Cargando…

A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment uptake globally is low. A barrier to treatment is the necessity to attend specialists, usually in a tertiary hospital. We investigate the literature to assess the effect of providing HCV treatment in the community on treatment uptake and cure. METHODS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wade, Amanda J., Veronese, Vanessa, Hellard, Margaret E., Doyle, Joseph S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4867528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1548-5
_version_ 1782432037363253248
author Wade, Amanda J.
Veronese, Vanessa
Hellard, Margaret E.
Doyle, Joseph S.
author_facet Wade, Amanda J.
Veronese, Vanessa
Hellard, Margaret E.
Doyle, Joseph S.
author_sort Wade, Amanda J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment uptake globally is low. A barrier to treatment is the necessity to attend specialists, usually in a tertiary hospital. We investigate the literature to assess the effect of providing HCV treatment in the community on treatment uptake and cure. METHODS: Three databases were searched for studies that contained a comparison between HCV treatment uptake or sustained virologic response (SVR) in a community site and a tertiary site. Treatment was with standard interferon with or without ribavirin, or pegylated interferon and ribavirin. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Thirteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Six studies measured treatment uptake; three demonstrated an increase in uptake at the community site, two demonstrated similar rates between sites and one demonstrated decreased uptake at the community site. Nine studies measured SVR; four demonstrated higher SVR rates in the community, four demonstrated similar SVR rates, and one demonstrated inferior SVR rates in the community compared to the tertiary site. CONCLUSION: The data available supports the efficacy of HCV treatment in the community, and the potential for community based treatment to increase treatment uptake. Whilst further studies are required, these findings highlight the potential benefit of providing community based HCV care – benefits that should be realised as interferon-free therapy become available. (PROSPERO registration number CRD42015025505). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1548-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4867528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48675282016-05-31 A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment Wade, Amanda J. Veronese, Vanessa Hellard, Margaret E. Doyle, Joseph S. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment uptake globally is low. A barrier to treatment is the necessity to attend specialists, usually in a tertiary hospital. We investigate the literature to assess the effect of providing HCV treatment in the community on treatment uptake and cure. METHODS: Three databases were searched for studies that contained a comparison between HCV treatment uptake or sustained virologic response (SVR) in a community site and a tertiary site. Treatment was with standard interferon with or without ribavirin, or pegylated interferon and ribavirin. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Thirteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Six studies measured treatment uptake; three demonstrated an increase in uptake at the community site, two demonstrated similar rates between sites and one demonstrated decreased uptake at the community site. Nine studies measured SVR; four demonstrated higher SVR rates in the community, four demonstrated similar SVR rates, and one demonstrated inferior SVR rates in the community compared to the tertiary site. CONCLUSION: The data available supports the efficacy of HCV treatment in the community, and the potential for community based treatment to increase treatment uptake. Whilst further studies are required, these findings highlight the potential benefit of providing community based HCV care – benefits that should be realised as interferon-free therapy become available. (PROSPERO registration number CRD42015025505). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1548-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4867528/ /pubmed/27184661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1548-5 Text en © Wade et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wade, Amanda J.
Veronese, Vanessa
Hellard, Margaret E.
Doyle, Joseph S.
A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment
title A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment
title_full A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment
title_fullStr A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment
title_short A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment
title_sort systematic review of community based hepatitis c treatment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4867528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1548-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wadeamandaj asystematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment
AT veronesevanessa asystematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment
AT hellardmargarete asystematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment
AT doylejosephs asystematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment
AT wadeamandaj systematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment
AT veronesevanessa systematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment
AT hellardmargarete systematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment
AT doylejosephs systematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment