Cargando…

Diet composition as a source of variation in experimental animal models of cancer cachexia

BACKGROUND: A variety of experimental animal models are used extensively to study mechanisms underlying cancer cachexia, and to identify potential treatments. The important potential confounding effect of dietary composition and intake used in many preclinical studies of cancer cachexia is frequentl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giles, Kaitlin, Guan, Chen, Jagoe, Thomas R., Mazurak, Vera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12058
_version_ 1782431521508950016
author Giles, Kaitlin
Guan, Chen
Jagoe, Thomas R.
Mazurak, Vera
author_facet Giles, Kaitlin
Guan, Chen
Jagoe, Thomas R.
Mazurak, Vera
author_sort Giles, Kaitlin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A variety of experimental animal models are used extensively to study mechanisms underlying cancer cachexia, and to identify potential treatments. The important potential confounding effect of dietary composition and intake used in many preclinical studies of cancer cachexia is frequently overlooked. Dietary designs applied in experimental studies should maximize the applicability to human cancer cachexia, meeting the essential requirements of the species used in the study, matched between treatment and control groups as well as also being generally similar to human consumption. METHODS: A literature review of scientific studies using animal models of cancer and cancer cachexia with dietary interventions was performed. Studies that investigated interventions using lipid sources were selected as the focus of discussion. RESULTS: The search revealed a number of nutrient intervention studies (n = 44), with the majority including n‐3 fatty acids (n = 16), mainly eicosapentaenoic acid and/or docosahexaenoic acid. A review of the literature revealed that the majority of studies do not provide information about dietary design; food intake or pair‐feeding is rarely reported. Further, there is a lack of standardization in dietary design, content, source, and overall composition in animal models of cancer cachexia. A model is proposed with the intent of guiding dietary design in preclinical studies to enable comparisons of dietary treatments within the same study, translation across different study designs, as well as application to human nutrient intakes. CONCLUSION: The potential for experimental endpoints to be affected by variations in food intake, macronutrient content, and diet composition is likely. Diet content and composition should be reported, and food intake assessed. Minimum standards for diet definition in cachexia studies would improve reproducibility of pre‐clinical studies and aid the interpretation and translation of results to humans with cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4863732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48637322016-05-27 Diet composition as a source of variation in experimental animal models of cancer cachexia Giles, Kaitlin Guan, Chen Jagoe, Thomas R. Mazurak, Vera J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Review BACKGROUND: A variety of experimental animal models are used extensively to study mechanisms underlying cancer cachexia, and to identify potential treatments. The important potential confounding effect of dietary composition and intake used in many preclinical studies of cancer cachexia is frequently overlooked. Dietary designs applied in experimental studies should maximize the applicability to human cancer cachexia, meeting the essential requirements of the species used in the study, matched between treatment and control groups as well as also being generally similar to human consumption. METHODS: A literature review of scientific studies using animal models of cancer and cancer cachexia with dietary interventions was performed. Studies that investigated interventions using lipid sources were selected as the focus of discussion. RESULTS: The search revealed a number of nutrient intervention studies (n = 44), with the majority including n‐3 fatty acids (n = 16), mainly eicosapentaenoic acid and/or docosahexaenoic acid. A review of the literature revealed that the majority of studies do not provide information about dietary design; food intake or pair‐feeding is rarely reported. Further, there is a lack of standardization in dietary design, content, source, and overall composition in animal models of cancer cachexia. A model is proposed with the intent of guiding dietary design in preclinical studies to enable comparisons of dietary treatments within the same study, translation across different study designs, as well as application to human nutrient intakes. CONCLUSION: The potential for experimental endpoints to be affected by variations in food intake, macronutrient content, and diet composition is likely. Diet content and composition should be reported, and food intake assessed. Minimum standards for diet definition in cachexia studies would improve reproducibility of pre‐clinical studies and aid the interpretation and translation of results to humans with cancer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-10-15 2016-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4863732/ /pubmed/27493865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12058 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the Society of Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review
Giles, Kaitlin
Guan, Chen
Jagoe, Thomas R.
Mazurak, Vera
Diet composition as a source of variation in experimental animal models of cancer cachexia
title Diet composition as a source of variation in experimental animal models of cancer cachexia
title_full Diet composition as a source of variation in experimental animal models of cancer cachexia
title_fullStr Diet composition as a source of variation in experimental animal models of cancer cachexia
title_full_unstemmed Diet composition as a source of variation in experimental animal models of cancer cachexia
title_short Diet composition as a source of variation in experimental animal models of cancer cachexia
title_sort diet composition as a source of variation in experimental animal models of cancer cachexia
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12058
work_keys_str_mv AT gileskaitlin dietcompositionasasourceofvariationinexperimentalanimalmodelsofcancercachexia
AT guanchen dietcompositionasasourceofvariationinexperimentalanimalmodelsofcancercachexia
AT jagoethomasr dietcompositionasasourceofvariationinexperimentalanimalmodelsofcancercachexia
AT mazurakvera dietcompositionasasourceofvariationinexperimentalanimalmodelsofcancercachexia