Cargando…

Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia

Background. To compare the early outcome of combined SMILE and collagen crosslinking (SMILE Xtra) with SMILE. Method. Prospective, comparative interventional study of 21 eyes receiving SMILE Xtra using a low energy protocol and 32 control eyes receiving SMILE only. The outcomes were compared at 1, 3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ng, Alex L. K., Chan, Tommy C. Y., Cheng, George P. M., Jhanji, Vishal, Ye, Cong, Woo, Victor C. P., Lai, Jimmy S. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27239334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2672980
_version_ 1782431429405179904
author Ng, Alex L. K.
Chan, Tommy C. Y.
Cheng, George P. M.
Jhanji, Vishal
Ye, Cong
Woo, Victor C. P.
Lai, Jimmy S. M.
author_facet Ng, Alex L. K.
Chan, Tommy C. Y.
Cheng, George P. M.
Jhanji, Vishal
Ye, Cong
Woo, Victor C. P.
Lai, Jimmy S. M.
author_sort Ng, Alex L. K.
collection PubMed
description Background. To compare the early outcome of combined SMILE and collagen crosslinking (SMILE Xtra) with SMILE. Method. Prospective, comparative interventional study of 21 eyes receiving SMILE Xtra using a low energy protocol and 32 control eyes receiving SMILE only. The outcomes were compared at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results. Both groups had myopia with spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) > 4.00 D. The SMILE Xtra group had thinner preoperative central corneal thickness and residual stromal bed thickness (p < 0.021). At 6 months, no eyes lost more than 1 line in corrected distance visual acuity. The safety index was 0.96 ± 0.06 and 1.00 ± 0.00 in SMILE Xtra and control, respectively (p < 0.001). 89% and 94% of eyes were within ±0.50 D of target refraction, respectively, with the mean error in SEQ correction being −0.17 ± 0.26 D for SMILE Xtra and +0.03 ± 0.25 D for control (p = 0.021). The efficacy index was 0.88 ± 0.13 and 0.97 ± 0.06, respectively (p = 0.005). Conclusion. SMILE Xtra had good overall safety profile and predictability at 6 months. However, when compared with control, the safety index and efficacy index were statistically significantly lower in the early postoperative period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4863112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48631122016-05-29 Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia Ng, Alex L. K. Chan, Tommy C. Y. Cheng, George P. M. Jhanji, Vishal Ye, Cong Woo, Victor C. P. Lai, Jimmy S. M. J Ophthalmol Clinical Study Background. To compare the early outcome of combined SMILE and collagen crosslinking (SMILE Xtra) with SMILE. Method. Prospective, comparative interventional study of 21 eyes receiving SMILE Xtra using a low energy protocol and 32 control eyes receiving SMILE only. The outcomes were compared at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results. Both groups had myopia with spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) > 4.00 D. The SMILE Xtra group had thinner preoperative central corneal thickness and residual stromal bed thickness (p < 0.021). At 6 months, no eyes lost more than 1 line in corrected distance visual acuity. The safety index was 0.96 ± 0.06 and 1.00 ± 0.00 in SMILE Xtra and control, respectively (p < 0.001). 89% and 94% of eyes were within ±0.50 D of target refraction, respectively, with the mean error in SEQ correction being −0.17 ± 0.26 D for SMILE Xtra and +0.03 ± 0.25 D for control (p = 0.021). The efficacy index was 0.88 ± 0.13 and 0.97 ± 0.06, respectively (p = 0.005). Conclusion. SMILE Xtra had good overall safety profile and predictability at 6 months. However, when compared with control, the safety index and efficacy index were statistically significantly lower in the early postoperative period. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4863112/ /pubmed/27239334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2672980 Text en Copyright © 2016 Alex L. K. Ng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Ng, Alex L. K.
Chan, Tommy C. Y.
Cheng, George P. M.
Jhanji, Vishal
Ye, Cong
Woo, Victor C. P.
Lai, Jimmy S. M.
Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia
title Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia
title_full Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia
title_fullStr Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia
title_short Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia
title_sort comparison of the early clinical outcomes between combined small-incision lenticule extraction and collagen cross-linking versus smile for myopia
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27239334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2672980
work_keys_str_mv AT ngalexlk comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia
AT chantommycy comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia
AT chenggeorgepm comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia
AT jhanjivishal comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia
AT yecong comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia
AT woovictorcp comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia
AT laijimmysm comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia