Cargando…
Repeat spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: A comparison between 10 mg and 12 mg doses of intrathecal hyperbaric (0.05%) bupivacaine repeated after failed spinal anesthesia: A prospective, parallel group study
BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is not a 100% successful technique. At times, despite straightforward insertion and drug administration, intrathecal anesthesia for cesarean section fails to obtain any sensory or motor block. Very few studies and literature are available regarding...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27212775 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.172725 |
_version_ | 1782431663225044992 |
---|---|
author | Bhar, Debasish RoyBasunia, Sandip Das, Anjan Chhaule, Subinay Mondal, Sudipta Kumar Bisai, Subrata Chattopadhyay, Surajit Mandal, Subrata Kumar |
author_facet | Bhar, Debasish RoyBasunia, Sandip Das, Anjan Chhaule, Subinay Mondal, Sudipta Kumar Bisai, Subrata Chattopadhyay, Surajit Mandal, Subrata Kumar |
author_sort | Bhar, Debasish |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is not a 100% successful technique. At times, despite straightforward insertion and drug administration, intrathecal anesthesia for cesarean section fails to obtain any sensory or motor block. Very few studies and literature are available regarding repeat administration of spinal anesthesia and its drug dosage, especially after first spinal failure in cesarean section lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) due to fear of the excessive spread of drug. The aim of our study is to compare the outcome between two different doses of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine repeated intrathecally after failed spinal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After taking informed consent and Ethical Committee approval this prospective, randomized single-blinded study was conducted in 100 parturients of American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II who were posted for elective LSCS and had Bromage score 0 and no sensory block even at L(4) dermatome after 10 min of first spinal anesthesia; were included in the study. Group A (n = 50) patients received 2.4 ml and Group B (n = 50) patients received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine respectively for administering repeat spinal anesthesia. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and electrocardiogram were monitored both intra- and post-operatively and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Incidence of high spinal, bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory complications, and nausea vomiting are significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B (P < 0.05). SBP, DBP, and HR were significantly low in Group A patients compared to Group B in the first 10 min (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia can be safely repeated in the cesarean section with 10 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine provided after first spinal anesthesia, the level of sensory block is below L(4) and motor power in Bromage scale is 0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4864706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48647062016-05-20 Repeat spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: A comparison between 10 mg and 12 mg doses of intrathecal hyperbaric (0.05%) bupivacaine repeated after failed spinal anesthesia: A prospective, parallel group study Bhar, Debasish RoyBasunia, Sandip Das, Anjan Chhaule, Subinay Mondal, Sudipta Kumar Bisai, Subrata Chattopadhyay, Surajit Mandal, Subrata Kumar Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is not a 100% successful technique. At times, despite straightforward insertion and drug administration, intrathecal anesthesia for cesarean section fails to obtain any sensory or motor block. Very few studies and literature are available regarding repeat administration of spinal anesthesia and its drug dosage, especially after first spinal failure in cesarean section lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) due to fear of the excessive spread of drug. The aim of our study is to compare the outcome between two different doses of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine repeated intrathecally after failed spinal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After taking informed consent and Ethical Committee approval this prospective, randomized single-blinded study was conducted in 100 parturients of American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II who were posted for elective LSCS and had Bromage score 0 and no sensory block even at L(4) dermatome after 10 min of first spinal anesthesia; were included in the study. Group A (n = 50) patients received 2.4 ml and Group B (n = 50) patients received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine respectively for administering repeat spinal anesthesia. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and electrocardiogram were monitored both intra- and post-operatively and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Incidence of high spinal, bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory complications, and nausea vomiting are significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B (P < 0.05). SBP, DBP, and HR were significantly low in Group A patients compared to Group B in the first 10 min (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia can be safely repeated in the cesarean section with 10 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine provided after first spinal anesthesia, the level of sensory block is below L(4) and motor power in Bromage scale is 0. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4864706/ /pubmed/27212775 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.172725 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bhar, Debasish RoyBasunia, Sandip Das, Anjan Chhaule, Subinay Mondal, Sudipta Kumar Bisai, Subrata Chattopadhyay, Surajit Mandal, Subrata Kumar Repeat spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: A comparison between 10 mg and 12 mg doses of intrathecal hyperbaric (0.05%) bupivacaine repeated after failed spinal anesthesia: A prospective, parallel group study |
title | Repeat spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: A comparison between 10 mg and 12 mg doses of intrathecal hyperbaric (0.05%) bupivacaine repeated after failed spinal anesthesia: A prospective, parallel group study |
title_full | Repeat spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: A comparison between 10 mg and 12 mg doses of intrathecal hyperbaric (0.05%) bupivacaine repeated after failed spinal anesthesia: A prospective, parallel group study |
title_fullStr | Repeat spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: A comparison between 10 mg and 12 mg doses of intrathecal hyperbaric (0.05%) bupivacaine repeated after failed spinal anesthesia: A prospective, parallel group study |
title_full_unstemmed | Repeat spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: A comparison between 10 mg and 12 mg doses of intrathecal hyperbaric (0.05%) bupivacaine repeated after failed spinal anesthesia: A prospective, parallel group study |
title_short | Repeat spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: A comparison between 10 mg and 12 mg doses of intrathecal hyperbaric (0.05%) bupivacaine repeated after failed spinal anesthesia: A prospective, parallel group study |
title_sort | repeat spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: a comparison between 10 mg and 12 mg doses of intrathecal hyperbaric (0.05%) bupivacaine repeated after failed spinal anesthesia: a prospective, parallel group study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27212775 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.172725 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhardebasish repeatspinalanesthesiaincesareansectionacomparisonbetween10mgand12mgdosesofintrathecalhyperbaric005bupivacainerepeatedafterfailedspinalanesthesiaaprospectiveparallelgroupstudy AT roybasuniasandip repeatspinalanesthesiaincesareansectionacomparisonbetween10mgand12mgdosesofintrathecalhyperbaric005bupivacainerepeatedafterfailedspinalanesthesiaaprospectiveparallelgroupstudy AT dasanjan repeatspinalanesthesiaincesareansectionacomparisonbetween10mgand12mgdosesofintrathecalhyperbaric005bupivacainerepeatedafterfailedspinalanesthesiaaprospectiveparallelgroupstudy AT chhaulesubinay repeatspinalanesthesiaincesareansectionacomparisonbetween10mgand12mgdosesofintrathecalhyperbaric005bupivacainerepeatedafterfailedspinalanesthesiaaprospectiveparallelgroupstudy AT mondalsudiptakumar repeatspinalanesthesiaincesareansectionacomparisonbetween10mgand12mgdosesofintrathecalhyperbaric005bupivacainerepeatedafterfailedspinalanesthesiaaprospectiveparallelgroupstudy AT bisaisubrata repeatspinalanesthesiaincesareansectionacomparisonbetween10mgand12mgdosesofintrathecalhyperbaric005bupivacainerepeatedafterfailedspinalanesthesiaaprospectiveparallelgroupstudy AT chattopadhyaysurajit repeatspinalanesthesiaincesareansectionacomparisonbetween10mgand12mgdosesofintrathecalhyperbaric005bupivacainerepeatedafterfailedspinalanesthesiaaprospectiveparallelgroupstudy AT mandalsubratakumar repeatspinalanesthesiaincesareansectionacomparisonbetween10mgand12mgdosesofintrathecalhyperbaric005bupivacainerepeatedafterfailedspinalanesthesiaaprospectiveparallelgroupstudy |