Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study

AIM: To comparatively evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated glass ionomer cement, and triclosan-incorporated glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, glass ionomer cement t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaidka, Shipra, Somani, Rani, Singh, Deepti J., Shafat, Shazia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195231
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.181188
_version_ 1782431484819275776
author Jaidka, Shipra
Somani, Rani
Singh, Deepti J.
Shafat, Shazia
author_facet Jaidka, Shipra
Somani, Rani
Singh, Deepti J.
Shafat, Shazia
author_sort Jaidka, Shipra
collection PubMed
description AIM: To comparatively evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated glass ionomer cement, and triclosan-incorporated glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, glass ionomer cement type IX was used as a control. Chlorhexidine diacetate, and triclosan were added to glass ionomer cement type IX powder, respectively, in order to obtain 0.5, 1.25, and 2.5% concentrations of the respective experimental groups. Compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and shear bond strength were evaluated after 24 h using Instron Universal Testing Machine. The results obtained were statistically analyzed using the independent t-test, Dunnett test, and Tukey test. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement type IX (control), 0.5% triclosan-glass ionomer cement, and 0.5% chlorhexidine-glass ionomer cement. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and shear bond strength of 0.5% triclosan-glass ionomer cement and 0.5% chlorhexidine-glass ionomer cement were similar to those of the glass ionomer cement type IX, discernibly signifying that these can be considered as viable options for use in pediatric dentistry with the additional value of antimicrobial property along with physical properties within the higher acceptable range.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4863487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48634872016-05-18 Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study Jaidka, Shipra Somani, Rani Singh, Deepti J. Shafat, Shazia J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article AIM: To comparatively evaluate the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated glass ionomer cement, and triclosan-incorporated glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, glass ionomer cement type IX was used as a control. Chlorhexidine diacetate, and triclosan were added to glass ionomer cement type IX powder, respectively, in order to obtain 0.5, 1.25, and 2.5% concentrations of the respective experimental groups. Compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and shear bond strength were evaluated after 24 h using Instron Universal Testing Machine. The results obtained were statistically analyzed using the independent t-test, Dunnett test, and Tukey test. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement type IX (control), 0.5% triclosan-glass ionomer cement, and 0.5% chlorhexidine-glass ionomer cement. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that the compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and shear bond strength of 0.5% triclosan-glass ionomer cement and 0.5% chlorhexidine-glass ionomer cement were similar to those of the glass ionomer cement type IX, discernibly signifying that these can be considered as viable options for use in pediatric dentistry with the additional value of antimicrobial property along with physical properties within the higher acceptable range. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4863487/ /pubmed/27195231 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.181188 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jaidka, Shipra
Somani, Rani
Singh, Deepti J.
Shafat, Shazia
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of gic type ix, chlorhexidine-incorporated gic and triclosan-incorporated gic: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195231
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.181188
work_keys_str_mv AT jaidkashipra comparativeevaluationofcompressivestrengthdiametraltensilestrengthandshearbondstrengthofgictypeixchlorhexidineincorporatedgicandtriclosanincorporatedgicaninvitrostudy
AT somanirani comparativeevaluationofcompressivestrengthdiametraltensilestrengthandshearbondstrengthofgictypeixchlorhexidineincorporatedgicandtriclosanincorporatedgicaninvitrostudy
AT singhdeeptij comparativeevaluationofcompressivestrengthdiametraltensilestrengthandshearbondstrengthofgictypeixchlorhexidineincorporatedgicandtriclosanincorporatedgicaninvitrostudy
AT shafatshazia comparativeevaluationofcompressivestrengthdiametraltensilestrengthandshearbondstrengthofgictypeixchlorhexidineincorporatedgicandtriclosanincorporatedgicaninvitrostudy