Cargando…
High throughput preparation of fly genomic DNA in 96-well format using a paint-shaker
Sample homogenization is an essential step for genomic DNA extraction, with multiple downstream applications in Molecular Biology. Genotyping hundreds or thousands of samples requires an automation of this homogenization step, and high throughput homogenizer equipment currently costs 7000 euros or m...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2015.1137401 |
_version_ | 1782431362746155008 |
---|---|
author | Lang, Michael Nagy, Olga Lang, Claus Orgogozo, Virginie |
author_facet | Lang, Michael Nagy, Olga Lang, Claus Orgogozo, Virginie |
author_sort | Lang, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sample homogenization is an essential step for genomic DNA extraction, with multiple downstream applications in Molecular Biology. Genotyping hundreds or thousands of samples requires an automation of this homogenization step, and high throughput homogenizer equipment currently costs 7000 euros or more. We present an apparatus for homogenization of individual Drosophila adult flies in 96-well micro-titer dishes, which was built from a small portable paint-shaker (F5 portable paint-shaker, Ushake). Single flies are disrupted in each well that contains extraction buffer and a 4-mm metal ball. Our apparatus can hold up to five 96-well micro-titer plates. Construction of the homogenizer apparatus takes about 3–4 days, and all equipment can be obtained from a home improvement store. The total material cost is approximately 700 euros including the paint-shaker. We tested the performance of our apparatus using the ZR-96 Quick-gDNA™ kit (Zymo Research) homogenization buffer and achieved nearly complete tissue homogenization after 15 minutes of shaking. PCR tests did not detect any cross contamination between samples of neighboring wells. We obtained on average 138 ng of genomic DNA per fly, and DNA quality was adequate for standard PCR applications. In principle, our tissue homogenizer can be used for isolation of DNA suitable for library production and high throughput genotyping by Multiplexed Shotgun Genotyping (MSG), as well as RNA isolation from single flies. The sample adapter can also hold and shake other items, such as centrifuge tubes (15–50 mL) or small bottles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4862422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48624222016-05-23 High throughput preparation of fly genomic DNA in 96-well format using a paint-shaker Lang, Michael Nagy, Olga Lang, Claus Orgogozo, Virginie Fly (Austin) Methods and Technical Advances Sample homogenization is an essential step for genomic DNA extraction, with multiple downstream applications in Molecular Biology. Genotyping hundreds or thousands of samples requires an automation of this homogenization step, and high throughput homogenizer equipment currently costs 7000 euros or more. We present an apparatus for homogenization of individual Drosophila adult flies in 96-well micro-titer dishes, which was built from a small portable paint-shaker (F5 portable paint-shaker, Ushake). Single flies are disrupted in each well that contains extraction buffer and a 4-mm metal ball. Our apparatus can hold up to five 96-well micro-titer plates. Construction of the homogenizer apparatus takes about 3–4 days, and all equipment can be obtained from a home improvement store. The total material cost is approximately 700 euros including the paint-shaker. We tested the performance of our apparatus using the ZR-96 Quick-gDNA™ kit (Zymo Research) homogenization buffer and achieved nearly complete tissue homogenization after 15 minutes of shaking. PCR tests did not detect any cross contamination between samples of neighboring wells. We obtained on average 138 ng of genomic DNA per fly, and DNA quality was adequate for standard PCR applications. In principle, our tissue homogenizer can be used for isolation of DNA suitable for library production and high throughput genotyping by Multiplexed Shotgun Genotyping (MSG), as well as RNA isolation from single flies. The sample adapter can also hold and shake other items, such as centrifuge tubes (15–50 mL) or small bottles. Taylor & Francis 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4862422/ /pubmed/26818699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2015.1137401 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. |
spellingShingle | Methods and Technical Advances Lang, Michael Nagy, Olga Lang, Claus Orgogozo, Virginie High throughput preparation of fly genomic DNA in 96-well format using a paint-shaker |
title | High throughput preparation of fly genomic DNA in 96-well format using a paint-shaker |
title_full | High throughput preparation of fly genomic DNA in 96-well format using a paint-shaker |
title_fullStr | High throughput preparation of fly genomic DNA in 96-well format using a paint-shaker |
title_full_unstemmed | High throughput preparation of fly genomic DNA in 96-well format using a paint-shaker |
title_short | High throughput preparation of fly genomic DNA in 96-well format using a paint-shaker |
title_sort | high throughput preparation of fly genomic dna in 96-well format using a paint-shaker |
topic | Methods and Technical Advances |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2015.1137401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langmichael highthroughputpreparationofflygenomicdnain96wellformatusingapaintshaker AT nagyolga highthroughputpreparationofflygenomicdnain96wellformatusingapaintshaker AT langclaus highthroughputpreparationofflygenomicdnain96wellformatusingapaintshaker AT orgogozovirginie highthroughputpreparationofflygenomicdnain96wellformatusingapaintshaker |