Cargando…
A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease
BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED), a chronic disorder affecting the tear film and lacrimal functional unit, is a widely prevalent condition associated with significant burden and unmet treatment needs. Since specific neural circuits play an important role in maintaining ocular surface health, microe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217719 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S101716 |
_version_ | 1782431360679411712 |
---|---|
author | Friedman, Neil J Butron, Karla Robledo, Nora Loudin, James Baba, Stephanie N Chayet, Arturo |
author_facet | Friedman, Neil J Butron, Karla Robledo, Nora Loudin, James Baba, Stephanie N Chayet, Arturo |
author_sort | Friedman, Neil J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED), a chronic disorder affecting the tear film and lacrimal functional unit, is a widely prevalent condition associated with significant burden and unmet treatment needs. Since specific neural circuits play an important role in maintaining ocular surface health, microelectrical stimulation of these pathways could present a promising new approach to treating DED. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nasal electrical stimulation in patients with DED. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, single-arm, nonrandomized pilot study included 40 patients with mild to severe DED. After undergoing two screening visits, enrolled subjects were provided with a nasal stimulation device and instructed to use it at home four times daily (or more often as needed). Follow-up assessments were conducted up to day 180. The primary efficacy endpoint was the difference between unstimulated and stimulated tear production quantified by Schirmer scores. Additional efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in corneal and conjunctival staining, symptoms evaluated on a Visual Analog Scale, and Ocular Surface Disease Index scores. Safety parameters included adverse event (AE) rates, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and endoscopic nasal examinations. RESULTS: Mean stimulated Schirmer scores were significantly higher than the unstimulated scores at all visits, and corneal and conjunctival staining and symptom scores from baseline to day 180 were significantly reduced. No serious device-related AEs and nine nonserious AEs (three device-related) were reported. Intraocular pressure remained stable and most subjects showed little or no change in visual acuity at days 30 and 180. No significant findings from other clinical examinations were noted. CONCLUSION: Neurostimulation of the nasolacrimal pathway is a safe and effective means of increasing tear production and reducing symptoms of dry eye in patients with DED. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4862385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48623852016-05-23 A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease Friedman, Neil J Butron, Karla Robledo, Nora Loudin, James Baba, Stephanie N Chayet, Arturo Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED), a chronic disorder affecting the tear film and lacrimal functional unit, is a widely prevalent condition associated with significant burden and unmet treatment needs. Since specific neural circuits play an important role in maintaining ocular surface health, microelectrical stimulation of these pathways could present a promising new approach to treating DED. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nasal electrical stimulation in patients with DED. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, single-arm, nonrandomized pilot study included 40 patients with mild to severe DED. After undergoing two screening visits, enrolled subjects were provided with a nasal stimulation device and instructed to use it at home four times daily (or more often as needed). Follow-up assessments were conducted up to day 180. The primary efficacy endpoint was the difference between unstimulated and stimulated tear production quantified by Schirmer scores. Additional efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in corneal and conjunctival staining, symptoms evaluated on a Visual Analog Scale, and Ocular Surface Disease Index scores. Safety parameters included adverse event (AE) rates, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and endoscopic nasal examinations. RESULTS: Mean stimulated Schirmer scores were significantly higher than the unstimulated scores at all visits, and corneal and conjunctival staining and symptom scores from baseline to day 180 were significantly reduced. No serious device-related AEs and nine nonserious AEs (three device-related) were reported. Intraocular pressure remained stable and most subjects showed little or no change in visual acuity at days 30 and 180. No significant findings from other clinical examinations were noted. CONCLUSION: Neurostimulation of the nasolacrimal pathway is a safe and effective means of increasing tear production and reducing symptoms of dry eye in patients with DED. Dove Medical Press 2016-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4862385/ /pubmed/27217719 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S101716 Text en © 2016 Friedman et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Friedman, Neil J Butron, Karla Robledo, Nora Loudin, James Baba, Stephanie N Chayet, Arturo A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease |
title | A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease |
title_full | A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease |
title_fullStr | A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease |
title_full_unstemmed | A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease |
title_short | A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease |
title_sort | nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217719 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S101716 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT friedmanneilj anonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease AT butronkarla anonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease AT robledonora anonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease AT loudinjames anonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease AT babastephanien anonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease AT chayetarturo anonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease AT friedmanneilj nonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease AT butronkarla nonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease AT robledonora nonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease AT loudinjames nonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease AT babastephanien nonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease AT chayetarturo nonrandomizedopenlabelstudytoevaluatetheeffectofnasalstimulationontearproductioninsubjectswithdryeyedisease |