Cargando…
Comparison of Microwave Versus Conventional Decalcification of Teeth Using Three Different Decalcifying Solutions
BACKGROUND: In routine histopathology, decalcification of teeth is an essential and important step during tissue processing. The present study was attempted to decalcify teeth using microwave method and to compare it with conventional decalcification method. AIM: To compare microwave decalcification...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4866380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27365920 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.180791 |
_version_ | 1782431908543594496 |
---|---|
author | Srinivasyaiah, Archana Nitin, Priyanka Hegde, Usha |
author_facet | Srinivasyaiah, Archana Nitin, Priyanka Hegde, Usha |
author_sort | Srinivasyaiah, Archana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In routine histopathology, decalcification of teeth is an essential and important step during tissue processing. The present study was attempted to decalcify teeth using microwave method and to compare it with conventional decalcification method. AIM: To compare microwave decalcification with conventional decalcification method with respect to the speed of decalcification, preservation of tissue structure, and efficacy of staining. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 72 single-rooted premolars were used for both conventional and microwave decalcification methods. Three different types of decalcifying agents at 5% and 7% were used. Decalcifying agents included nitric acid, formic acid, and trichloroacetic acid, each at 5% and 7%. About 6 teeth were included in each category and were decalcified by both conventional and microwave method. After decalcification, all the teeth were examined macroscopically and microscopically. Cramer's V-test was used to determine the statistical significance. RESULTS: The results have shown that microwave method using 5% and 7% nitric acid were the fastest. Structural details and good staining characteristics were better in teeth decalcified by 5% nitric acid and 5% trichloroacetic acid by both the methods. CONCLUSIONS: 5% nitric acid by microwave method proved to be the best decalcifying agent as it was fast and gave good structural details and staining characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4866380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48663802016-07-01 Comparison of Microwave Versus Conventional Decalcification of Teeth Using Three Different Decalcifying Solutions Srinivasyaiah, Archana Nitin, Priyanka Hegde, Usha J Lab Physicians Original Article BACKGROUND: In routine histopathology, decalcification of teeth is an essential and important step during tissue processing. The present study was attempted to decalcify teeth using microwave method and to compare it with conventional decalcification method. AIM: To compare microwave decalcification with conventional decalcification method with respect to the speed of decalcification, preservation of tissue structure, and efficacy of staining. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 72 single-rooted premolars were used for both conventional and microwave decalcification methods. Three different types of decalcifying agents at 5% and 7% were used. Decalcifying agents included nitric acid, formic acid, and trichloroacetic acid, each at 5% and 7%. About 6 teeth were included in each category and were decalcified by both conventional and microwave method. After decalcification, all the teeth were examined macroscopically and microscopically. Cramer's V-test was used to determine the statistical significance. RESULTS: The results have shown that microwave method using 5% and 7% nitric acid were the fastest. Structural details and good staining characteristics were better in teeth decalcified by 5% nitric acid and 5% trichloroacetic acid by both the methods. CONCLUSIONS: 5% nitric acid by microwave method proved to be the best decalcifying agent as it was fast and gave good structural details and staining characteristics. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4866380/ /pubmed/27365920 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.180791 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Laboratory Physicians http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Srinivasyaiah, Archana Nitin, Priyanka Hegde, Usha Comparison of Microwave Versus Conventional Decalcification of Teeth Using Three Different Decalcifying Solutions |
title | Comparison of Microwave Versus Conventional Decalcification of Teeth Using Three Different Decalcifying Solutions |
title_full | Comparison of Microwave Versus Conventional Decalcification of Teeth Using Three Different Decalcifying Solutions |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Microwave Versus Conventional Decalcification of Teeth Using Three Different Decalcifying Solutions |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Microwave Versus Conventional Decalcification of Teeth Using Three Different Decalcifying Solutions |
title_short | Comparison of Microwave Versus Conventional Decalcification of Teeth Using Three Different Decalcifying Solutions |
title_sort | comparison of microwave versus conventional decalcification of teeth using three different decalcifying solutions |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4866380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27365920 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.180791 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT srinivasyaiaharchana comparisonofmicrowaveversusconventionaldecalcificationofteethusingthreedifferentdecalcifyingsolutions AT nitinpriyanka comparisonofmicrowaveversusconventionaldecalcificationofteethusingthreedifferentdecalcifyingsolutions AT hegdeusha comparisonofmicrowaveversusconventionaldecalcificationofteethusingthreedifferentdecalcifyingsolutions |