Cargando…

Managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam: two case reports

BACKGROUND: Successful wound healing depends on various factors, including exudate control, prevention of microbial contaminants, and moisture balance. We report two cases of managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam dressing. CASE PRESENTATION: In Case 1, a 2-year-old Asian g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imran, Farrah-Hani, Karim, Rahamah, Maat, Noor Hidayah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27170287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-0918-3
_version_ 1782431710869192704
author Imran, Farrah-Hani
Karim, Rahamah
Maat, Noor Hidayah
author_facet Imran, Farrah-Hani
Karim, Rahamah
Maat, Noor Hidayah
author_sort Imran, Farrah-Hani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Successful wound healing depends on various factors, including exudate control, prevention of microbial contaminants, and moisture balance. We report two cases of managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam dressing. CASE PRESENTATION: In Case 1, a 2-year-old Asian girl presented with a delayed (11 days) wound on her right leg. She sustained a thermal injury from a hot iron that was left idle on the floor. Clinical inspection revealed an infected wound with overlying eschar that traversed her knee joint. As her parents refused surgical debridement under general anesthesia, hydrotherapy and wound dressing using SMARTPORE Technology Polyurethane foam were used. Despite the delay in presentation of this linear thermal pediatric burn injury that crossed the knee joint, the patient’s response to treatment and its outcome were highly encouraging. She was cooperative and tolerated each dressing change without the need of supplemental analgesia. Her wound was healed by 24 days post-admission. In Case 2, a 25-year-old Asian man presented with a mixed thickness thermal flame burn on his left leg. On examination, the injury was a mix of deep and superficial partial thickness burn, comprising approximately 3 % of his total body surface area. SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam was used on his wound; his response to the treatment was very encouraging as the dressing facilitated physiotherapy and mobility. The patient rated the pain during dressing change as 2 on a scale of 10 and his pain score remained the same in every subsequent change. His wound showed evidence of epithelialization by day 7 post-burn. There were no adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: Managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam resulted in reduced pain during dressing changes and the successful healing of partial and mixed thickness wounds. The use of SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam dressings showed encouraging results and requires further research as a desirable management option in burn wounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4864972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48649722016-05-13 Managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam: two case reports Imran, Farrah-Hani Karim, Rahamah Maat, Noor Hidayah J Med Case Rep Case Report BACKGROUND: Successful wound healing depends on various factors, including exudate control, prevention of microbial contaminants, and moisture balance. We report two cases of managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam dressing. CASE PRESENTATION: In Case 1, a 2-year-old Asian girl presented with a delayed (11 days) wound on her right leg. She sustained a thermal injury from a hot iron that was left idle on the floor. Clinical inspection revealed an infected wound with overlying eschar that traversed her knee joint. As her parents refused surgical debridement under general anesthesia, hydrotherapy and wound dressing using SMARTPORE Technology Polyurethane foam were used. Despite the delay in presentation of this linear thermal pediatric burn injury that crossed the knee joint, the patient’s response to treatment and its outcome were highly encouraging. She was cooperative and tolerated each dressing change without the need of supplemental analgesia. Her wound was healed by 24 days post-admission. In Case 2, a 25-year-old Asian man presented with a mixed thickness thermal flame burn on his left leg. On examination, the injury was a mix of deep and superficial partial thickness burn, comprising approximately 3 % of his total body surface area. SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam was used on his wound; his response to the treatment was very encouraging as the dressing facilitated physiotherapy and mobility. The patient rated the pain during dressing change as 2 on a scale of 10 and his pain score remained the same in every subsequent change. His wound showed evidence of epithelialization by day 7 post-burn. There were no adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: Managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam resulted in reduced pain during dressing changes and the successful healing of partial and mixed thickness wounds. The use of SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam dressings showed encouraging results and requires further research as a desirable management option in burn wounds. BioMed Central 2016-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4864972/ /pubmed/27170287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-0918-3 Text en © Imran et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Imran, Farrah-Hani
Karim, Rahamah
Maat, Noor Hidayah
Managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam: two case reports
title Managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam: two case reports
title_full Managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam: two case reports
title_fullStr Managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam: two case reports
title_full_unstemmed Managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam: two case reports
title_short Managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam: two case reports
title_sort managing burn wounds with smartpore technology polyurethane foam: two case reports
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27170287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-0918-3
work_keys_str_mv AT imranfarrahhani managingburnwoundswithsmartporetechnologypolyurethanefoamtwocasereports
AT karimrahamah managingburnwoundswithsmartporetechnologypolyurethanefoamtwocasereports
AT maatnoorhidayah managingburnwoundswithsmartporetechnologypolyurethanefoamtwocasereports