Cargando…

Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Better adjuvants for epidural analgesia are still evolving. Dexmedetomidine that is alpha-2 agonist can be used as an adjuvant in epidural analgesia and anesthesia. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine versus clonidine in combination with ropivacaine i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Soni, Pramila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27212750
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.174470
_version_ 1782431663451537408
author Soni, Pramila
author_facet Soni, Pramila
author_sort Soni, Pramila
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Better adjuvants for epidural analgesia are still evolving. Dexmedetomidine that is alpha-2 agonist can be used as an adjuvant in epidural analgesia and anesthesia. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine versus clonidine in combination with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia on intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, to find out the better adjuvant for regional anesthesia. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Randomized control trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty adult patients (18–60 years) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1/ASA 2 grade and undergoing lower abdominal and lower limbs surgeries were included and randomized into three groups of 20 patients each. Group 1 - received ropivacaine with normal saline. Group 2 - received ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine. Group 3 - received ropivacaine with clonidine. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mean and Standard deviation were calculated. All the data were analyzed using analysis of variance and Chi-square test. The value of P< 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: All the three groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, and ASA grade. There was statistically significant mean time to reach T10 sensory block level (15.8, 5.7, 9.6 min in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The maximum duration of analgesia was statistically higher in Group 2 patients (383.7 vs. 365.3 and 280.5 min in Group 3 and Group 1, respectively). The mean time to reach motor block was significantly shorter in Group 2. Side effects were comparable in all groups with statistically insignificant fall in mean arterial pressure and hypotension was noted with Group 2. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the patients receiving the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia had a faster onset and longer duration of sensory and motor blockade. Dexmedetomidine in comparison to clonidine had acceptable sedation and hemodynamic stability and minimal dose requirement make very effective adjuvant in epidural anesthesia with comparable side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4864707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48647072016-05-20 Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia Soni, Pramila Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Better adjuvants for epidural analgesia are still evolving. Dexmedetomidine that is alpha-2 agonist can be used as an adjuvant in epidural analgesia and anesthesia. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine versus clonidine in combination with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia on intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, to find out the better adjuvant for regional anesthesia. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Randomized control trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty adult patients (18–60 years) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1/ASA 2 grade and undergoing lower abdominal and lower limbs surgeries were included and randomized into three groups of 20 patients each. Group 1 - received ropivacaine with normal saline. Group 2 - received ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine. Group 3 - received ropivacaine with clonidine. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mean and Standard deviation were calculated. All the data were analyzed using analysis of variance and Chi-square test. The value of P< 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: All the three groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, and ASA grade. There was statistically significant mean time to reach T10 sensory block level (15.8, 5.7, 9.6 min in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The maximum duration of analgesia was statistically higher in Group 2 patients (383.7 vs. 365.3 and 280.5 min in Group 3 and Group 1, respectively). The mean time to reach motor block was significantly shorter in Group 2. Side effects were comparable in all groups with statistically insignificant fall in mean arterial pressure and hypotension was noted with Group 2. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the patients receiving the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia had a faster onset and longer duration of sensory and motor blockade. Dexmedetomidine in comparison to clonidine had acceptable sedation and hemodynamic stability and minimal dose requirement make very effective adjuvant in epidural anesthesia with comparable side effects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4864707/ /pubmed/27212750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.174470 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Soni, Pramila
Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia
title Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia
title_full Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia
title_fullStr Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia
title_short Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia
title_sort comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27212750
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.174470
work_keys_str_mv AT sonipramila comparativestudyforbetteradjuvantwithropivacaineinepiduralanesthesia