Cargando…

Adding Papillomacular Bundle Measurements to Standard Optical Coherence Tomography Does Not Increase Sensitivity to Detect Prior Optic Neuritis in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

PURPOSE: To improve the detection of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning in multiple sclerosis (MS), a special peripapillary ring scanning algorithm (N-site RNFL, N-RNFL) was developed for spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). In contrast to the standard protocol (ST-RNFL) sca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laible, Mona, Jarius, Sven, Mackensen, Friedericke, Schmidt-Bacher, Annette, Platten, Michael, Haas, Jürgen, Albrecht, Philipp, Wildemann, Brigitte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4865166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27171375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155322
_version_ 1782431743358271488
author Laible, Mona
Jarius, Sven
Mackensen, Friedericke
Schmidt-Bacher, Annette
Platten, Michael
Haas, Jürgen
Albrecht, Philipp
Wildemann, Brigitte
author_facet Laible, Mona
Jarius, Sven
Mackensen, Friedericke
Schmidt-Bacher, Annette
Platten, Michael
Haas, Jürgen
Albrecht, Philipp
Wildemann, Brigitte
author_sort Laible, Mona
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To improve the detection of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning in multiple sclerosis (MS), a special peripapillary ring scanning algorithm (N-site RNFL, N-RNFL) was developed for spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). In contrast to the standard protocol (ST-RNFL) scanning starts nasally, not temporally, and provides an additional sector of analysis, the papillomacular bundle (PMB). We aimed to ascertain whether the temporal RNFL differs between the two techniques, whether N-RNFL is more sensitive than ST-RNFL to detect previous optic neuritis (ON), and whether analyzing the PMB adds additional sensitivity. Furthermore, we investigated whether RNFL is associated with disease severity and/or disease duration. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional case-control study of 38 patients with MS, of whom 24 had a history of ON, and 40 healthy controls (HC). Subjects with ON within the previous 6 months were excluded. Records included clinical characteristics, visual evoked potentials (VEP), and SD-OCT in both techniques. RESULTS: In a total of 73 evaluable MS eyes, temporal N-RNFL was abnormal in 17.8%, temporal ST-RNFL in 19.2%, and the PMB-RNFL in 21.9%. In ON eyes, the sensitivity of temporal N-RNFL and ST-RNFL did not differ significantly (37.0%/33.3%, p = 0.556). The sensitivity of VEP was 85.2%. RNFL thickness was associated with disease severity in all eyes, with and without a history of ON, and with disease duration. CONCLUSION: The two OCT techniques detected previous ON with similar sensitivity, but the sensitivity of VEPs was superior to that of both N-RNFL and ST-RNFL. Our results indicate that the widely used ST-RNFL technique is appropriate for peripapillary RNFL measurements in MS patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4865166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48651662016-05-26 Adding Papillomacular Bundle Measurements to Standard Optical Coherence Tomography Does Not Increase Sensitivity to Detect Prior Optic Neuritis in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Laible, Mona Jarius, Sven Mackensen, Friedericke Schmidt-Bacher, Annette Platten, Michael Haas, Jürgen Albrecht, Philipp Wildemann, Brigitte PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To improve the detection of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning in multiple sclerosis (MS), a special peripapillary ring scanning algorithm (N-site RNFL, N-RNFL) was developed for spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). In contrast to the standard protocol (ST-RNFL) scanning starts nasally, not temporally, and provides an additional sector of analysis, the papillomacular bundle (PMB). We aimed to ascertain whether the temporal RNFL differs between the two techniques, whether N-RNFL is more sensitive than ST-RNFL to detect previous optic neuritis (ON), and whether analyzing the PMB adds additional sensitivity. Furthermore, we investigated whether RNFL is associated with disease severity and/or disease duration. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional case-control study of 38 patients with MS, of whom 24 had a history of ON, and 40 healthy controls (HC). Subjects with ON within the previous 6 months were excluded. Records included clinical characteristics, visual evoked potentials (VEP), and SD-OCT in both techniques. RESULTS: In a total of 73 evaluable MS eyes, temporal N-RNFL was abnormal in 17.8%, temporal ST-RNFL in 19.2%, and the PMB-RNFL in 21.9%. In ON eyes, the sensitivity of temporal N-RNFL and ST-RNFL did not differ significantly (37.0%/33.3%, p = 0.556). The sensitivity of VEP was 85.2%. RNFL thickness was associated with disease severity in all eyes, with and without a history of ON, and with disease duration. CONCLUSION: The two OCT techniques detected previous ON with similar sensitivity, but the sensitivity of VEPs was superior to that of both N-RNFL and ST-RNFL. Our results indicate that the widely used ST-RNFL technique is appropriate for peripapillary RNFL measurements in MS patients. Public Library of Science 2016-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4865166/ /pubmed/27171375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155322 Text en © 2016 Laible et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Laible, Mona
Jarius, Sven
Mackensen, Friedericke
Schmidt-Bacher, Annette
Platten, Michael
Haas, Jürgen
Albrecht, Philipp
Wildemann, Brigitte
Adding Papillomacular Bundle Measurements to Standard Optical Coherence Tomography Does Not Increase Sensitivity to Detect Prior Optic Neuritis in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
title Adding Papillomacular Bundle Measurements to Standard Optical Coherence Tomography Does Not Increase Sensitivity to Detect Prior Optic Neuritis in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
title_full Adding Papillomacular Bundle Measurements to Standard Optical Coherence Tomography Does Not Increase Sensitivity to Detect Prior Optic Neuritis in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
title_fullStr Adding Papillomacular Bundle Measurements to Standard Optical Coherence Tomography Does Not Increase Sensitivity to Detect Prior Optic Neuritis in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Adding Papillomacular Bundle Measurements to Standard Optical Coherence Tomography Does Not Increase Sensitivity to Detect Prior Optic Neuritis in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
title_short Adding Papillomacular Bundle Measurements to Standard Optical Coherence Tomography Does Not Increase Sensitivity to Detect Prior Optic Neuritis in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
title_sort adding papillomacular bundle measurements to standard optical coherence tomography does not increase sensitivity to detect prior optic neuritis in patients with multiple sclerosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4865166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27171375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155322
work_keys_str_mv AT laiblemona addingpapillomacularbundlemeasurementstostandardopticalcoherencetomographydoesnotincreasesensitivitytodetectprioropticneuritisinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT jariussven addingpapillomacularbundlemeasurementstostandardopticalcoherencetomographydoesnotincreasesensitivitytodetectprioropticneuritisinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT mackensenfriedericke addingpapillomacularbundlemeasurementstostandardopticalcoherencetomographydoesnotincreasesensitivitytodetectprioropticneuritisinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT schmidtbacherannette addingpapillomacularbundlemeasurementstostandardopticalcoherencetomographydoesnotincreasesensitivitytodetectprioropticneuritisinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT plattenmichael addingpapillomacularbundlemeasurementstostandardopticalcoherencetomographydoesnotincreasesensitivitytodetectprioropticneuritisinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT haasjurgen addingpapillomacularbundlemeasurementstostandardopticalcoherencetomographydoesnotincreasesensitivitytodetectprioropticneuritisinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT albrechtphilipp addingpapillomacularbundlemeasurementstostandardopticalcoherencetomographydoesnotincreasesensitivitytodetectprioropticneuritisinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT wildemannbrigitte addingpapillomacularbundlemeasurementstostandardopticalcoherencetomographydoesnotincreasesensitivitytodetectprioropticneuritisinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis