Cargando…

Effect of quality of bowel preparation on quality indicators of adenoma detection rates and colonoscopy completion rates

Background and aim: Adequate bowel preparation is important for safe and effective colonoscopy. Quality indicators (QI) for colonoscopy include achieving at least 95% completion rate and an adenoma detection rate (ADR) of at least 25% in average-risk men and 15% in average-risk women aged over 50. O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rai, Tarun, Navaneethan, Udayakumar, Gohel, Tushar, Podugu, Amareshwar, Thota, Prashanthi N., Kiran, Ravi P., Lopez, Rocio, Sanaka, Madhusudhan R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25680361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gov002
_version_ 1782431445608824832
author Rai, Tarun
Navaneethan, Udayakumar
Gohel, Tushar
Podugu, Amareshwar
Thota, Prashanthi N.
Kiran, Ravi P.
Lopez, Rocio
Sanaka, Madhusudhan R.
author_facet Rai, Tarun
Navaneethan, Udayakumar
Gohel, Tushar
Podugu, Amareshwar
Thota, Prashanthi N.
Kiran, Ravi P.
Lopez, Rocio
Sanaka, Madhusudhan R.
author_sort Rai, Tarun
collection PubMed
description Background and aim: Adequate bowel preparation is important for safe and effective colonoscopy. Quality indicators (QI) for colonoscopy include achieving at least 95% completion rate and an adenoma detection rate (ADR) of at least 25% in average-risk men and 15% in average-risk women aged over 50. Our aim was to investigate the impact of bowel preparation on ADR and colonoscopy completion rates. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent colonoscopy between January 2008 and December 2009. The main outcome measurements were ADR and colonoscopy completion rates to the cecum. Results: A total of 2519 patients was included; 1030 (41.0%) had excellent preparation, 1145 (45.5%) good-, 240 (9.5%) fair-, and 104 (4.1%) poor preparation. Colonoscopy completion rates were significantly lower in patients with poor or fair preparation (72.1% and 75.4%, respectively) than in those with good and excellent preparation (99.7% and 99.9%, respectively; P < 0.001), and significantly lower than the QI of 95% (P < 0.001). ADR in men and women combined was similar in all four grades of preparation (excellent, good, fair and poor) at 24.2% vs. 26.8% vs. 32.1% vs. 22.1%, respectively; P = 0.06. All the groups had ADR above the QI (25% for men and 15% for women) with evidence of significantly higher ADR in the women with excellent or good preparation and in men with excellent, good or fair preparation. On multivariate analysis, male gender was significantly associated with increased ADR (P < 0.001), while the quality of bowel preparation did not influence ADR. Conclusions: Patients with fair and poor standards of preparation have significantly lower colonoscopy completion rates than those with excellent and good preparation. However, there was no difference in ADR between the different grades of preparation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4863185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48631852016-05-12 Effect of quality of bowel preparation on quality indicators of adenoma detection rates and colonoscopy completion rates Rai, Tarun Navaneethan, Udayakumar Gohel, Tushar Podugu, Amareshwar Thota, Prashanthi N. Kiran, Ravi P. Lopez, Rocio Sanaka, Madhusudhan R. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Original Articles Background and aim: Adequate bowel preparation is important for safe and effective colonoscopy. Quality indicators (QI) for colonoscopy include achieving at least 95% completion rate and an adenoma detection rate (ADR) of at least 25% in average-risk men and 15% in average-risk women aged over 50. Our aim was to investigate the impact of bowel preparation on ADR and colonoscopy completion rates. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent colonoscopy between January 2008 and December 2009. The main outcome measurements were ADR and colonoscopy completion rates to the cecum. Results: A total of 2519 patients was included; 1030 (41.0%) had excellent preparation, 1145 (45.5%) good-, 240 (9.5%) fair-, and 104 (4.1%) poor preparation. Colonoscopy completion rates were significantly lower in patients with poor or fair preparation (72.1% and 75.4%, respectively) than in those with good and excellent preparation (99.7% and 99.9%, respectively; P < 0.001), and significantly lower than the QI of 95% (P < 0.001). ADR in men and women combined was similar in all four grades of preparation (excellent, good, fair and poor) at 24.2% vs. 26.8% vs. 32.1% vs. 22.1%, respectively; P = 0.06. All the groups had ADR above the QI (25% for men and 15% for women) with evidence of significantly higher ADR in the women with excellent or good preparation and in men with excellent, good or fair preparation. On multivariate analysis, male gender was significantly associated with increased ADR (P < 0.001), while the quality of bowel preparation did not influence ADR. Conclusions: Patients with fair and poor standards of preparation have significantly lower colonoscopy completion rates than those with excellent and good preparation. However, there was no difference in ADR between the different grades of preparation. Oxford University Press 2016-05 2015-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4863185/ /pubmed/25680361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gov002 Text en © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press and the Digestive Science Publishing Co. Limited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rai, Tarun
Navaneethan, Udayakumar
Gohel, Tushar
Podugu, Amareshwar
Thota, Prashanthi N.
Kiran, Ravi P.
Lopez, Rocio
Sanaka, Madhusudhan R.
Effect of quality of bowel preparation on quality indicators of adenoma detection rates and colonoscopy completion rates
title Effect of quality of bowel preparation on quality indicators of adenoma detection rates and colonoscopy completion rates
title_full Effect of quality of bowel preparation on quality indicators of adenoma detection rates and colonoscopy completion rates
title_fullStr Effect of quality of bowel preparation on quality indicators of adenoma detection rates and colonoscopy completion rates
title_full_unstemmed Effect of quality of bowel preparation on quality indicators of adenoma detection rates and colonoscopy completion rates
title_short Effect of quality of bowel preparation on quality indicators of adenoma detection rates and colonoscopy completion rates
title_sort effect of quality of bowel preparation on quality indicators of adenoma detection rates and colonoscopy completion rates
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25680361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gov002
work_keys_str_mv AT raitarun effectofqualityofbowelpreparationonqualityindicatorsofadenomadetectionratesandcolonoscopycompletionrates
AT navaneethanudayakumar effectofqualityofbowelpreparationonqualityindicatorsofadenomadetectionratesandcolonoscopycompletionrates
AT goheltushar effectofqualityofbowelpreparationonqualityindicatorsofadenomadetectionratesandcolonoscopycompletionrates
AT poduguamareshwar effectofqualityofbowelpreparationonqualityindicatorsofadenomadetectionratesandcolonoscopycompletionrates
AT thotaprashanthin effectofqualityofbowelpreparationonqualityindicatorsofadenomadetectionratesandcolonoscopycompletionrates
AT kiranravip effectofqualityofbowelpreparationonqualityindicatorsofadenomadetectionratesandcolonoscopycompletionrates
AT lopezrocio effectofqualityofbowelpreparationonqualityindicatorsofadenomadetectionratesandcolonoscopycompletionrates
AT sanakamadhusudhanr effectofqualityofbowelpreparationonqualityindicatorsofadenomadetectionratesandcolonoscopycompletionrates