Cargando…

Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception

BACKGROUND: In von Schiller’s Stroboscopic Alternative Motion (SAM) stimulus two visually presented diagonal dot pairs, located on the corners of an imaginary rectangle, alternate with each other and induce either horizontal, vertical or, rarely, rotational motion percepts. SAM motion perception can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liaci, Emanuela, Bach, Michael, Tebartz van Elst, Ludger, Heinrich, Sven P., Kornmeier, Jürgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4865082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27171276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152736
_version_ 1782431724628606976
author Liaci, Emanuela
Bach, Michael
Tebartz van Elst, Ludger
Heinrich, Sven P.
Kornmeier, Jürgen
author_facet Liaci, Emanuela
Bach, Michael
Tebartz van Elst, Ludger
Heinrich, Sven P.
Kornmeier, Jürgen
author_sort Liaci, Emanuela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In von Schiller’s Stroboscopic Alternative Motion (SAM) stimulus two visually presented diagonal dot pairs, located on the corners of an imaginary rectangle, alternate with each other and induce either horizontal, vertical or, rarely, rotational motion percepts. SAM motion perception can be described by a psychometric function of the dot aspect ratio (“AR”, i.e. the relation between vertical and horizontal dot distances). Further, with equal horizontal and vertical dot distances (AR = 1) perception is biased towards vertical motion. In a series of five experiments, we presented tactile SAM versions and studied the role of AR and of different reference frames for the perception of tactile apparent motion. METHODS: We presented tactile SAM stimuli and varied the ARs, while participants reported the perceived motion directions. Pairs of vibration stimulators were attached to the participants’ forearms and stimulator distances were varied within and between forearms. We compared straight and rotated forearm conditions with each other in order to disentangle the roles of exogenous and endogenous reference frames. RESULTS: Increasing the tactile SAM’s AR biased perception towards vertical motion, but the effect was weak compared to the visual modality. We found no horizontal disambiguation, even for very small tactile ARs. A forearm rotation by 90° kept the vertical bias, even though it was now coupled with small ARs. A 45° rotation condition with crossed forearms, however, evoked a strong horizontal motion bias. DISCUSSION: Existing approaches to explain the visual SAM bias fail to explain the current tactile results. Particularly puzzling is the strong horizontal bias in the crossed-forearm conditions. In the case of tactile apparent motion, there seem to be no fixed priority rule for perceptual disambiguation. Rather the weighting of available evidence seems to depend on the degree of stimulus ambiguity, the current situation and on the perceptual strategy of the individual observer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4865082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48650822016-05-26 Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception Liaci, Emanuela Bach, Michael Tebartz van Elst, Ludger Heinrich, Sven P. Kornmeier, Jürgen PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In von Schiller’s Stroboscopic Alternative Motion (SAM) stimulus two visually presented diagonal dot pairs, located on the corners of an imaginary rectangle, alternate with each other and induce either horizontal, vertical or, rarely, rotational motion percepts. SAM motion perception can be described by a psychometric function of the dot aspect ratio (“AR”, i.e. the relation between vertical and horizontal dot distances). Further, with equal horizontal and vertical dot distances (AR = 1) perception is biased towards vertical motion. In a series of five experiments, we presented tactile SAM versions and studied the role of AR and of different reference frames for the perception of tactile apparent motion. METHODS: We presented tactile SAM stimuli and varied the ARs, while participants reported the perceived motion directions. Pairs of vibration stimulators were attached to the participants’ forearms and stimulator distances were varied within and between forearms. We compared straight and rotated forearm conditions with each other in order to disentangle the roles of exogenous and endogenous reference frames. RESULTS: Increasing the tactile SAM’s AR biased perception towards vertical motion, but the effect was weak compared to the visual modality. We found no horizontal disambiguation, even for very small tactile ARs. A forearm rotation by 90° kept the vertical bias, even though it was now coupled with small ARs. A 45° rotation condition with crossed forearms, however, evoked a strong horizontal motion bias. DISCUSSION: Existing approaches to explain the visual SAM bias fail to explain the current tactile results. Particularly puzzling is the strong horizontal bias in the crossed-forearm conditions. In the case of tactile apparent motion, there seem to be no fixed priority rule for perceptual disambiguation. Rather the weighting of available evidence seems to depend on the degree of stimulus ambiguity, the current situation and on the perceptual strategy of the individual observer. Public Library of Science 2016-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4865082/ /pubmed/27171276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152736 Text en © 2016 Liaci et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liaci, Emanuela
Bach, Michael
Tebartz van Elst, Ludger
Heinrich, Sven P.
Kornmeier, Jürgen
Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception
title Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception
title_full Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception
title_fullStr Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception
title_full_unstemmed Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception
title_short Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception
title_sort ambiguity in tactile apparent motion perception
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4865082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27171276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152736
work_keys_str_mv AT liaciemanuela ambiguityintactileapparentmotionperception
AT bachmichael ambiguityintactileapparentmotionperception
AT tebartzvanelstludger ambiguityintactileapparentmotionperception
AT heinrichsvenp ambiguityintactileapparentmotionperception
AT kornmeierjurgen ambiguityintactileapparentmotionperception