Cargando…
Word pair classification during imagined speech using direct brain recordings
People that cannot communicate due to neurological disorders would benefit from an internal speech decoder. Here, we showed the ability to classify individual words during imagined speech from electrocorticographic signals. In a word imagery task, we used high gamma (70–150 Hz) time features with a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27165452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25803 |
_version_ | 1782431437753942016 |
---|---|
author | Martin, Stephanie Brunner, Peter Iturrate, Iñaki Millán, José del R. Schalk, Gerwin Knight, Robert T. Pasley, Brian N. |
author_facet | Martin, Stephanie Brunner, Peter Iturrate, Iñaki Millán, José del R. Schalk, Gerwin Knight, Robert T. Pasley, Brian N. |
author_sort | Martin, Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | People that cannot communicate due to neurological disorders would benefit from an internal speech decoder. Here, we showed the ability to classify individual words during imagined speech from electrocorticographic signals. In a word imagery task, we used high gamma (70–150 Hz) time features with a support vector machine model to classify individual words from a pair of words. To account for temporal irregularities during speech production, we introduced a non-linear time alignment into the SVM kernel. Classification accuracy reached 88% in a two-class classification framework (50% chance level), and average classification accuracy across fifteen word-pairs was significant across five subjects (mean = 58%; p < 0.05). We also compared classification accuracy between imagined speech, overt speech and listening. As predicted, higher classification accuracy was obtained in the listening and overt speech conditions (mean = 89% and 86%, respectively; p < 0.0001), where speech stimuli were directly presented. The results provide evidence for a neural representation for imagined words in the temporal lobe, frontal lobe and sensorimotor cortex, consistent with previous findings in speech perception and production. These data represent a proof of concept study for basic decoding of speech imagery, and delineate a number of key challenges to usage of speech imagery neural representations for clinical applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4863149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48631492016-05-23 Word pair classification during imagined speech using direct brain recordings Martin, Stephanie Brunner, Peter Iturrate, Iñaki Millán, José del R. Schalk, Gerwin Knight, Robert T. Pasley, Brian N. Sci Rep Article People that cannot communicate due to neurological disorders would benefit from an internal speech decoder. Here, we showed the ability to classify individual words during imagined speech from electrocorticographic signals. In a word imagery task, we used high gamma (70–150 Hz) time features with a support vector machine model to classify individual words from a pair of words. To account for temporal irregularities during speech production, we introduced a non-linear time alignment into the SVM kernel. Classification accuracy reached 88% in a two-class classification framework (50% chance level), and average classification accuracy across fifteen word-pairs was significant across five subjects (mean = 58%; p < 0.05). We also compared classification accuracy between imagined speech, overt speech and listening. As predicted, higher classification accuracy was obtained in the listening and overt speech conditions (mean = 89% and 86%, respectively; p < 0.0001), where speech stimuli were directly presented. The results provide evidence for a neural representation for imagined words in the temporal lobe, frontal lobe and sensorimotor cortex, consistent with previous findings in speech perception and production. These data represent a proof of concept study for basic decoding of speech imagery, and delineate a number of key challenges to usage of speech imagery neural representations for clinical applications. Nature Publishing Group 2016-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4863149/ /pubmed/27165452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25803 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Martin, Stephanie Brunner, Peter Iturrate, Iñaki Millán, José del R. Schalk, Gerwin Knight, Robert T. Pasley, Brian N. Word pair classification during imagined speech using direct brain recordings |
title | Word pair classification during imagined speech using direct brain recordings |
title_full | Word pair classification during imagined speech using direct brain recordings |
title_fullStr | Word pair classification during imagined speech using direct brain recordings |
title_full_unstemmed | Word pair classification during imagined speech using direct brain recordings |
title_short | Word pair classification during imagined speech using direct brain recordings |
title_sort | word pair classification during imagined speech using direct brain recordings |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27165452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25803 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinstephanie wordpairclassificationduringimaginedspeechusingdirectbrainrecordings AT brunnerpeter wordpairclassificationduringimaginedspeechusingdirectbrainrecordings AT iturrateinaki wordpairclassificationduringimaginedspeechusingdirectbrainrecordings AT millanjosedelr wordpairclassificationduringimaginedspeechusingdirectbrainrecordings AT schalkgerwin wordpairclassificationduringimaginedspeechusingdirectbrainrecordings AT knightrobertt wordpairclassificationduringimaginedspeechusingdirectbrainrecordings AT pasleybriann wordpairclassificationduringimaginedspeechusingdirectbrainrecordings |