Cargando…
The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients
BACKGROUND: Changes in the areola size after reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) following mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a silicon implant in primary breast cancer patients have not been well examined. This study aimed to investigate time-dependent changes in the size of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27247876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2230-5 |
_version_ | 1782431664594485248 |
---|---|
author | Nagura-Inomata, Naomi Iwahira, Yoshiko Hayashi, Naoki Komiya, Takako Takahashi, Osamu |
author_facet | Nagura-Inomata, Naomi Iwahira, Yoshiko Hayashi, Naoki Komiya, Takako Takahashi, Osamu |
author_sort | Nagura-Inomata, Naomi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Changes in the areola size after reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) following mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a silicon implant in primary breast cancer patients have not been well examined. This study aimed to investigate time-dependent changes in the size of the donor and graft NACs and to assess clinical factors influencing these changes. METHODS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients who underwent nipple-areola reconstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Nipple-areola diameter was measured immediately after the NAC reconstruction and at each follow-up visit for at least 36 months. RESULTS: The donor NAC constituted 81 % of the graft NAC at the time of operation. The size of the donor NAC gradually increased by up to 36.8 % after the operation. The size of the graft NAC showed a decrease by 4.5 % at 7 months, followed by recovery to the initial value. The ratio of the donor site size to the graft site size was increased at month 1 and then showed a gradual decrease to 1.08 at 36 months. A history of mastopexy or reduction for the donor site was independent factors associated with changes in the NAC size. CONCLUSIONS: To achieve symmetry, the diameter of the donor NAC immediately after the reconstruction should be at least 20 % smaller than that of the graft NAC, especially for patients without a history of additional operations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4864729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48647292016-05-31 The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients Nagura-Inomata, Naomi Iwahira, Yoshiko Hayashi, Naoki Komiya, Takako Takahashi, Osamu Springerplus Research BACKGROUND: Changes in the areola size after reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) following mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a silicon implant in primary breast cancer patients have not been well examined. This study aimed to investigate time-dependent changes in the size of the donor and graft NACs and to assess clinical factors influencing these changes. METHODS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients who underwent nipple-areola reconstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Nipple-areola diameter was measured immediately after the NAC reconstruction and at each follow-up visit for at least 36 months. RESULTS: The donor NAC constituted 81 % of the graft NAC at the time of operation. The size of the donor NAC gradually increased by up to 36.8 % after the operation. The size of the graft NAC showed a decrease by 4.5 % at 7 months, followed by recovery to the initial value. The ratio of the donor site size to the graft site size was increased at month 1 and then showed a gradual decrease to 1.08 at 36 months. A history of mastopexy or reduction for the donor site was independent factors associated with changes in the NAC size. CONCLUSIONS: To achieve symmetry, the diameter of the donor NAC immediately after the reconstruction should be at least 20 % smaller than that of the graft NAC, especially for patients without a history of additional operations. Springer International Publishing 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4864729/ /pubmed/27247876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2230-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Nagura-Inomata, Naomi Iwahira, Yoshiko Hayashi, Naoki Komiya, Takako Takahashi, Osamu The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients |
title | The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients |
title_full | The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients |
title_fullStr | The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients |
title_short | The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients |
title_sort | optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27247876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2230-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nagurainomatanaomi theoptimalreconstructionsizeofnippleareolacomplexfollowingbreastimplantinbreastcancerpatients AT iwahirayoshiko theoptimalreconstructionsizeofnippleareolacomplexfollowingbreastimplantinbreastcancerpatients AT hayashinaoki theoptimalreconstructionsizeofnippleareolacomplexfollowingbreastimplantinbreastcancerpatients AT komiyatakako theoptimalreconstructionsizeofnippleareolacomplexfollowingbreastimplantinbreastcancerpatients AT takahashiosamu theoptimalreconstructionsizeofnippleareolacomplexfollowingbreastimplantinbreastcancerpatients AT nagurainomatanaomi optimalreconstructionsizeofnippleareolacomplexfollowingbreastimplantinbreastcancerpatients AT iwahirayoshiko optimalreconstructionsizeofnippleareolacomplexfollowingbreastimplantinbreastcancerpatients AT hayashinaoki optimalreconstructionsizeofnippleareolacomplexfollowingbreastimplantinbreastcancerpatients AT komiyatakako optimalreconstructionsizeofnippleareolacomplexfollowingbreastimplantinbreastcancerpatients AT takahashiosamu optimalreconstructionsizeofnippleareolacomplexfollowingbreastimplantinbreastcancerpatients |