Cargando…
In Favour of Medical Dissensus: Why We Should Agree to Disagree About End‐of‐Life Decisions
End‐of‐life decision‐making is controversial. There are different views about when it is appropriate to limit life‐sustaining treatment, and about what palliative options are permissible. One approach to decisions of this nature sees consensus as crucial. Decisions to limit treatment are made only i...
Autores principales: | Wilkinson, Dominic, Truog, Robert, Savulescu, Julian |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25908398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12162 |
Ejemplares similares
-
We Should Agree to Disagree
por: Park, Joon Soo, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Current controversies and irresolvable disagreement: the case of Vincent Lambert and the role of ‘dissensus’
por: Wilkinson, Dominic, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Euthanasia: agreeing to disagree?
por: Holm, Søren
Publicado: (2010) -
Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree
por: Contreras-Tejada, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree
por: Contreras-Tejada, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)