Cargando…

High Count Rate Electron Probe Microanalysis

Reducing the measurement uncertainty of quantitative analyses made using electron probe microanalyzers (EPMA) requires a careful study of the individual uncertainties from each definable step of the measurement. Those steps include measuring the incident electron beam current and voltage, knowing th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geller, Joseph D., Herrington, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446749
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.107.043
_version_ 1782431546616053760
author Geller, Joseph D.
Herrington, Charles
author_facet Geller, Joseph D.
Herrington, Charles
author_sort Geller, Joseph D.
collection PubMed
description Reducing the measurement uncertainty of quantitative analyses made using electron probe microanalyzers (EPMA) requires a careful study of the individual uncertainties from each definable step of the measurement. Those steps include measuring the incident electron beam current and voltage, knowing the angle between the electron beam and the sample (takeoff angle), collecting the emitted x rays from the sample, comparing the emitted x-ray flux to known standards (to determine the k-ratio) and transformation of the k-ratio to concentration using algorithms which includes, as a minimum, the atomic number, absorption, and fluorescence corrections. This paper discusses the collection and counting of the emitted x rays, which are diffracted into the gas flow or sealed proportional x-ray detectors. The representation of the uncertainty in the number of collected x rays collected reduces as the number of counts increase. The uncertainty of the collected signal is fully described by Poisson statistics. Increasing the number of x rays collected involves either counting longer or at a higher counting rate. Counting longer means the analysis time increases and may become excessive to get to the desired uncertainty. Instrument drift also becomes an issue. Counting at higher rates has its limitations, which are a function of the detector physics and the detecting electronics. Since the beginning of EPMA analysis, analog electronics have been used to amplify and discriminate the x-ray induced ionizations within the proportional counter. This paper will discuss the use of digital electronics for this purpose. These electronics are similar to that used for energy dispersive analysis of x rays with either Si(Li) or Ge(Li) detectors except that the shaping time constants are much smaller.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4863843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48638432016-07-21 High Count Rate Electron Probe Microanalysis Geller, Joseph D. Herrington, Charles J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol Article Reducing the measurement uncertainty of quantitative analyses made using electron probe microanalyzers (EPMA) requires a careful study of the individual uncertainties from each definable step of the measurement. Those steps include measuring the incident electron beam current and voltage, knowing the angle between the electron beam and the sample (takeoff angle), collecting the emitted x rays from the sample, comparing the emitted x-ray flux to known standards (to determine the k-ratio) and transformation of the k-ratio to concentration using algorithms which includes, as a minimum, the atomic number, absorption, and fluorescence corrections. This paper discusses the collection and counting of the emitted x rays, which are diffracted into the gas flow or sealed proportional x-ray detectors. The representation of the uncertainty in the number of collected x rays collected reduces as the number of counts increase. The uncertainty of the collected signal is fully described by Poisson statistics. Increasing the number of x rays collected involves either counting longer or at a higher counting rate. Counting longer means the analysis time increases and may become excessive to get to the desired uncertainty. Instrument drift also becomes an issue. Counting at higher rates has its limitations, which are a function of the detector physics and the detecting electronics. Since the beginning of EPMA analysis, analog electronics have been used to amplify and discriminate the x-ray induced ionizations within the proportional counter. This paper will discuss the use of digital electronics for this purpose. These electronics are similar to that used for energy dispersive analysis of x rays with either Si(Li) or Ge(Li) detectors except that the shaping time constants are much smaller. [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 2002 2002-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4863843/ /pubmed/27446749 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.107.043 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ The Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology is a publication of the U.S. Government. The papers are in the public domain and are not subject to copyright in the United States. Articles from J Res may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Article
Geller, Joseph D.
Herrington, Charles
High Count Rate Electron Probe Microanalysis
title High Count Rate Electron Probe Microanalysis
title_full High Count Rate Electron Probe Microanalysis
title_fullStr High Count Rate Electron Probe Microanalysis
title_full_unstemmed High Count Rate Electron Probe Microanalysis
title_short High Count Rate Electron Probe Microanalysis
title_sort high count rate electron probe microanalysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446749
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.107.043
work_keys_str_mv AT gellerjosephd highcountrateelectronprobemicroanalysis
AT herringtoncharles highcountrateelectronprobemicroanalysis