Cargando…

A Cross-sectional Study of Current Doctors’ Performance in a Modified Version of a Medical School Admission Aptitude Test: The UKCAT

The 2-hour long United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) is used by many universities in the United Kingdom as part of their selection process for undergraduate medical and dentistry degrees. We aimed to compare the performance of senior doctors in primary and secondary care and across a range...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blackmur, James P., Lone, Nazir I., Stone, Oliver D., Webb, David J., Dhaun, Neeraj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27149449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003506
_version_ 1782431529062891520
author Blackmur, James P.
Lone, Nazir I.
Stone, Oliver D.
Webb, David J.
Dhaun, Neeraj
author_facet Blackmur, James P.
Lone, Nazir I.
Stone, Oliver D.
Webb, David J.
Dhaun, Neeraj
author_sort Blackmur, James P.
collection PubMed
description The 2-hour long United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) is used by many universities in the United Kingdom as part of their selection process for undergraduate medical and dentistry degrees. We aimed to compare the performance of senior doctors in primary and secondary care and across a range of specialties, in a modified version of the medical school entrance examination—the mUKCAT. Lay people were also included in the study. Despite its widespread use, this is the first study that examines the performance of senior clinicians in the UKCAT. The study used a prospective cross-sectional design. It used mock questions from the UKCAT website to generate an mUKCAT that was anticipated to take 15 minutes to complete. In all, 167 doctors at consultant, general practitioner (GP), or specialty trainee grade and 26 lay people took part. The overall mean mUKCAT score of all participants was 2486 (69.1%). Of the total cohort, 126 (65.3%) scored above our designated threshold of 2368 and were deemed to have passed the mUKCAT. Excluding lay people, 113 (67.7%) of the 167 doctors scored above that threshold. Medical specialty was associated with overall score (P = 0.003), with anesthetists/intensive care physicians scoring highest (n = 20, mean score 2660) and GPs scoring lowest (n = 38, mean score 2302). Academics outperformed nonacademics (mean score of academics, n = 44 vs nonacademics, n = 123: 2750 vs 2406; P < 0.001). Those clinicians in senior management positions scored lower than those in “standard” roles (mean score of senior management, n = 31 vs standard roles, n = 136: 2332 vs 2534, mean difference 202, 95% confidence interval 67–337, P = 0.004). In the situational judgement section, there was no evidence that specialty was associated with score (P = 0.15). Academics exhibited greater situational judgement than their nonacademic colleagues (academics vs nonacademics: 69.8 vs 63.6%; P = 0.01). The majority of senior clinicians passed our mUKCAT. Academics and anesthetists were found to be the best performers, with GPs and those in senior management positions performing the worst.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4863766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48637662016-06-01 A Cross-sectional Study of Current Doctors’ Performance in a Modified Version of a Medical School Admission Aptitude Test: The UKCAT Blackmur, James P. Lone, Nazir I. Stone, Oliver D. Webb, David J. Dhaun, Neeraj Medicine (Baltimore) 5400 The 2-hour long United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) is used by many universities in the United Kingdom as part of their selection process for undergraduate medical and dentistry degrees. We aimed to compare the performance of senior doctors in primary and secondary care and across a range of specialties, in a modified version of the medical school entrance examination—the mUKCAT. Lay people were also included in the study. Despite its widespread use, this is the first study that examines the performance of senior clinicians in the UKCAT. The study used a prospective cross-sectional design. It used mock questions from the UKCAT website to generate an mUKCAT that was anticipated to take 15 minutes to complete. In all, 167 doctors at consultant, general practitioner (GP), or specialty trainee grade and 26 lay people took part. The overall mean mUKCAT score of all participants was 2486 (69.1%). Of the total cohort, 126 (65.3%) scored above our designated threshold of 2368 and were deemed to have passed the mUKCAT. Excluding lay people, 113 (67.7%) of the 167 doctors scored above that threshold. Medical specialty was associated with overall score (P = 0.003), with anesthetists/intensive care physicians scoring highest (n = 20, mean score 2660) and GPs scoring lowest (n = 38, mean score 2302). Academics outperformed nonacademics (mean score of academics, n = 44 vs nonacademics, n = 123: 2750 vs 2406; P < 0.001). Those clinicians in senior management positions scored lower than those in “standard” roles (mean score of senior management, n = 31 vs standard roles, n = 136: 2332 vs 2534, mean difference 202, 95% confidence interval 67–337, P = 0.004). In the situational judgement section, there was no evidence that specialty was associated with score (P = 0.15). Academics exhibited greater situational judgement than their nonacademic colleagues (academics vs nonacademics: 69.8 vs 63.6%; P = 0.01). The majority of senior clinicians passed our mUKCAT. Academics and anesthetists were found to be the best performers, with GPs and those in senior management positions performing the worst. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4863766/ /pubmed/27149449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003506 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 5400
Blackmur, James P.
Lone, Nazir I.
Stone, Oliver D.
Webb, David J.
Dhaun, Neeraj
A Cross-sectional Study of Current Doctors’ Performance in a Modified Version of a Medical School Admission Aptitude Test: The UKCAT
title A Cross-sectional Study of Current Doctors’ Performance in a Modified Version of a Medical School Admission Aptitude Test: The UKCAT
title_full A Cross-sectional Study of Current Doctors’ Performance in a Modified Version of a Medical School Admission Aptitude Test: The UKCAT
title_fullStr A Cross-sectional Study of Current Doctors’ Performance in a Modified Version of a Medical School Admission Aptitude Test: The UKCAT
title_full_unstemmed A Cross-sectional Study of Current Doctors’ Performance in a Modified Version of a Medical School Admission Aptitude Test: The UKCAT
title_short A Cross-sectional Study of Current Doctors’ Performance in a Modified Version of a Medical School Admission Aptitude Test: The UKCAT
title_sort cross-sectional study of current doctors’ performance in a modified version of a medical school admission aptitude test: the ukcat
topic 5400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27149449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003506
work_keys_str_mv AT blackmurjamesp acrosssectionalstudyofcurrentdoctorsperformanceinamodifiedversionofamedicalschooladmissionaptitudetesttheukcat
AT lonenaziri acrosssectionalstudyofcurrentdoctorsperformanceinamodifiedversionofamedicalschooladmissionaptitudetesttheukcat
AT stoneoliverd acrosssectionalstudyofcurrentdoctorsperformanceinamodifiedversionofamedicalschooladmissionaptitudetesttheukcat
AT webbdavidj acrosssectionalstudyofcurrentdoctorsperformanceinamodifiedversionofamedicalschooladmissionaptitudetesttheukcat
AT dhaunneeraj acrosssectionalstudyofcurrentdoctorsperformanceinamodifiedversionofamedicalschooladmissionaptitudetesttheukcat
AT blackmurjamesp crosssectionalstudyofcurrentdoctorsperformanceinamodifiedversionofamedicalschooladmissionaptitudetesttheukcat
AT lonenaziri crosssectionalstudyofcurrentdoctorsperformanceinamodifiedversionofamedicalschooladmissionaptitudetesttheukcat
AT stoneoliverd crosssectionalstudyofcurrentdoctorsperformanceinamodifiedversionofamedicalschooladmissionaptitudetesttheukcat
AT webbdavidj crosssectionalstudyofcurrentdoctorsperformanceinamodifiedversionofamedicalschooladmissionaptitudetesttheukcat
AT dhaunneeraj crosssectionalstudyofcurrentdoctorsperformanceinamodifiedversionofamedicalschooladmissionaptitudetesttheukcat