Cargando…

Is Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Beneficial for Sphincter Preservation in Low-Lying Rectal Cancer Patients?

The present study explored the benefit of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) for sphincter preservation in locally advanced low-lying rectal cancer patients who underwent stapled anastomosis, especially in those with deep and narrow pelvises determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, In Ja, Yu, Chang Sik, Lim, Seok-Byung, Lee, Jong Lyul, Kim, Chan Wook, Yoon, Yong Sik, Park, Seong Ho, Kim, Jin Cheon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27149445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003463
_version_ 1782431528134901760
author Park, In Ja
Yu, Chang Sik
Lim, Seok-Byung
Lee, Jong Lyul
Kim, Chan Wook
Yoon, Yong Sik
Park, Seong Ho
Kim, Jin Cheon
author_facet Park, In Ja
Yu, Chang Sik
Lim, Seok-Byung
Lee, Jong Lyul
Kim, Chan Wook
Yoon, Yong Sik
Park, Seong Ho
Kim, Jin Cheon
author_sort Park, In Ja
collection PubMed
description The present study explored the benefit of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) for sphincter preservation in locally advanced low-lying rectal cancer patients who underwent stapled anastomosis, especially in those with deep and narrow pelvises determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with locally advanced low-lying rectal cancer (≤5 cm from the anal verge) who underwent stapled anastomosis were included. Patients were categorized into two groups (PCRT+ vs. PCRT–) according to PCRT application. Patients in the PCRT+ group were matched to those in the PCRT– group according to potential confounding factors (age, gender, clinical stage, and body mass index) for sphincter preservation. Sphincter preservation, permanent stoma, and anastomosis-related complications were compared between the groups. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure 12 dimensions representing pelvic cavity depth and width with which deep and narrow pelvis was defined. The impact of PCRT on sphincter preservation and permanent stoma in pelvic dimensions defined as deep and narrow pelvis was evaluated, and factors associated with sphincter preservation and permanent stoma were analyzed. One hundred sixty-six patients were one-to-one matched between the PCRT+ and PCRT− groups. Overall, sphincter-saving surgery was performed in 66.3% and the rates were not different between the 2 groups. Anastomotic complications and permanent stoma occurred nonsignificantly more frequently in the PCRT+ group. PCRT was not associated with higher rate of sphincter preservation in all pelvic dimensions defined as deep and narrow pelvis, while PCRT was related to higher rate of permanent stoma in shorter transverse diameter and interspinous distance. On logistic regression analysis, PCRT was not shown to influence both sphincter preservation and permanent stoma, while longer transverse diameter and interspinous distance were associated with lower rate of permanent stoma. PCRT had no beneficial effect on sphincter preservation in patients with locally advanced low-lying rectal cancer who had undergone stapled anastomosis. In patients with deep and narrow pelvis, PCRT had no impact on sphincter preservation but was associated with higher rate of permanent stoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4863762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48637622016-06-01 Is Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Beneficial for Sphincter Preservation in Low-Lying Rectal Cancer Patients? Park, In Ja Yu, Chang Sik Lim, Seok-Byung Lee, Jong Lyul Kim, Chan Wook Yoon, Yong Sik Park, Seong Ho Kim, Jin Cheon Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 The present study explored the benefit of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) for sphincter preservation in locally advanced low-lying rectal cancer patients who underwent stapled anastomosis, especially in those with deep and narrow pelvises determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with locally advanced low-lying rectal cancer (≤5 cm from the anal verge) who underwent stapled anastomosis were included. Patients were categorized into two groups (PCRT+ vs. PCRT–) according to PCRT application. Patients in the PCRT+ group were matched to those in the PCRT– group according to potential confounding factors (age, gender, clinical stage, and body mass index) for sphincter preservation. Sphincter preservation, permanent stoma, and anastomosis-related complications were compared between the groups. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure 12 dimensions representing pelvic cavity depth and width with which deep and narrow pelvis was defined. The impact of PCRT on sphincter preservation and permanent stoma in pelvic dimensions defined as deep and narrow pelvis was evaluated, and factors associated with sphincter preservation and permanent stoma were analyzed. One hundred sixty-six patients were one-to-one matched between the PCRT+ and PCRT− groups. Overall, sphincter-saving surgery was performed in 66.3% and the rates were not different between the 2 groups. Anastomotic complications and permanent stoma occurred nonsignificantly more frequently in the PCRT+ group. PCRT was not associated with higher rate of sphincter preservation in all pelvic dimensions defined as deep and narrow pelvis, while PCRT was related to higher rate of permanent stoma in shorter transverse diameter and interspinous distance. On logistic regression analysis, PCRT was not shown to influence both sphincter preservation and permanent stoma, while longer transverse diameter and interspinous distance were associated with lower rate of permanent stoma. PCRT had no beneficial effect on sphincter preservation in patients with locally advanced low-lying rectal cancer who had undergone stapled anastomosis. In patients with deep and narrow pelvis, PCRT had no impact on sphincter preservation but was associated with higher rate of permanent stoma. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4863762/ /pubmed/27149445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003463 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Park, In Ja
Yu, Chang Sik
Lim, Seok-Byung
Lee, Jong Lyul
Kim, Chan Wook
Yoon, Yong Sik
Park, Seong Ho
Kim, Jin Cheon
Is Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Beneficial for Sphincter Preservation in Low-Lying Rectal Cancer Patients?
title Is Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Beneficial for Sphincter Preservation in Low-Lying Rectal Cancer Patients?
title_full Is Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Beneficial for Sphincter Preservation in Low-Lying Rectal Cancer Patients?
title_fullStr Is Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Beneficial for Sphincter Preservation in Low-Lying Rectal Cancer Patients?
title_full_unstemmed Is Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Beneficial for Sphincter Preservation in Low-Lying Rectal Cancer Patients?
title_short Is Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Beneficial for Sphincter Preservation in Low-Lying Rectal Cancer Patients?
title_sort is preoperative chemoradiotherapy beneficial for sphincter preservation in low-lying rectal cancer patients?
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27149445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003463
work_keys_str_mv AT parkinja ispreoperativechemoradiotherapybeneficialforsphincterpreservationinlowlyingrectalcancerpatients
AT yuchangsik ispreoperativechemoradiotherapybeneficialforsphincterpreservationinlowlyingrectalcancerpatients
AT limseokbyung ispreoperativechemoradiotherapybeneficialforsphincterpreservationinlowlyingrectalcancerpatients
AT leejonglyul ispreoperativechemoradiotherapybeneficialforsphincterpreservationinlowlyingrectalcancerpatients
AT kimchanwook ispreoperativechemoradiotherapybeneficialforsphincterpreservationinlowlyingrectalcancerpatients
AT yoonyongsik ispreoperativechemoradiotherapybeneficialforsphincterpreservationinlowlyingrectalcancerpatients
AT parkseongho ispreoperativechemoradiotherapybeneficialforsphincterpreservationinlowlyingrectalcancerpatients
AT kimjincheon ispreoperativechemoradiotherapybeneficialforsphincterpreservationinlowlyingrectalcancerpatients