Cargando…

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are generally assumed to be concentrated in poor populations, but evidence on this remains scattered. We describe within-country socioeconomic inequalities in nine NTDs listed in the London Declaration for intensified control and/or elimination: lymphat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houweling, Tanja A. J., Karim-Kos, Henrike E., Kulik, Margarete C., Stolk, Wilma A., Haagsma, Juanita A., Lenk, Edeltraud J., Richardus, Jan Hendrik, de Vlas, Sake J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4865383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27171166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004546
_version_ 1782431778113323008
author Houweling, Tanja A. J.
Karim-Kos, Henrike E.
Kulik, Margarete C.
Stolk, Wilma A.
Haagsma, Juanita A.
Lenk, Edeltraud J.
Richardus, Jan Hendrik
de Vlas, Sake J.
author_facet Houweling, Tanja A. J.
Karim-Kos, Henrike E.
Kulik, Margarete C.
Stolk, Wilma A.
Haagsma, Juanita A.
Lenk, Edeltraud J.
Richardus, Jan Hendrik
de Vlas, Sake J.
author_sort Houweling, Tanja A. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are generally assumed to be concentrated in poor populations, but evidence on this remains scattered. We describe within-country socioeconomic inequalities in nine NTDs listed in the London Declaration for intensified control and/or elimination: lymphatic filariasis (LF), onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH), trachoma, Chagas’ disease, human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), leprosy, and visceral leishmaniasis (VL). METHODOLOGY: We conducted a systematic literature review, including publications between 2004–2013 found in Embase, Medline (OvidSP), Cochrane Central, Web of Science, Popline, Lilacs, and Scielo. We included publications in international peer-reviewed journals on studies concerning the top 20 countries in terms of the burden of the NTD under study. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We identified 5,516 publications, of which 93 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 59 papers reported substantial and statistically significant socioeconomic inequalities in NTD distribution, with higher odds of infection or disease among poor and less-educated people compared with better-off groups. The findings were mixed in 23 studies, and 11 studies showed no substantial or statistically significant inequality. Most information was available for STH, VL, schistosomiasis, and, to a lesser extent, for trachoma. For the other NTDs, evidence on their socioeconomic distribution was scarce. The magnitude of inequality varied, but often, the odds of infection or disease were twice as high among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups compared with better-off strata. Inequalities often took the form of a gradient, with higher odds of infection or disease each step down the socioeconomic hierarchy. Notwithstanding these inequalities, the prevalence of some NTDs was sometimes also high among better-off groups in some highly endemic areas. CONCLUSIONS: While recent evidence on socioeconomic inequalities is scarce for most individual NTDs, for some, there is considerable evidence of substantially higher odds of infection or disease among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. NTD control activities as proposed in the London Declaration, when set up in a way that they reach the most in need, will benefit the poorest populations in poor countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4865383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48653832016-05-26 Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review Houweling, Tanja A. J. Karim-Kos, Henrike E. Kulik, Margarete C. Stolk, Wilma A. Haagsma, Juanita A. Lenk, Edeltraud J. Richardus, Jan Hendrik de Vlas, Sake J. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Review BACKGROUND: Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are generally assumed to be concentrated in poor populations, but evidence on this remains scattered. We describe within-country socioeconomic inequalities in nine NTDs listed in the London Declaration for intensified control and/or elimination: lymphatic filariasis (LF), onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH), trachoma, Chagas’ disease, human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), leprosy, and visceral leishmaniasis (VL). METHODOLOGY: We conducted a systematic literature review, including publications between 2004–2013 found in Embase, Medline (OvidSP), Cochrane Central, Web of Science, Popline, Lilacs, and Scielo. We included publications in international peer-reviewed journals on studies concerning the top 20 countries in terms of the burden of the NTD under study. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We identified 5,516 publications, of which 93 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 59 papers reported substantial and statistically significant socioeconomic inequalities in NTD distribution, with higher odds of infection or disease among poor and less-educated people compared with better-off groups. The findings were mixed in 23 studies, and 11 studies showed no substantial or statistically significant inequality. Most information was available for STH, VL, schistosomiasis, and, to a lesser extent, for trachoma. For the other NTDs, evidence on their socioeconomic distribution was scarce. The magnitude of inequality varied, but often, the odds of infection or disease were twice as high among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups compared with better-off strata. Inequalities often took the form of a gradient, with higher odds of infection or disease each step down the socioeconomic hierarchy. Notwithstanding these inequalities, the prevalence of some NTDs was sometimes also high among better-off groups in some highly endemic areas. CONCLUSIONS: While recent evidence on socioeconomic inequalities is scarce for most individual NTDs, for some, there is considerable evidence of substantially higher odds of infection or disease among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. NTD control activities as proposed in the London Declaration, when set up in a way that they reach the most in need, will benefit the poorest populations in poor countries. Public Library of Science 2016-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4865383/ /pubmed/27171166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004546 Text en © 2016 Houweling et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Houweling, Tanja A. J.
Karim-Kos, Henrike E.
Kulik, Margarete C.
Stolk, Wilma A.
Haagsma, Juanita A.
Lenk, Edeltraud J.
Richardus, Jan Hendrik
de Vlas, Sake J.
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review
title Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review
title_full Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review
title_short Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review
title_sort socioeconomic inequalities in neglected tropical diseases: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4865383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27171166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004546
work_keys_str_mv AT houwelingtanjaaj socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT karimkoshenrikee socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT kulikmargaretec socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT stolkwilmaa socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT haagsmajuanitaa socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT lenkedeltraudj socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT richardusjanhendrik socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT devlassakej socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview