Cargando…
Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia
Background. To compare the early outcome of combined SMILE and collagen crosslinking (SMILE Xtra) with SMILE. Method. Prospective, comparative interventional study of 21 eyes receiving SMILE Xtra using a low energy protocol and 32 control eyes receiving SMILE only. The outcomes were compared at 1, 3...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27239334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2672980 |
_version_ | 1782431429405179904 |
---|---|
author | Ng, Alex L. K. Chan, Tommy C. Y. Cheng, George P. M. Jhanji, Vishal Ye, Cong Woo, Victor C. P. Lai, Jimmy S. M. |
author_facet | Ng, Alex L. K. Chan, Tommy C. Y. Cheng, George P. M. Jhanji, Vishal Ye, Cong Woo, Victor C. P. Lai, Jimmy S. M. |
author_sort | Ng, Alex L. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. To compare the early outcome of combined SMILE and collagen crosslinking (SMILE Xtra) with SMILE. Method. Prospective, comparative interventional study of 21 eyes receiving SMILE Xtra using a low energy protocol and 32 control eyes receiving SMILE only. The outcomes were compared at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results. Both groups had myopia with spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) > 4.00 D. The SMILE Xtra group had thinner preoperative central corneal thickness and residual stromal bed thickness (p < 0.021). At 6 months, no eyes lost more than 1 line in corrected distance visual acuity. The safety index was 0.96 ± 0.06 and 1.00 ± 0.00 in SMILE Xtra and control, respectively (p < 0.001). 89% and 94% of eyes were within ±0.50 D of target refraction, respectively, with the mean error in SEQ correction being −0.17 ± 0.26 D for SMILE Xtra and +0.03 ± 0.25 D for control (p = 0.021). The efficacy index was 0.88 ± 0.13 and 0.97 ± 0.06, respectively (p = 0.005). Conclusion. SMILE Xtra had good overall safety profile and predictability at 6 months. However, when compared with control, the safety index and efficacy index were statistically significantly lower in the early postoperative period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4863112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48631122016-05-29 Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia Ng, Alex L. K. Chan, Tommy C. Y. Cheng, George P. M. Jhanji, Vishal Ye, Cong Woo, Victor C. P. Lai, Jimmy S. M. J Ophthalmol Clinical Study Background. To compare the early outcome of combined SMILE and collagen crosslinking (SMILE Xtra) with SMILE. Method. Prospective, comparative interventional study of 21 eyes receiving SMILE Xtra using a low energy protocol and 32 control eyes receiving SMILE only. The outcomes were compared at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results. Both groups had myopia with spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) > 4.00 D. The SMILE Xtra group had thinner preoperative central corneal thickness and residual stromal bed thickness (p < 0.021). At 6 months, no eyes lost more than 1 line in corrected distance visual acuity. The safety index was 0.96 ± 0.06 and 1.00 ± 0.00 in SMILE Xtra and control, respectively (p < 0.001). 89% and 94% of eyes were within ±0.50 D of target refraction, respectively, with the mean error in SEQ correction being −0.17 ± 0.26 D for SMILE Xtra and +0.03 ± 0.25 D for control (p = 0.021). The efficacy index was 0.88 ± 0.13 and 0.97 ± 0.06, respectively (p = 0.005). Conclusion. SMILE Xtra had good overall safety profile and predictability at 6 months. However, when compared with control, the safety index and efficacy index were statistically significantly lower in the early postoperative period. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4863112/ /pubmed/27239334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2672980 Text en Copyright © 2016 Alex L. K. Ng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Ng, Alex L. K. Chan, Tommy C. Y. Cheng, George P. M. Jhanji, Vishal Ye, Cong Woo, Victor C. P. Lai, Jimmy S. M. Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia |
title | Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia |
title_full | Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia |
title_short | Comparison of the Early Clinical Outcomes between Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Collagen Cross-Linking versus SMILE for Myopia |
title_sort | comparison of the early clinical outcomes between combined small-incision lenticule extraction and collagen cross-linking versus smile for myopia |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27239334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2672980 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ngalexlk comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia AT chantommycy comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia AT chenggeorgepm comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia AT jhanjivishal comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia AT yecong comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia AT woovictorcp comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia AT laijimmysm comparisonoftheearlyclinicaloutcomesbetweencombinedsmallincisionlenticuleextractionandcollagencrosslinkingversussmileformyopia |