Cargando…

Parental and staff perspectives of NICU research procedures

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on parental perception of infant participation in minimal risk and minor increase above minimal risk research focusing on the NICU population. The study objective was to assess parental and NICU staff perceptions concerning minimal risk and minor increase above min...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freibott, Christina, Guillen, Ursula, Mackley, Amy, Locke, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27165303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0600-3
_version_ 1782431469355925504
author Freibott, Christina
Guillen, Ursula
Mackley, Amy
Locke, Robert
author_facet Freibott, Christina
Guillen, Ursula
Mackley, Amy
Locke, Robert
author_sort Freibott, Christina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are limited data on parental perception of infant participation in minimal risk and minor increase above minimal risk research focusing on the NICU population. The study objective was to assess parental and NICU staff perceptions concerning minimal risk and minor increase above minimal risk in the NICU setting. METHODS: Parents of infants and NICU staff were presented with a combination of 4 infant scenarios and 5 hypothetical research procedures. These assessed participants’ willingness to allow their infant to participate in research and their attitude towards obligation to assist future children. Linear and hierarchal linear models analyzed the association and interaction effects on the likelihood to consent to research procedures. RESULTS: Sixty parents and 30 NICU staff members were surveyed. Parents’ acceptability for each of the five research procedures ranged from 31 % to 83 %. Parent gender, age, race/ethnicity, insurance, education and history of previous child in the NICU were not associated with the likelihood to consent to the research procedures. Acceptability for each of the five research procedures among NICU staff ranged from 19 % to 98 %. There were no significant differences between NICU staff’s and parents’ responses for 4 of 5 research procedures. A minority of parents and nurses (38.3 % and 40 % respectively), compared to a majority of physicians (66.7 %), agreed or strongly agreed that parents have a responsibility to involve their children in low risk medical research in order to help future children, even if this would not help their own child. Lower agreement with obligation to help future children (p < 0.01) and higher education (p = 0.01) were associated with a decreased likelihood to consent to research procedures. CONCLUSION: In our study population, common NICU-related research procedures were considered appropriate and acceptable to a diverse group of NICU parents representing a wide range of race/ethnic and socioeconomic strata. Current regulations guiding informed consent for minimal and minor increase over minimal risk research in the NICU environment appear ethically consistent with a diverse group of parents and providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4863356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48633562016-05-12 Parental and staff perspectives of NICU research procedures Freibott, Christina Guillen, Ursula Mackley, Amy Locke, Robert BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: There are limited data on parental perception of infant participation in minimal risk and minor increase above minimal risk research focusing on the NICU population. The study objective was to assess parental and NICU staff perceptions concerning minimal risk and minor increase above minimal risk in the NICU setting. METHODS: Parents of infants and NICU staff were presented with a combination of 4 infant scenarios and 5 hypothetical research procedures. These assessed participants’ willingness to allow their infant to participate in research and their attitude towards obligation to assist future children. Linear and hierarchal linear models analyzed the association and interaction effects on the likelihood to consent to research procedures. RESULTS: Sixty parents and 30 NICU staff members were surveyed. Parents’ acceptability for each of the five research procedures ranged from 31 % to 83 %. Parent gender, age, race/ethnicity, insurance, education and history of previous child in the NICU were not associated with the likelihood to consent to the research procedures. Acceptability for each of the five research procedures among NICU staff ranged from 19 % to 98 %. There were no significant differences between NICU staff’s and parents’ responses for 4 of 5 research procedures. A minority of parents and nurses (38.3 % and 40 % respectively), compared to a majority of physicians (66.7 %), agreed or strongly agreed that parents have a responsibility to involve their children in low risk medical research in order to help future children, even if this would not help their own child. Lower agreement with obligation to help future children (p < 0.01) and higher education (p = 0.01) were associated with a decreased likelihood to consent to research procedures. CONCLUSION: In our study population, common NICU-related research procedures were considered appropriate and acceptable to a diverse group of NICU parents representing a wide range of race/ethnic and socioeconomic strata. Current regulations guiding informed consent for minimal and minor increase over minimal risk research in the NICU environment appear ethically consistent with a diverse group of parents and providers. BioMed Central 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4863356/ /pubmed/27165303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0600-3 Text en © Freibott et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Freibott, Christina
Guillen, Ursula
Mackley, Amy
Locke, Robert
Parental and staff perspectives of NICU research procedures
title Parental and staff perspectives of NICU research procedures
title_full Parental and staff perspectives of NICU research procedures
title_fullStr Parental and staff perspectives of NICU research procedures
title_full_unstemmed Parental and staff perspectives of NICU research procedures
title_short Parental and staff perspectives of NICU research procedures
title_sort parental and staff perspectives of nicu research procedures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27165303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0600-3
work_keys_str_mv AT freibottchristina parentalandstaffperspectivesofnicuresearchprocedures
AT guillenursula parentalandstaffperspectivesofnicuresearchprocedures
AT mackleyamy parentalandstaffperspectivesofnicuresearchprocedures
AT lockerobert parentalandstaffperspectivesofnicuresearchprocedures