Cargando…

A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators

Objective: To investigate the barriers and facilitators of an effective implementation of an outcome monitoring and feedback system in a UK National Health Service psychological therapy service. Method: An outcome monitoring system was introduced in two services. Enhanced feedback was given to thera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucock, Mike, Halstead, Jeremy, Leach, Chris, Barkham, Michael, Tucker, Samantha, Randal, Chloe, Middleton, Joanne, Khan, Wajid, Catlow, Hannah, Waters, Emma, Saxon, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4867876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26436605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1051163
_version_ 1782432102862553088
author Lucock, Mike
Halstead, Jeremy
Leach, Chris
Barkham, Michael
Tucker, Samantha
Randal, Chloe
Middleton, Joanne
Khan, Wajid
Catlow, Hannah
Waters, Emma
Saxon, David
author_facet Lucock, Mike
Halstead, Jeremy
Leach, Chris
Barkham, Michael
Tucker, Samantha
Randal, Chloe
Middleton, Joanne
Khan, Wajid
Catlow, Hannah
Waters, Emma
Saxon, David
author_sort Lucock, Mike
collection PubMed
description Objective: To investigate the barriers and facilitators of an effective implementation of an outcome monitoring and feedback system in a UK National Health Service psychological therapy service. Method: An outcome monitoring system was introduced in two services. Enhanced feedback was given to therapists after session 4. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used, including questionnaires for therapists and patients. Thematic analysis was carried out on written and verbal feedback from therapists. Analysis of patient outcomes for 202 episodes of therapy was compared with benchmark data of 136 episodes of therapy for which feedback was not given to therapists. Results: Themes influencing the feasibility and acceptability of the feedback system were the extent to which therapists integrated the measures and feedback into the therapy, availability of administrative support, information technology, and complexity of the service. There were low levels of therapist actions resulting from the feedback, including discussing the feedback in supervision and with patients. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility and acceptability of setting up a routine system in a complex service, but a number of challenges and barriers have to be overcome and therapist differences are apparent. More research on implementation and effectiveness is needed in diverse clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4867876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48678762016-05-23 A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators Lucock, Mike Halstead, Jeremy Leach, Chris Barkham, Michael Tucker, Samantha Randal, Chloe Middleton, Joanne Khan, Wajid Catlow, Hannah Waters, Emma Saxon, David Psychother Res Original Articles Objective: To investigate the barriers and facilitators of an effective implementation of an outcome monitoring and feedback system in a UK National Health Service psychological therapy service. Method: An outcome monitoring system was introduced in two services. Enhanced feedback was given to therapists after session 4. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used, including questionnaires for therapists and patients. Thematic analysis was carried out on written and verbal feedback from therapists. Analysis of patient outcomes for 202 episodes of therapy was compared with benchmark data of 136 episodes of therapy for which feedback was not given to therapists. Results: Themes influencing the feasibility and acceptability of the feedback system were the extent to which therapists integrated the measures and feedback into the therapy, availability of administrative support, information technology, and complexity of the service. There were low levels of therapist actions resulting from the feedback, including discussing the feedback in supervision and with patients. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility and acceptability of setting up a routine system in a complex service, but a number of challenges and barriers have to be overcome and therapist differences are apparent. More research on implementation and effectiveness is needed in diverse clinical settings. Routledge 2015-11-02 2015-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4867876/ /pubmed/26436605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1051163 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lucock, Mike
Halstead, Jeremy
Leach, Chris
Barkham, Michael
Tucker, Samantha
Randal, Chloe
Middleton, Joanne
Khan, Wajid
Catlow, Hannah
Waters, Emma
Saxon, David
A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators
title A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators
title_full A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators
title_fullStr A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators
title_full_unstemmed A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators
title_short A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators
title_sort mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: barriers and facilitators
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4867876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26436605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1051163
work_keys_str_mv AT lucockmike amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT halsteadjeremy amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT leachchris amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT barkhammichael amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT tuckersamantha amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT randalchloe amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT middletonjoanne amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT khanwajid amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT catlowhannah amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT watersemma amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT saxondavid amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT lucockmike mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT halsteadjeremy mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT leachchris mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT barkhammichael mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT tuckersamantha mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT randalchloe mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT middletonjoanne mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT khanwajid mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT catlowhannah mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT watersemma mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators
AT saxondavid mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators