Cargando…

Response of Antarctic cryoconite microbial communities to light

Microbial communities on polar glacier surfaces are found dispersed on the ice surface, or concentrated in cryoconite holes and cryolakes, which are accumulations of debris covered by a layer of ice for some or all of the year. The ice lid limits the penetration of photosynthetically available radia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bagshaw, Elizabeth A., Wadham, Jemma L., Tranter, Martyn, Perkins, Rupert, Morgan, Alistair, Williamson, Christopher J., Fountain, Andrew G., Fitzsimons, Sean, Dubnick, Ashley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27095815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw076
_version_ 1782431622333726720
author Bagshaw, Elizabeth A.
Wadham, Jemma L.
Tranter, Martyn
Perkins, Rupert
Morgan, Alistair
Williamson, Christopher J.
Fountain, Andrew G.
Fitzsimons, Sean
Dubnick, Ashley
author_facet Bagshaw, Elizabeth A.
Wadham, Jemma L.
Tranter, Martyn
Perkins, Rupert
Morgan, Alistair
Williamson, Christopher J.
Fountain, Andrew G.
Fitzsimons, Sean
Dubnick, Ashley
author_sort Bagshaw, Elizabeth A.
collection PubMed
description Microbial communities on polar glacier surfaces are found dispersed on the ice surface, or concentrated in cryoconite holes and cryolakes, which are accumulations of debris covered by a layer of ice for some or all of the year. The ice lid limits the penetration of photosynthetically available radiation (PAR) to the sediment layer, since the ice attenuates up to 99% of incoming radiation. This suite of field and laboratory experiments demonstrates that PAR is an important control on primary production in cryoconite and cryolake ecosystems. Increased light intensity increased efficiency of primary production in controlled laboratory incubations of debris from the surface of Joyce Glacier, McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. However, when light intensity was increased to levels near that received on the ice surface, without the protection of an ice lid, efficiency decreased and measurements of photophysiology showed that the communities suffered light stress. The communities are therefore well adapted to low light levels. Comparison with Arctic cryoconite communities, which are typically not covered by an ice lid for the majority of the ablation season, showed that these organisms were also stressed by high light, so they must employ strategies to protect against photodamage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4864406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48644062016-05-13 Response of Antarctic cryoconite microbial communities to light Bagshaw, Elizabeth A. Wadham, Jemma L. Tranter, Martyn Perkins, Rupert Morgan, Alistair Williamson, Christopher J. Fountain, Andrew G. Fitzsimons, Sean Dubnick, Ashley FEMS Microbiol Ecol Research Article Microbial communities on polar glacier surfaces are found dispersed on the ice surface, or concentrated in cryoconite holes and cryolakes, which are accumulations of debris covered by a layer of ice for some or all of the year. The ice lid limits the penetration of photosynthetically available radiation (PAR) to the sediment layer, since the ice attenuates up to 99% of incoming radiation. This suite of field and laboratory experiments demonstrates that PAR is an important control on primary production in cryoconite and cryolake ecosystems. Increased light intensity increased efficiency of primary production in controlled laboratory incubations of debris from the surface of Joyce Glacier, McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. However, when light intensity was increased to levels near that received on the ice surface, without the protection of an ice lid, efficiency decreased and measurements of photophysiology showed that the communities suffered light stress. The communities are therefore well adapted to low light levels. Comparison with Arctic cryoconite communities, which are typically not covered by an ice lid for the majority of the ablation season, showed that these organisms were also stressed by high light, so they must employ strategies to protect against photodamage. Oxford University Press 2016-04-18 2016-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4864406/ /pubmed/27095815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw076 Text en © FEMS 2016. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bagshaw, Elizabeth A.
Wadham, Jemma L.
Tranter, Martyn
Perkins, Rupert
Morgan, Alistair
Williamson, Christopher J.
Fountain, Andrew G.
Fitzsimons, Sean
Dubnick, Ashley
Response of Antarctic cryoconite microbial communities to light
title Response of Antarctic cryoconite microbial communities to light
title_full Response of Antarctic cryoconite microbial communities to light
title_fullStr Response of Antarctic cryoconite microbial communities to light
title_full_unstemmed Response of Antarctic cryoconite microbial communities to light
title_short Response of Antarctic cryoconite microbial communities to light
title_sort response of antarctic cryoconite microbial communities to light
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27095815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw076
work_keys_str_mv AT bagshawelizabetha responseofantarcticcryoconitemicrobialcommunitiestolight
AT wadhamjemmal responseofantarcticcryoconitemicrobialcommunitiestolight
AT trantermartyn responseofantarcticcryoconitemicrobialcommunitiestolight
AT perkinsrupert responseofantarcticcryoconitemicrobialcommunitiestolight
AT morganalistair responseofantarcticcryoconitemicrobialcommunitiestolight
AT williamsonchristopherj responseofantarcticcryoconitemicrobialcommunitiestolight
AT fountainandrewg responseofantarcticcryoconitemicrobialcommunitiestolight
AT fitzsimonssean responseofantarcticcryoconitemicrobialcommunitiestolight
AT dubnickashley responseofantarcticcryoconitemicrobialcommunitiestolight