Cargando…

An ingested mobile phone in the stomach may not be amenable to safe endoscopic removal using current therapeutic devices: A case report

INTRODUCTION: This case report is intended to inform clinicians, endoscopists, policy makers and industry of our experience in the management of a rare case of mobile phone ingestion. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 29-year-old prisoner presented to the Emergency Department with vomiting, ten hours after he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obinwa, Obinna, Cooper, David, O’Riordan, James M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27064743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.03.043
_version_ 1782431364627300352
author Obinwa, Obinna
Cooper, David
O’Riordan, James M.
author_facet Obinwa, Obinna
Cooper, David
O’Riordan, James M.
author_sort Obinwa, Obinna
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This case report is intended to inform clinicians, endoscopists, policy makers and industry of our experience in the management of a rare case of mobile phone ingestion. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 29-year-old prisoner presented to the Emergency Department with vomiting, ten hours after he claimed to have swallowed a mobile phone. Clinical examination was unremarkable. Both initial and repeat abdominal radiographs eight hours later confirmed that the foreign body remained in situ in the stomach and had not progressed along the gastrointestinal tract. Based on these findings, upper endoscopy was performed under general anaesthesia. The object could not be aligned correctly to accommodate endoscopic removal using current retrieval devices. Following unsuccessful endoscopy, an upper midline laparotomy was performed and the phone was delivered through an anterior gastrotomy, away from the pylorus. The patient made an uneventful recovery and underwent psychological counselling prior to discharge. DISCUSSION: In this case report, the use of endoscopy in the management when a conservative approach fails is questioned. Can the current endoscopic retrieval devices be improved to limit the need for surgical interventions in future cases? CONCLUSION: An ingested mobile phone in the stomach may not be amenable for removal using the current endoscopic retrieval devices. Improvements in overtubes or additional modifications of existing retrieval devices to ensure adequate alignment for removal without injuring the oesophagus are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4862444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48624442016-05-18 An ingested mobile phone in the stomach may not be amenable to safe endoscopic removal using current therapeutic devices: A case report Obinwa, Obinna Cooper, David O’Riordan, James M. Int J Surg Case Rep Case Report INTRODUCTION: This case report is intended to inform clinicians, endoscopists, policy makers and industry of our experience in the management of a rare case of mobile phone ingestion. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 29-year-old prisoner presented to the Emergency Department with vomiting, ten hours after he claimed to have swallowed a mobile phone. Clinical examination was unremarkable. Both initial and repeat abdominal radiographs eight hours later confirmed that the foreign body remained in situ in the stomach and had not progressed along the gastrointestinal tract. Based on these findings, upper endoscopy was performed under general anaesthesia. The object could not be aligned correctly to accommodate endoscopic removal using current retrieval devices. Following unsuccessful endoscopy, an upper midline laparotomy was performed and the phone was delivered through an anterior gastrotomy, away from the pylorus. The patient made an uneventful recovery and underwent psychological counselling prior to discharge. DISCUSSION: In this case report, the use of endoscopy in the management when a conservative approach fails is questioned. Can the current endoscopic retrieval devices be improved to limit the need for surgical interventions in future cases? CONCLUSION: An ingested mobile phone in the stomach may not be amenable for removal using the current endoscopic retrieval devices. Improvements in overtubes or additional modifications of existing retrieval devices to ensure adequate alignment for removal without injuring the oesophagus are needed. Elsevier 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4862444/ /pubmed/27064743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.03.043 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Obinwa, Obinna
Cooper, David
O’Riordan, James M.
An ingested mobile phone in the stomach may not be amenable to safe endoscopic removal using current therapeutic devices: A case report
title An ingested mobile phone in the stomach may not be amenable to safe endoscopic removal using current therapeutic devices: A case report
title_full An ingested mobile phone in the stomach may not be amenable to safe endoscopic removal using current therapeutic devices: A case report
title_fullStr An ingested mobile phone in the stomach may not be amenable to safe endoscopic removal using current therapeutic devices: A case report
title_full_unstemmed An ingested mobile phone in the stomach may not be amenable to safe endoscopic removal using current therapeutic devices: A case report
title_short An ingested mobile phone in the stomach may not be amenable to safe endoscopic removal using current therapeutic devices: A case report
title_sort ingested mobile phone in the stomach may not be amenable to safe endoscopic removal using current therapeutic devices: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27064743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.03.043
work_keys_str_mv AT obinwaobinna aningestedmobilephoneinthestomachmaynotbeamenabletosafeendoscopicremovalusingcurrenttherapeuticdevicesacasereport
AT cooperdavid aningestedmobilephoneinthestomachmaynotbeamenabletosafeendoscopicremovalusingcurrenttherapeuticdevicesacasereport
AT oriordanjamesm aningestedmobilephoneinthestomachmaynotbeamenabletosafeendoscopicremovalusingcurrenttherapeuticdevicesacasereport
AT obinwaobinna ingestedmobilephoneinthestomachmaynotbeamenabletosafeendoscopicremovalusingcurrenttherapeuticdevicesacasereport
AT cooperdavid ingestedmobilephoneinthestomachmaynotbeamenabletosafeendoscopicremovalusingcurrenttherapeuticdevicesacasereport
AT oriordanjamesm ingestedmobilephoneinthestomachmaynotbeamenabletosafeendoscopicremovalusingcurrenttherapeuticdevicesacasereport