Cargando…

A randomized control study comparing the pharyngolaryngeal morbidity of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube

INTRODUCTION: Endotracheal tube (ETT) has been associated with various pharyngolaryngeal morbidities (PLMs) following general anesthesia (GA). Laryngeal mask airway (LMA), currently the most commonly used supraglottic airway device, has several advantageous over the ETT but has been associated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venugopal, A., Jacob, Ron Mathew, Koshy, Rachel Cherian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27212745
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.174466
_version_ 1782431657607823360
author Venugopal, A.
Jacob, Ron Mathew
Koshy, Rachel Cherian
author_facet Venugopal, A.
Jacob, Ron Mathew
Koshy, Rachel Cherian
author_sort Venugopal, A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Endotracheal tube (ETT) has been associated with various pharyngolaryngeal morbidities (PLMs) following general anesthesia (GA). Laryngeal mask airway (LMA), currently the most commonly used supraglottic airway device, has several advantageous over the ETT but has been associated with varying results of PLM. The aim of our study was to compare the PLM between them and to know whether LMA is a better alternative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy American Society of Anesthesiologists Grades 1 and 2 women scheduled for elective mastectomy were included in the study, 85 each in either group, E Group (intubated with ETT) and L Group (using LMA) on a random basis. All patients received GA with controlled ventilation using a muscle relaxant. PLMs such as hoarseness, pain on phonation, sore throat, and difficulty in swallowing were documented by an interview done postoperatively. Peroperative parameters such as intubation attempts, trauma during airway device insertion, and intraoperative incidents were also analyzed. A sample size of 85 patients in each group was calculated in order to achieve a study power of 0.8 and alpha level was taken as 0.05. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16 using Chi-square test, Mann–Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test were used as nonparametric tests. A two-tailed P< 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Patients in E Group had statistically significant increased incidence of a sore throat and voice complaints whereas L Group showed a statistically significant increase of swallowing problems. There was also a significant correlation between traumatic insertion and sore throat, pain on swallowing in the L Group, which could be due to direct trauma. CONCLUSIONS: ETT was associated with an increased incidence of voice problems and sore throat whereas LMA had an increased incidence of dysphagia and odynophagia. Use of LMA changes the pharyngolaryngeal profile to a more acceptable one.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4864682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48646822016-05-20 A randomized control study comparing the pharyngolaryngeal morbidity of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube Venugopal, A. Jacob, Ron Mathew Koshy, Rachel Cherian Anesth Essays Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: Endotracheal tube (ETT) has been associated with various pharyngolaryngeal morbidities (PLMs) following general anesthesia (GA). Laryngeal mask airway (LMA), currently the most commonly used supraglottic airway device, has several advantageous over the ETT but has been associated with varying results of PLM. The aim of our study was to compare the PLM between them and to know whether LMA is a better alternative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy American Society of Anesthesiologists Grades 1 and 2 women scheduled for elective mastectomy were included in the study, 85 each in either group, E Group (intubated with ETT) and L Group (using LMA) on a random basis. All patients received GA with controlled ventilation using a muscle relaxant. PLMs such as hoarseness, pain on phonation, sore throat, and difficulty in swallowing were documented by an interview done postoperatively. Peroperative parameters such as intubation attempts, trauma during airway device insertion, and intraoperative incidents were also analyzed. A sample size of 85 patients in each group was calculated in order to achieve a study power of 0.8 and alpha level was taken as 0.05. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16 using Chi-square test, Mann–Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test were used as nonparametric tests. A two-tailed P< 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Patients in E Group had statistically significant increased incidence of a sore throat and voice complaints whereas L Group showed a statistically significant increase of swallowing problems. There was also a significant correlation between traumatic insertion and sore throat, pain on swallowing in the L Group, which could be due to direct trauma. CONCLUSIONS: ETT was associated with an increased incidence of voice problems and sore throat whereas LMA had an increased incidence of dysphagia and odynophagia. Use of LMA changes the pharyngolaryngeal profile to a more acceptable one. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4864682/ /pubmed/27212745 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.174466 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Venugopal, A.
Jacob, Ron Mathew
Koshy, Rachel Cherian
A randomized control study comparing the pharyngolaryngeal morbidity of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube
title A randomized control study comparing the pharyngolaryngeal morbidity of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube
title_full A randomized control study comparing the pharyngolaryngeal morbidity of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube
title_fullStr A randomized control study comparing the pharyngolaryngeal morbidity of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube
title_full_unstemmed A randomized control study comparing the pharyngolaryngeal morbidity of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube
title_short A randomized control study comparing the pharyngolaryngeal morbidity of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube
title_sort randomized control study comparing the pharyngolaryngeal morbidity of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27212745
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.174466
work_keys_str_mv AT venugopala arandomizedcontrolstudycomparingthepharyngolaryngealmorbidityoflaryngealmaskairwayversusendotrachealtube
AT jacobronmathew arandomizedcontrolstudycomparingthepharyngolaryngealmorbidityoflaryngealmaskairwayversusendotrachealtube
AT koshyrachelcherian arandomizedcontrolstudycomparingthepharyngolaryngealmorbidityoflaryngealmaskairwayversusendotrachealtube
AT venugopala randomizedcontrolstudycomparingthepharyngolaryngealmorbidityoflaryngealmaskairwayversusendotrachealtube
AT jacobronmathew randomizedcontrolstudycomparingthepharyngolaryngealmorbidityoflaryngealmaskairwayversusendotrachealtube
AT koshyrachelcherian randomizedcontrolstudycomparingthepharyngolaryngealmorbidityoflaryngealmaskairwayversusendotrachealtube