Cargando…

Comparison of Two Cryogenic Radiometers at NIST

Two cryogenic radiometers from NIST, one from the Optical Technology Division and the other from the Optoelectronics Division, were compared at three visible laser wavelengths. For this comparison, each radiometer calibrated two photodiode trap detectors for spectral responsivity. The calibration va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houston, Jeanne M., Livigni, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27500040
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.106.029
_version_ 1782431400568291328
author Houston, Jeanne M.
Livigni, David J.
author_facet Houston, Jeanne M.
Livigni, David J.
author_sort Houston, Jeanne M.
collection PubMed
description Two cryogenic radiometers from NIST, one from the Optical Technology Division and the other from the Optoelectronics Division, were compared at three visible laser wavelengths. For this comparison, each radiometer calibrated two photodiode trap detectors for spectral responsivity. The calibration values for the two trap detectors agreed within the expanded (k = 2) uncertainties. This paper describes the measurement and results of this comparison.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4862825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48628252016-08-05 Comparison of Two Cryogenic Radiometers at NIST Houston, Jeanne M. Livigni, David J. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol Article Two cryogenic radiometers from NIST, one from the Optical Technology Division and the other from the Optoelectronics Division, were compared at three visible laser wavelengths. For this comparison, each radiometer calibrated two photodiode trap detectors for spectral responsivity. The calibration values for the two trap detectors agreed within the expanded (k = 2) uncertainties. This paper describes the measurement and results of this comparison. [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 2001 2001-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4862825/ /pubmed/27500040 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.106.029 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ The Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology is a publication of the U.S. Government. The papers are in the public domain and are not subject to copyright in the United States. Articles from J Res may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Article
Houston, Jeanne M.
Livigni, David J.
Comparison of Two Cryogenic Radiometers at NIST
title Comparison of Two Cryogenic Radiometers at NIST
title_full Comparison of Two Cryogenic Radiometers at NIST
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Cryogenic Radiometers at NIST
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Cryogenic Radiometers at NIST
title_short Comparison of Two Cryogenic Radiometers at NIST
title_sort comparison of two cryogenic radiometers at nist
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4862825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27500040
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.106.029
work_keys_str_mv AT houstonjeannem comparisonoftwocryogenicradiometersatnist
AT livignidavidj comparisonoftwocryogenicradiometersatnist