Cargando…

A comparison of multi-echo spin-echo and triple-echo steady-state T2 mapping for in vivo evaluation of articular cartilage

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical relevance of T(2) relaxation times, measured by 3D triple-echo steady-state (3D-TESS), in knee articular cartilage compared to conventional multi-echo spin-echo T(2)-mapping. METHODS: Thirteen volunteers and ten patients with focal cartilage lesions were included i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juras, Vladimir, Bohndorf, Klaus, Heule, Rahel, Kronnerwetter, Claudia, Szomolanyi, Pavol, Hager, Benedikt, Bieri, Oliver, Zbyn, Stefan, Trattnig, Siegfried
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26334512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3979-6
_version_ 1782431559834402816
author Juras, Vladimir
Bohndorf, Klaus
Heule, Rahel
Kronnerwetter, Claudia
Szomolanyi, Pavol
Hager, Benedikt
Bieri, Oliver
Zbyn, Stefan
Trattnig, Siegfried
author_facet Juras, Vladimir
Bohndorf, Klaus
Heule, Rahel
Kronnerwetter, Claudia
Szomolanyi, Pavol
Hager, Benedikt
Bieri, Oliver
Zbyn, Stefan
Trattnig, Siegfried
author_sort Juras, Vladimir
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical relevance of T(2) relaxation times, measured by 3D triple-echo steady-state (3D-TESS), in knee articular cartilage compared to conventional multi-echo spin-echo T(2)-mapping. METHODS: Thirteen volunteers and ten patients with focal cartilage lesions were included in this prospective study. All subjects underwent 3-Tesla MRI consisting of a multi-echo multi-slice spin-echo sequence (CPMG) as a reference method for T(2) mapping, and 3D TESS with the same geometry settings, but variable acquisition times: standard (TESSs 4:35min) and quick (TESSq 2:05min). T(2) values were compared in six different regions in the femoral and tibial cartilage using a Wilcoxon signed ranks test and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). The local ethics committee approved this study, and all participants gave written informed consent. RESULTS: The mean quantitative T(2) values measured by CPMG (mean: 46±9ms) in volunteers were significantly higher compared to those measured with TESS (mean: 31±5ms) in all regions. Both methods performed similarly in patients, but CPMG provided a slightly higher difference between lesions and native cartilage (CPMG: 90ms→61ms [31%],p=0.0125;TESS 32ms→24ms [24%],p=0.0839). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-TESS provides results similar to those of a conventional multi-echo spin-echo sequence with many benefits, such as shortening of total acquisition time and insensitivity to B(1) and B(0) changes. KEY POINTS: • 3D-TESS T(2)mapping provides clinically comparable results to CPMG in shorter scan-time. • Clinical and investigational studies may benefit from high temporal resolution of 3D-TESS. • 3D-TESS T(2)values are able to differentiate between healthy and damaged cartilage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4863907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48639072016-05-25 A comparison of multi-echo spin-echo and triple-echo steady-state T2 mapping for in vivo evaluation of articular cartilage Juras, Vladimir Bohndorf, Klaus Heule, Rahel Kronnerwetter, Claudia Szomolanyi, Pavol Hager, Benedikt Bieri, Oliver Zbyn, Stefan Trattnig, Siegfried Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical relevance of T(2) relaxation times, measured by 3D triple-echo steady-state (3D-TESS), in knee articular cartilage compared to conventional multi-echo spin-echo T(2)-mapping. METHODS: Thirteen volunteers and ten patients with focal cartilage lesions were included in this prospective study. All subjects underwent 3-Tesla MRI consisting of a multi-echo multi-slice spin-echo sequence (CPMG) as a reference method for T(2) mapping, and 3D TESS with the same geometry settings, but variable acquisition times: standard (TESSs 4:35min) and quick (TESSq 2:05min). T(2) values were compared in six different regions in the femoral and tibial cartilage using a Wilcoxon signed ranks test and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). The local ethics committee approved this study, and all participants gave written informed consent. RESULTS: The mean quantitative T(2) values measured by CPMG (mean: 46±9ms) in volunteers were significantly higher compared to those measured with TESS (mean: 31±5ms) in all regions. Both methods performed similarly in patients, but CPMG provided a slightly higher difference between lesions and native cartilage (CPMG: 90ms→61ms [31%],p=0.0125;TESS 32ms→24ms [24%],p=0.0839). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-TESS provides results similar to those of a conventional multi-echo spin-echo sequence with many benefits, such as shortening of total acquisition time and insensitivity to B(1) and B(0) changes. KEY POINTS: • 3D-TESS T(2)mapping provides clinically comparable results to CPMG in shorter scan-time. • Clinical and investigational studies may benefit from high temporal resolution of 3D-TESS. • 3D-TESS T(2)values are able to differentiate between healthy and damaged cartilage. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-09-03 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4863907/ /pubmed/26334512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3979-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance
Juras, Vladimir
Bohndorf, Klaus
Heule, Rahel
Kronnerwetter, Claudia
Szomolanyi, Pavol
Hager, Benedikt
Bieri, Oliver
Zbyn, Stefan
Trattnig, Siegfried
A comparison of multi-echo spin-echo and triple-echo steady-state T2 mapping for in vivo evaluation of articular cartilage
title A comparison of multi-echo spin-echo and triple-echo steady-state T2 mapping for in vivo evaluation of articular cartilage
title_full A comparison of multi-echo spin-echo and triple-echo steady-state T2 mapping for in vivo evaluation of articular cartilage
title_fullStr A comparison of multi-echo spin-echo and triple-echo steady-state T2 mapping for in vivo evaluation of articular cartilage
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of multi-echo spin-echo and triple-echo steady-state T2 mapping for in vivo evaluation of articular cartilage
title_short A comparison of multi-echo spin-echo and triple-echo steady-state T2 mapping for in vivo evaluation of articular cartilage
title_sort comparison of multi-echo spin-echo and triple-echo steady-state t2 mapping for in vivo evaluation of articular cartilage
topic Magnetic Resonance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4863907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26334512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3979-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jurasvladimir acomparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT bohndorfklaus acomparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT heulerahel acomparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT kronnerwetterclaudia acomparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT szomolanyipavol acomparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT hagerbenedikt acomparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT bierioliver acomparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT zbynstefan acomparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT trattnigsiegfried acomparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT jurasvladimir comparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT bohndorfklaus comparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT heulerahel comparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT kronnerwetterclaudia comparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT szomolanyipavol comparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT hagerbenedikt comparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT bierioliver comparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT zbynstefan comparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage
AT trattnigsiegfried comparisonofmultiechospinechoandtripleechosteadystatet2mappingforinvivoevaluationofarticularcartilage