Cargando…

Preparing for the ICD-10-CM Transition: Automated Methods for Translating ICD Codes in Clinical Phenotype Definitions

BACKGROUND: The national mandate for health systems to transition from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM in October 2015 has an impact on research activities. Clinical phenotypes defined by ICD-9-CM codes need to be converted to ICD-10-CM, which has nearly four times more codes and a very different structure th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fung, Kin Wah, Richesson, Rachel, Smerek, Michelle, Pereira, Katherine C., Green, Beverly B., Patkar, Ashwin, Clowse, Megan, Bauck, Alan, Bodenreider, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AcademyHealth 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195309
http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1211
_version_ 1782431387096186880
author Fung, Kin Wah
Richesson, Rachel
Smerek, Michelle
Pereira, Katherine C.
Green, Beverly B.
Patkar, Ashwin
Clowse, Megan
Bauck, Alan
Bodenreider, Olivier
author_facet Fung, Kin Wah
Richesson, Rachel
Smerek, Michelle
Pereira, Katherine C.
Green, Beverly B.
Patkar, Ashwin
Clowse, Megan
Bauck, Alan
Bodenreider, Olivier
author_sort Fung, Kin Wah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The national mandate for health systems to transition from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM in October 2015 has an impact on research activities. Clinical phenotypes defined by ICD-9-CM codes need to be converted to ICD-10-CM, which has nearly four times more codes and a very different structure than ICD-9-CM. METHODS: We used the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) General Equivalent Maps (GEMs) to translate, using four different methods, condition-specific ICD-9-CM code sets used for pragmatic trials (n=32) into ICD-10-CM. We calculated the recall, precision, and F score of each method. We also used the ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM value sets defined for electronic quality measure as an additional evaluation of the mapping methods. RESULTS: The forward-backward mapping (FBM) method had higher precision, recall and F-score metrics than simple forward mapping (SFM). The more aggressive secondary (SM) and tertiary mapping (TM) methods resulted in higher recall but lower precision. For clinical phenotype definition, FBM was the best (F=0.67), but was close to SM (F=0.62) and TM (F=0.60), judging on the F-scores alone. The overall difference between the four methods was statistically significant (one-way ANOVA, F=5.749, p=0.001). However, pairwise comparisons between FBM, SM, and TM did not reach statistical significance. A similar trend was found for the quality measure value sets. DISCUSSION: The optimal method for using the GEMs depends on the relative importance of recall versus precision for a given use case. It appears that for clinically distinct and homogenous conditions, the recall of FBM is sufficient. The performance of all mapping methods was lower for heterogeneous conditions. Since code sets used for phenotype definition and quality measurement can be very similar, there is a possibility of cross-fertilization between the two activities. CONCLUSION: Different mapping approaches yield different collections of ICD-10-CM codes. All methods require some level of human validation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4862764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AcademyHealth
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48627642016-05-18 Preparing for the ICD-10-CM Transition: Automated Methods for Translating ICD Codes in Clinical Phenotype Definitions Fung, Kin Wah Richesson, Rachel Smerek, Michelle Pereira, Katherine C. Green, Beverly B. Patkar, Ashwin Clowse, Megan Bauck, Alan Bodenreider, Olivier EGEMS (Wash DC) Articles BACKGROUND: The national mandate for health systems to transition from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM in October 2015 has an impact on research activities. Clinical phenotypes defined by ICD-9-CM codes need to be converted to ICD-10-CM, which has nearly four times more codes and a very different structure than ICD-9-CM. METHODS: We used the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) General Equivalent Maps (GEMs) to translate, using four different methods, condition-specific ICD-9-CM code sets used for pragmatic trials (n=32) into ICD-10-CM. We calculated the recall, precision, and F score of each method. We also used the ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM value sets defined for electronic quality measure as an additional evaluation of the mapping methods. RESULTS: The forward-backward mapping (FBM) method had higher precision, recall and F-score metrics than simple forward mapping (SFM). The more aggressive secondary (SM) and tertiary mapping (TM) methods resulted in higher recall but lower precision. For clinical phenotype definition, FBM was the best (F=0.67), but was close to SM (F=0.62) and TM (F=0.60), judging on the F-scores alone. The overall difference between the four methods was statistically significant (one-way ANOVA, F=5.749, p=0.001). However, pairwise comparisons between FBM, SM, and TM did not reach statistical significance. A similar trend was found for the quality measure value sets. DISCUSSION: The optimal method for using the GEMs depends on the relative importance of recall versus precision for a given use case. It appears that for clinically distinct and homogenous conditions, the recall of FBM is sufficient. The performance of all mapping methods was lower for heterogeneous conditions. Since code sets used for phenotype definition and quality measurement can be very similar, there is a possibility of cross-fertilization between the two activities. CONCLUSION: Different mapping approaches yield different collections of ICD-10-CM codes. All methods require some level of human validation. AcademyHealth 2016-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4862764/ /pubmed/27195309 http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1211 Text en All eGEMs publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Articles
Fung, Kin Wah
Richesson, Rachel
Smerek, Michelle
Pereira, Katherine C.
Green, Beverly B.
Patkar, Ashwin
Clowse, Megan
Bauck, Alan
Bodenreider, Olivier
Preparing for the ICD-10-CM Transition: Automated Methods for Translating ICD Codes in Clinical Phenotype Definitions
title Preparing for the ICD-10-CM Transition: Automated Methods for Translating ICD Codes in Clinical Phenotype Definitions
title_full Preparing for the ICD-10-CM Transition: Automated Methods for Translating ICD Codes in Clinical Phenotype Definitions
title_fullStr Preparing for the ICD-10-CM Transition: Automated Methods for Translating ICD Codes in Clinical Phenotype Definitions
title_full_unstemmed Preparing for the ICD-10-CM Transition: Automated Methods for Translating ICD Codes in Clinical Phenotype Definitions
title_short Preparing for the ICD-10-CM Transition: Automated Methods for Translating ICD Codes in Clinical Phenotype Definitions
title_sort preparing for the icd-10-cm transition: automated methods for translating icd codes in clinical phenotype definitions
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195309
http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1211
work_keys_str_mv AT fungkinwah preparingfortheicd10cmtransitionautomatedmethodsfortranslatingicdcodesinclinicalphenotypedefinitions
AT richessonrachel preparingfortheicd10cmtransitionautomatedmethodsfortranslatingicdcodesinclinicalphenotypedefinitions
AT smerekmichelle preparingfortheicd10cmtransitionautomatedmethodsfortranslatingicdcodesinclinicalphenotypedefinitions
AT pereirakatherinec preparingfortheicd10cmtransitionautomatedmethodsfortranslatingicdcodesinclinicalphenotypedefinitions
AT greenbeverlyb preparingfortheicd10cmtransitionautomatedmethodsfortranslatingicdcodesinclinicalphenotypedefinitions
AT patkarashwin preparingfortheicd10cmtransitionautomatedmethodsfortranslatingicdcodesinclinicalphenotypedefinitions
AT clowsemegan preparingfortheicd10cmtransitionautomatedmethodsfortranslatingicdcodesinclinicalphenotypedefinitions
AT bauckalan preparingfortheicd10cmtransitionautomatedmethodsfortranslatingicdcodesinclinicalphenotypedefinitions
AT bodenreiderolivier preparingfortheicd10cmtransitionautomatedmethodsfortranslatingicdcodesinclinicalphenotypedefinitions