStr | Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients |
title_short | Clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients |
title_sort | clinical assessment tools identify functional deficits in fragility fracture patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217738 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S102047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amestylerd clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients AT weecorinnee clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients AT lekhoim clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients AT wangtiffanyl clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients AT bishopjuliey clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients AT phiefferlauras clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients AT quatmancarmene clinicalassessmenttoolsidentifyfunctionaldeficitsinfragilityfracturepatients |