Cargando…
Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia
BACKGROUND: Better adjuvants for epidural analgesia are still evolving. Dexmedetomidine that is alpha-2 agonist can be used as an adjuvant in epidural analgesia and anesthesia. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine versus clonidine in combination with ropivacaine i...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27212750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.174470 |
_version_ | 1782431663451537408 |
---|---|
author | Soni, Pramila |
author_facet | Soni, Pramila |
author_sort | Soni, Pramila |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Better adjuvants for epidural analgesia are still evolving. Dexmedetomidine that is alpha-2 agonist can be used as an adjuvant in epidural analgesia and anesthesia. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine versus clonidine in combination with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia on intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, to find out the better adjuvant for regional anesthesia. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Randomized control trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty adult patients (18–60 years) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1/ASA 2 grade and undergoing lower abdominal and lower limbs surgeries were included and randomized into three groups of 20 patients each. Group 1 - received ropivacaine with normal saline. Group 2 - received ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine. Group 3 - received ropivacaine with clonidine. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mean and Standard deviation were calculated. All the data were analyzed using analysis of variance and Chi-square test. The value of P< 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: All the three groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, and ASA grade. There was statistically significant mean time to reach T10 sensory block level (15.8, 5.7, 9.6 min in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The maximum duration of analgesia was statistically higher in Group 2 patients (383.7 vs. 365.3 and 280.5 min in Group 3 and Group 1, respectively). The mean time to reach motor block was significantly shorter in Group 2. Side effects were comparable in all groups with statistically insignificant fall in mean arterial pressure and hypotension was noted with Group 2. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the patients receiving the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia had a faster onset and longer duration of sensory and motor blockade. Dexmedetomidine in comparison to clonidine had acceptable sedation and hemodynamic stability and minimal dose requirement make very effective adjuvant in epidural anesthesia with comparable side effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4864707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48647072016-05-20 Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia Soni, Pramila Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Better adjuvants for epidural analgesia are still evolving. Dexmedetomidine that is alpha-2 agonist can be used as an adjuvant in epidural analgesia and anesthesia. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine versus clonidine in combination with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia on intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, to find out the better adjuvant for regional anesthesia. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Randomized control trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty adult patients (18–60 years) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1/ASA 2 grade and undergoing lower abdominal and lower limbs surgeries were included and randomized into three groups of 20 patients each. Group 1 - received ropivacaine with normal saline. Group 2 - received ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine. Group 3 - received ropivacaine with clonidine. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mean and Standard deviation were calculated. All the data were analyzed using analysis of variance and Chi-square test. The value of P< 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: All the three groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, and ASA grade. There was statistically significant mean time to reach T10 sensory block level (15.8, 5.7, 9.6 min in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The maximum duration of analgesia was statistically higher in Group 2 patients (383.7 vs. 365.3 and 280.5 min in Group 3 and Group 1, respectively). The mean time to reach motor block was significantly shorter in Group 2. Side effects were comparable in all groups with statistically insignificant fall in mean arterial pressure and hypotension was noted with Group 2. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the patients receiving the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia had a faster onset and longer duration of sensory and motor blockade. Dexmedetomidine in comparison to clonidine had acceptable sedation and hemodynamic stability and minimal dose requirement make very effective adjuvant in epidural anesthesia with comparable side effects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4864707/ /pubmed/27212750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.174470 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Soni, Pramila Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia |
title | Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia |
title_full | Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia |
title_fullStr | Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia |
title_short | Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia |
title_sort | comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27212750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.174470 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonipramila comparativestudyforbetteradjuvantwithropivacaineinepiduralanesthesia |