Cargando…

Developing an Algorithm to Identify History of Cancer Using Electronic Medical Records

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop an algorithm to identify Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) members with a history of cancer. BACKGROUND: Tumor registries are used with high precision to identify incident cancer, but are not designed to capture prevalent cancer with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clarke, Christina L., Feigelson, Heather S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AcademyHealth 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195308
http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1209
_version_ 1782431386408321024
author Clarke, Christina L.
Feigelson, Heather S.
author_facet Clarke, Christina L.
Feigelson, Heather S.
author_sort Clarke, Christina L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop an algorithm to identify Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) members with a history of cancer. BACKGROUND: Tumor registries are used with high precision to identify incident cancer, but are not designed to capture prevalent cancer within a population. We sought to identify a cohort of adults with no history of cancer, and thus, we could not rely solely on the tumor registry. METHODS: We included all KPCO members between the ages of 40–75 years who were continuously enrolled during 2013 (N=201,787). Data from the tumor registry, chemotherapy files, inpatient and outpatient claims were used to create an algorithm to identify members with a high likelihood of cancer. We validated the algorithm using chart review and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for occurrence of cancer. FINDINGS: The final version of the algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 100 percent and specificity of 84.6 percent for identifying cancer. If we relied on the tumor registry alone, 47 percent of those with a history of cancer would have been missed. DISCUSSION: Using the tumor registry alone to identify a cohort of patients with prior cancer is not sufficient. In the final version of the algorithm, the sensitivity and PPV were improved when a diagnosis code for cancer was required to accompany oncology visits or chemotherapy administration. CONCLUSION: Electronic medical record (EMR) data can be used effectively in combination with data from the tumor registry to identify health plan members with a history of cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4862761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AcademyHealth
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48627612016-05-18 Developing an Algorithm to Identify History of Cancer Using Electronic Medical Records Clarke, Christina L. Feigelson, Heather S. EGEMS (Wash DC) Articles INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop an algorithm to identify Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) members with a history of cancer. BACKGROUND: Tumor registries are used with high precision to identify incident cancer, but are not designed to capture prevalent cancer within a population. We sought to identify a cohort of adults with no history of cancer, and thus, we could not rely solely on the tumor registry. METHODS: We included all KPCO members between the ages of 40–75 years who were continuously enrolled during 2013 (N=201,787). Data from the tumor registry, chemotherapy files, inpatient and outpatient claims were used to create an algorithm to identify members with a high likelihood of cancer. We validated the algorithm using chart review and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for occurrence of cancer. FINDINGS: The final version of the algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 100 percent and specificity of 84.6 percent for identifying cancer. If we relied on the tumor registry alone, 47 percent of those with a history of cancer would have been missed. DISCUSSION: Using the tumor registry alone to identify a cohort of patients with prior cancer is not sufficient. In the final version of the algorithm, the sensitivity and PPV were improved when a diagnosis code for cancer was required to accompany oncology visits or chemotherapy administration. CONCLUSION: Electronic medical record (EMR) data can be used effectively in combination with data from the tumor registry to identify health plan members with a history of cancer. AcademyHealth 2016-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4862761/ /pubmed/27195308 http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1209 Text en All eGEMs publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Articles
Clarke, Christina L.
Feigelson, Heather S.
Developing an Algorithm to Identify History of Cancer Using Electronic Medical Records
title Developing an Algorithm to Identify History of Cancer Using Electronic Medical Records
title_full Developing an Algorithm to Identify History of Cancer Using Electronic Medical Records
title_fullStr Developing an Algorithm to Identify History of Cancer Using Electronic Medical Records
title_full_unstemmed Developing an Algorithm to Identify History of Cancer Using Electronic Medical Records
title_short Developing an Algorithm to Identify History of Cancer Using Electronic Medical Records
title_sort developing an algorithm to identify history of cancer using electronic medical records
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195308
http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1209
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkechristinal developinganalgorithmtoidentifyhistoryofcancerusingelectronicmedicalrecords
AT feigelsonheathers developinganalgorithmtoidentifyhistoryofcancerusingelectronicmedicalrecords