Cargando…

The utilisation of operant delayed matching and non-matching to position for probing cognitive flexibility and working memory in mouse models of Huntington's disease

BACKGROUND: Operant behavioural testing provides a highly sensitive and automated method of exploring the behavioural deficits seen in rodent models of neurodegenerative diseases, including Huntington's disease (HD). The delayed matching to position (DMTP) and delayed non-matching to position (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yhnell, Emma, Dunnett, Stephen B., Brooks, Simon P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.08.022
_version_ 1782431493262409728
author Yhnell, Emma
Dunnett, Stephen B.
Brooks, Simon P.
author_facet Yhnell, Emma
Dunnett, Stephen B.
Brooks, Simon P.
author_sort Yhnell, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Operant behavioural testing provides a highly sensitive and automated method of exploring the behavioural deficits seen in rodent models of neurodegenerative diseases, including Huntington's disease (HD). The delayed matching to position (DMTP) and delayed non-matching to position (DNMTP) tasks probe spatial learning and working memory and when applied serially they can be used to measure reversal learning, which has been shown to be an early symptom of executive dysfunction in HD. NEW METHOD: The DMTP and DNMTP tasks were conducted in two configurations of operant apparatus; the conventional 9-hole operant apparatus, and a Skinner-like operant apparatus, to compare, contrast and optimise the DMTP and DNMTP operant protocols for use in mice. The optimised tasks were then tested in the Hdh(Q111) mouse model of HD. RESULTS: Optimisation of the operant apparatus demonstrated that the mice learned the DMTP and DNMTP tasks more rapidly and effectively in the Skinner-like apparatus configuration in comparison to the conventional 9-hole apparatus configuration. When tested in the Hdh(Q111) mouse model of HD, the DMTP and DNMTP tasks revealed significant deficits in reversal learning. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: We found that mice were capable of performing the DMTP and DNMTP tasks in both apparatus configurations, but in comparison to the 9-hole configuration, the Skinner-like configuration produced more efficient, robust and reliable results. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented here suggest that DMTP and DNMTP tasks, incorporating a reversal learning manipulation, are valid and robust methods for probing selected cognitive deficits in mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4863528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48635282016-05-30 The utilisation of operant delayed matching and non-matching to position for probing cognitive flexibility and working memory in mouse models of Huntington's disease Yhnell, Emma Dunnett, Stephen B. Brooks, Simon P. J Neurosci Methods Basic Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Operant behavioural testing provides a highly sensitive and automated method of exploring the behavioural deficits seen in rodent models of neurodegenerative diseases, including Huntington's disease (HD). The delayed matching to position (DMTP) and delayed non-matching to position (DNMTP) tasks probe spatial learning and working memory and when applied serially they can be used to measure reversal learning, which has been shown to be an early symptom of executive dysfunction in HD. NEW METHOD: The DMTP and DNMTP tasks were conducted in two configurations of operant apparatus; the conventional 9-hole operant apparatus, and a Skinner-like operant apparatus, to compare, contrast and optimise the DMTP and DNMTP operant protocols for use in mice. The optimised tasks were then tested in the Hdh(Q111) mouse model of HD. RESULTS: Optimisation of the operant apparatus demonstrated that the mice learned the DMTP and DNMTP tasks more rapidly and effectively in the Skinner-like apparatus configuration in comparison to the conventional 9-hole apparatus configuration. When tested in the Hdh(Q111) mouse model of HD, the DMTP and DNMTP tasks revealed significant deficits in reversal learning. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: We found that mice were capable of performing the DMTP and DNMTP tasks in both apparatus configurations, but in comparison to the 9-hole configuration, the Skinner-like configuration produced more efficient, robust and reliable results. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented here suggest that DMTP and DNMTP tasks, incorporating a reversal learning manipulation, are valid and robust methods for probing selected cognitive deficits in mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2016-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4863528/ /pubmed/26321735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.08.022 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Basic Neuroscience
Yhnell, Emma
Dunnett, Stephen B.
Brooks, Simon P.
The utilisation of operant delayed matching and non-matching to position for probing cognitive flexibility and working memory in mouse models of Huntington's disease
title The utilisation of operant delayed matching and non-matching to position for probing cognitive flexibility and working memory in mouse models of Huntington's disease
title_full The utilisation of operant delayed matching and non-matching to position for probing cognitive flexibility and working memory in mouse models of Huntington's disease
title_fullStr The utilisation of operant delayed matching and non-matching to position for probing cognitive flexibility and working memory in mouse models of Huntington's disease
title_full_unstemmed The utilisation of operant delayed matching and non-matching to position for probing cognitive flexibility and working memory in mouse models of Huntington's disease
title_short The utilisation of operant delayed matching and non-matching to position for probing cognitive flexibility and working memory in mouse models of Huntington's disease
title_sort utilisation of operant delayed matching and non-matching to position for probing cognitive flexibility and working memory in mouse models of huntington's disease
topic Basic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.08.022
work_keys_str_mv AT yhnellemma theutilisationofoperantdelayedmatchingandnonmatchingtopositionforprobingcognitiveflexibilityandworkingmemoryinmousemodelsofhuntingtonsdisease
AT dunnettstephenb theutilisationofoperantdelayedmatchingandnonmatchingtopositionforprobingcognitiveflexibilityandworkingmemoryinmousemodelsofhuntingtonsdisease
AT brookssimonp theutilisationofoperantdelayedmatchingandnonmatchingtopositionforprobingcognitiveflexibilityandworkingmemoryinmousemodelsofhuntingtonsdisease
AT yhnellemma utilisationofoperantdelayedmatchingandnonmatchingtopositionforprobingcognitiveflexibilityandworkingmemoryinmousemodelsofhuntingtonsdisease
AT dunnettstephenb utilisationofoperantdelayedmatchingandnonmatchingtopositionforprobingcognitiveflexibilityandworkingmemoryinmousemodelsofhuntingtonsdisease
AT brookssimonp utilisationofoperantdelayedmatchingandnonmatchingtopositionforprobingcognitiveflexibilityandworkingmemoryinmousemodelsofhuntingtonsdisease