Cargando…
Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception
BACKGROUND: In von Schiller’s Stroboscopic Alternative Motion (SAM) stimulus two visually presented diagonal dot pairs, located on the corners of an imaginary rectangle, alternate with each other and induce either horizontal, vertical or, rarely, rotational motion percepts. SAM motion perception can...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4865082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27171276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152736 |
_version_ | 1782431724628606976 |
---|---|
author | Liaci, Emanuela Bach, Michael Tebartz van Elst, Ludger Heinrich, Sven P. Kornmeier, Jürgen |
author_facet | Liaci, Emanuela Bach, Michael Tebartz van Elst, Ludger Heinrich, Sven P. Kornmeier, Jürgen |
author_sort | Liaci, Emanuela |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In von Schiller’s Stroboscopic Alternative Motion (SAM) stimulus two visually presented diagonal dot pairs, located on the corners of an imaginary rectangle, alternate with each other and induce either horizontal, vertical or, rarely, rotational motion percepts. SAM motion perception can be described by a psychometric function of the dot aspect ratio (“AR”, i.e. the relation between vertical and horizontal dot distances). Further, with equal horizontal and vertical dot distances (AR = 1) perception is biased towards vertical motion. In a series of five experiments, we presented tactile SAM versions and studied the role of AR and of different reference frames for the perception of tactile apparent motion. METHODS: We presented tactile SAM stimuli and varied the ARs, while participants reported the perceived motion directions. Pairs of vibration stimulators were attached to the participants’ forearms and stimulator distances were varied within and between forearms. We compared straight and rotated forearm conditions with each other in order to disentangle the roles of exogenous and endogenous reference frames. RESULTS: Increasing the tactile SAM’s AR biased perception towards vertical motion, but the effect was weak compared to the visual modality. We found no horizontal disambiguation, even for very small tactile ARs. A forearm rotation by 90° kept the vertical bias, even though it was now coupled with small ARs. A 45° rotation condition with crossed forearms, however, evoked a strong horizontal motion bias. DISCUSSION: Existing approaches to explain the visual SAM bias fail to explain the current tactile results. Particularly puzzling is the strong horizontal bias in the crossed-forearm conditions. In the case of tactile apparent motion, there seem to be no fixed priority rule for perceptual disambiguation. Rather the weighting of available evidence seems to depend on the degree of stimulus ambiguity, the current situation and on the perceptual strategy of the individual observer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4865082 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48650822016-05-26 Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception Liaci, Emanuela Bach, Michael Tebartz van Elst, Ludger Heinrich, Sven P. Kornmeier, Jürgen PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In von Schiller’s Stroboscopic Alternative Motion (SAM) stimulus two visually presented diagonal dot pairs, located on the corners of an imaginary rectangle, alternate with each other and induce either horizontal, vertical or, rarely, rotational motion percepts. SAM motion perception can be described by a psychometric function of the dot aspect ratio (“AR”, i.e. the relation between vertical and horizontal dot distances). Further, with equal horizontal and vertical dot distances (AR = 1) perception is biased towards vertical motion. In a series of five experiments, we presented tactile SAM versions and studied the role of AR and of different reference frames for the perception of tactile apparent motion. METHODS: We presented tactile SAM stimuli and varied the ARs, while participants reported the perceived motion directions. Pairs of vibration stimulators were attached to the participants’ forearms and stimulator distances were varied within and between forearms. We compared straight and rotated forearm conditions with each other in order to disentangle the roles of exogenous and endogenous reference frames. RESULTS: Increasing the tactile SAM’s AR biased perception towards vertical motion, but the effect was weak compared to the visual modality. We found no horizontal disambiguation, even for very small tactile ARs. A forearm rotation by 90° kept the vertical bias, even though it was now coupled with small ARs. A 45° rotation condition with crossed forearms, however, evoked a strong horizontal motion bias. DISCUSSION: Existing approaches to explain the visual SAM bias fail to explain the current tactile results. Particularly puzzling is the strong horizontal bias in the crossed-forearm conditions. In the case of tactile apparent motion, there seem to be no fixed priority rule for perceptual disambiguation. Rather the weighting of available evidence seems to depend on the degree of stimulus ambiguity, the current situation and on the perceptual strategy of the individual observer. Public Library of Science 2016-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4865082/ /pubmed/27171276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152736 Text en © 2016 Liaci et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liaci, Emanuela Bach, Michael Tebartz van Elst, Ludger Heinrich, Sven P. Kornmeier, Jürgen Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception |
title | Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception |
title_full | Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception |
title_fullStr | Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception |
title_full_unstemmed | Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception |
title_short | Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception |
title_sort | ambiguity in tactile apparent motion perception |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4865082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27171276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liaciemanuela ambiguityintactileapparentmotionperception AT bachmichael ambiguityintactileapparentmotionperception AT tebartzvanelstludger ambiguityintactileapparentmotionperception AT heinrichsvenp ambiguityintactileapparentmotionperception AT kornmeierjurgen ambiguityintactileapparentmotionperception |