Cargando…

The feasibility of progressive resistance training in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility of executing a randomized controlled trial of progressive resistance training (PRT) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: Women with PCOS were randomized to an experimental (PRT) group or a no-exercise (usual care) control group. The PRT gro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vizza, Lisa, Smith, Caroline A., Swaraj, Soji, Agho, Kingsley, Cheema, Birinder S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4865007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27175282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-016-0039-8
_version_ 1782431713171865600
author Vizza, Lisa
Smith, Caroline A.
Swaraj, Soji
Agho, Kingsley
Cheema, Birinder S.
author_facet Vizza, Lisa
Smith, Caroline A.
Swaraj, Soji
Agho, Kingsley
Cheema, Birinder S.
author_sort Vizza, Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility of executing a randomized controlled trial of progressive resistance training (PRT) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: Women with PCOS were randomized to an experimental (PRT) group or a no-exercise (usual care) control group. The PRT group was prescribed two supervised and two unsupervised (home-based) training sessions per week for 12 weeks. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and attrition, adherence, adverse events, and completion of assessments. Secondary outcomes, collected pre and post intervention, included a range of pertinent physiological, functional and psychological measures. RESULTS: Fifteen participants were randomised into the PRT group (n = 8) or control group (n = 7); five women (n = 2 in PRT group and n = 3 in control group) withdrew from the study. The most successful recruitment sources were Facebook (40 %) and online advertisement (27 %), while least successful methods were referrals by clinicians, colleagues and flyers. In the PRT group, attendance to supervised sessions was higher (95 %; standard deviation ±6 %) compared to unsupervised sessions (51 %; standard deviation ±28 %). No adverse events were attributed to PRT. Change in menstrual cycle status was not significantly different between groups over time (p = 0.503). However, the PRT group significantly increased body weight (p = 0.01), BMI (p = 0.04), lean mass (p = 0.01), fat-free mass (p = 0.005) and lower body strength (p = 0.03), while reducing waist circumference (p = 0.03) and HbA(1c) (p = 0.033) versus the control group. The PRT group also significantly improved across several domains of disease-specific and general health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety and exercise self-efficacy. CONCLUSION: A randomized controlled trial of PRT in PCOS would be feasible, and this mode of exercise may elicit a therapeutic effect on clinically important outcomes in this cohort. The success of a large-scale trial required to confirm these findings would be contingent on addressing the feasibility hurdles identified in this study with respect to recruitment, attrition, compliance, and collection of standardized clinical data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; ACTRN12614000517673 Registered 15 May 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4865007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48650072016-05-13 The feasibility of progressive resistance training in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial Vizza, Lisa Smith, Caroline A. Swaraj, Soji Agho, Kingsley Cheema, Birinder S. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility of executing a randomized controlled trial of progressive resistance training (PRT) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: Women with PCOS were randomized to an experimental (PRT) group or a no-exercise (usual care) control group. The PRT group was prescribed two supervised and two unsupervised (home-based) training sessions per week for 12 weeks. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and attrition, adherence, adverse events, and completion of assessments. Secondary outcomes, collected pre and post intervention, included a range of pertinent physiological, functional and psychological measures. RESULTS: Fifteen participants were randomised into the PRT group (n = 8) or control group (n = 7); five women (n = 2 in PRT group and n = 3 in control group) withdrew from the study. The most successful recruitment sources were Facebook (40 %) and online advertisement (27 %), while least successful methods were referrals by clinicians, colleagues and flyers. In the PRT group, attendance to supervised sessions was higher (95 %; standard deviation ±6 %) compared to unsupervised sessions (51 %; standard deviation ±28 %). No adverse events were attributed to PRT. Change in menstrual cycle status was not significantly different between groups over time (p = 0.503). However, the PRT group significantly increased body weight (p = 0.01), BMI (p = 0.04), lean mass (p = 0.01), fat-free mass (p = 0.005) and lower body strength (p = 0.03), while reducing waist circumference (p = 0.03) and HbA(1c) (p = 0.033) versus the control group. The PRT group also significantly improved across several domains of disease-specific and general health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety and exercise self-efficacy. CONCLUSION: A randomized controlled trial of PRT in PCOS would be feasible, and this mode of exercise may elicit a therapeutic effect on clinically important outcomes in this cohort. The success of a large-scale trial required to confirm these findings would be contingent on addressing the feasibility hurdles identified in this study with respect to recruitment, attrition, compliance, and collection of standardized clinical data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; ACTRN12614000517673 Registered 15 May 2014. BioMed Central 2016-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4865007/ /pubmed/27175282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-016-0039-8 Text en © Vizza et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vizza, Lisa
Smith, Caroline A.
Swaraj, Soji
Agho, Kingsley
Cheema, Birinder S.
The feasibility of progressive resistance training in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title The feasibility of progressive resistance training in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full The feasibility of progressive resistance training in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The feasibility of progressive resistance training in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The feasibility of progressive resistance training in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_short The feasibility of progressive resistance training in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_sort feasibility of progressive resistance training in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4865007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27175282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-016-0039-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vizzalisa thefeasibilityofprogressiveresistancetraininginwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndromeapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT smithcarolinea thefeasibilityofprogressiveresistancetraininginwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndromeapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT swarajsoji thefeasibilityofprogressiveresistancetraininginwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndromeapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aghokingsley thefeasibilityofprogressiveresistancetraininginwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndromeapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cheemabirinders thefeasibilityofprogressiveresistancetraininginwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndromeapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vizzalisa feasibilityofprogressiveresistancetraininginwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndromeapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT smithcarolinea feasibilityofprogressiveresistancetraininginwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndromeapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT swarajsoji feasibilityofprogressiveresistancetraininginwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndromeapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aghokingsley feasibilityofprogressiveresistancetraininginwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndromeapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cheemabirinders feasibilityofprogressiveresistancetraininginwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndromeapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial