Cargando…
A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment uptake globally is low. A barrier to treatment is the necessity to attend specialists, usually in a tertiary hospital. We investigate the literature to assess the effect of providing HCV treatment in the community on treatment uptake and cure. METHODS: T...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4867528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1548-5 |
_version_ | 1782432037363253248 |
---|---|
author | Wade, Amanda J. Veronese, Vanessa Hellard, Margaret E. Doyle, Joseph S. |
author_facet | Wade, Amanda J. Veronese, Vanessa Hellard, Margaret E. Doyle, Joseph S. |
author_sort | Wade, Amanda J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment uptake globally is low. A barrier to treatment is the necessity to attend specialists, usually in a tertiary hospital. We investigate the literature to assess the effect of providing HCV treatment in the community on treatment uptake and cure. METHODS: Three databases were searched for studies that contained a comparison between HCV treatment uptake or sustained virologic response (SVR) in a community site and a tertiary site. Treatment was with standard interferon with or without ribavirin, or pegylated interferon and ribavirin. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Thirteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Six studies measured treatment uptake; three demonstrated an increase in uptake at the community site, two demonstrated similar rates between sites and one demonstrated decreased uptake at the community site. Nine studies measured SVR; four demonstrated higher SVR rates in the community, four demonstrated similar SVR rates, and one demonstrated inferior SVR rates in the community compared to the tertiary site. CONCLUSION: The data available supports the efficacy of HCV treatment in the community, and the potential for community based treatment to increase treatment uptake. Whilst further studies are required, these findings highlight the potential benefit of providing community based HCV care – benefits that should be realised as interferon-free therapy become available. (PROSPERO registration number CRD42015025505). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1548-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4867528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48675282016-05-31 A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment Wade, Amanda J. Veronese, Vanessa Hellard, Margaret E. Doyle, Joseph S. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment uptake globally is low. A barrier to treatment is the necessity to attend specialists, usually in a tertiary hospital. We investigate the literature to assess the effect of providing HCV treatment in the community on treatment uptake and cure. METHODS: Three databases were searched for studies that contained a comparison between HCV treatment uptake or sustained virologic response (SVR) in a community site and a tertiary site. Treatment was with standard interferon with or without ribavirin, or pegylated interferon and ribavirin. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Thirteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Six studies measured treatment uptake; three demonstrated an increase in uptake at the community site, two demonstrated similar rates between sites and one demonstrated decreased uptake at the community site. Nine studies measured SVR; four demonstrated higher SVR rates in the community, four demonstrated similar SVR rates, and one demonstrated inferior SVR rates in the community compared to the tertiary site. CONCLUSION: The data available supports the efficacy of HCV treatment in the community, and the potential for community based treatment to increase treatment uptake. Whilst further studies are required, these findings highlight the potential benefit of providing community based HCV care – benefits that should be realised as interferon-free therapy become available. (PROSPERO registration number CRD42015025505). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1548-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4867528/ /pubmed/27184661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1548-5 Text en © Wade et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wade, Amanda J. Veronese, Vanessa Hellard, Margaret E. Doyle, Joseph S. A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment |
title | A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment |
title_full | A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment |
title_short | A systematic review of community based hepatitis C treatment |
title_sort | systematic review of community based hepatitis c treatment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4867528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1548-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wadeamandaj asystematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment AT veronesevanessa asystematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment AT hellardmargarete asystematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment AT doylejosephs asystematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment AT wadeamandaj systematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment AT veronesevanessa systematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment AT hellardmargarete systematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment AT doylejosephs systematicreviewofcommunitybasedhepatitisctreatment |