Cargando…

A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease

BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED), a chronic disorder affecting the tear film and lacrimal functional unit, is a widely prevalent condition associated with significant burden and unmet treatment needs. Since specific neural circuits play an important role in maintaining ocular surface health, microe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friedman, Neil J, Butron, Karla, Robledo, Nora, Loudin, James, Baba, Stephanie N, Chayet, Arturo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217719
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S101716
_version_ 1782431360679411712
author Friedman, Neil J
Butron, Karla
Robledo, Nora
Loudin, James
Baba, Stephanie N
Chayet, Arturo
author_facet Friedman, Neil J
Butron, Karla
Robledo, Nora
Loudin, James
Baba, Stephanie N
Chayet, Arturo
author_sort Friedman, Neil J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED), a chronic disorder affecting the tear film and lacrimal functional unit, is a widely prevalent condition associated with significant burden and unmet treatment needs. Since specific neural circuits play an important role in maintaining ocular surface health, microelectrical stimulation of these pathways could present a promising new approach to treating DED. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nasal electrical stimulation in patients with DED. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, single-arm, nonrandomized pilot study included 40 patients with mild to severe DED. After undergoing two screening visits, enrolled subjects were provided with a nasal stimulation device and instructed to use it at home four times daily (or more often as needed). Follow-up assessments were conducted up to day 180. The primary efficacy endpoint was the difference between unstimulated and stimulated tear production quantified by Schirmer scores. Additional efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in corneal and conjunctival staining, symptoms evaluated on a Visual Analog Scale, and Ocular Surface Disease Index scores. Safety parameters included adverse event (AE) rates, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and endoscopic nasal examinations. RESULTS: Mean stimulated Schirmer scores were significantly higher than the unstimulated scores at all visits, and corneal and conjunctival staining and symptom scores from baseline to day 180 were significantly reduced. No serious device-related AEs and nine nonserious AEs (three device-related) were reported. Intraocular pressure remained stable and most subjects showed little or no change in visual acuity at days 30 and 180. No significant findings from other clinical examinations were noted. CONCLUSION: Neurostimulation of the nasolacrimal pathway is a safe and effective means of increasing tear production and reducing symptoms of dry eye in patients with DED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4862385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48623852016-05-23 A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease Friedman, Neil J Butron, Karla Robledo, Nora Loudin, James Baba, Stephanie N Chayet, Arturo Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED), a chronic disorder affecting the tear film and lacrimal functional unit, is a widely prevalent condition associated with significant burden and unmet treatment needs. Since specific neural circuits play an important role in maintaining ocular surface health, microelectrical stimulation of these pathways could present a promising new approach to treating DED. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nasal electrical stimulation in patients with DED. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, single-arm, nonrandomized pilot study included 40 patients with mild to severe DED. After undergoing two screening visits, enrolled subjects were provided with a nasal stimulation device and instructed to use it at home four times daily (or more often as needed). Follow-up assessments were conducted up to day 180. The primary efficacy endpoint was the difference between unstimulated and stimulated tear production quantified by Schirmer scores. Additional efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in corneal and conjunctival staining, symptoms evaluated on a Visual Analog Scale, and Ocular Surface Disease Index scores. Safety parameters included adverse event (AE) rates, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and endoscopic nasal examinations. RESULTS: Mean stimulated Schirmer scores were significantly higher than the unstimulated scores at all visits, and corneal and conjunctival staining and symptom scores from baseline to day 180 were significantly reduced. No serious device-related AEs and nine nonserious AEs (three device-related) were reported. Intraocular pressure remained stable and most subjects showed little or no change in visual acuity at days 30 and 180. No significant findings from other clinical examinations were noted. CONCLUSION: Neurostimulation of the nasolacrimal pathway is a safe and effective means of increasing tear production and reducing symptoms of dry eye in patients with DED. Dove Medical Press 2016-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4862385/ /pubmed/27217719 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S101716 Text en © 2016 Friedman et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Friedman, Neil J
Butron, Karla
Robledo, Nora
Loudin, James
Baba, Stephanie N
Chayet, Arturo
A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease
title A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease
title_full A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease
title_fullStr A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease
title_full_unstemmed A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease
title_short A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease
title_sort nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217719
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S101716
work_keys_str_mv AT friedmanneilj anonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease
AT butronkarla anonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease
AT robledonora anonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease
AT loudinjames anonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease
AT babastephanien anonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease
AT chayetarturo anonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease
AT friedmanneilj nonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease
AT butronkarla nonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease
AT robledonora nonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease
AT loudinjames nonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease
AT babastephanien nonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease
AT chayetarturo nonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease