Cargando…
A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators
Objective: To investigate the barriers and facilitators of an effective implementation of an outcome monitoring and feedback system in a UK National Health Service psychological therapy service. Method: An outcome monitoring system was introduced in two services. Enhanced feedback was given to thera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4867876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26436605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1051163 |
_version_ | 1782432102862553088 |
---|---|
author | Lucock, Mike Halstead, Jeremy Leach, Chris Barkham, Michael Tucker, Samantha Randal, Chloe Middleton, Joanne Khan, Wajid Catlow, Hannah Waters, Emma Saxon, David |
author_facet | Lucock, Mike Halstead, Jeremy Leach, Chris Barkham, Michael Tucker, Samantha Randal, Chloe Middleton, Joanne Khan, Wajid Catlow, Hannah Waters, Emma Saxon, David |
author_sort | Lucock, Mike |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To investigate the barriers and facilitators of an effective implementation of an outcome monitoring and feedback system in a UK National Health Service psychological therapy service. Method: An outcome monitoring system was introduced in two services. Enhanced feedback was given to therapists after session 4. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used, including questionnaires for therapists and patients. Thematic analysis was carried out on written and verbal feedback from therapists. Analysis of patient outcomes for 202 episodes of therapy was compared with benchmark data of 136 episodes of therapy for which feedback was not given to therapists. Results: Themes influencing the feasibility and acceptability of the feedback system were the extent to which therapists integrated the measures and feedback into the therapy, availability of administrative support, information technology, and complexity of the service. There were low levels of therapist actions resulting from the feedback, including discussing the feedback in supervision and with patients. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility and acceptability of setting up a routine system in a complex service, but a number of challenges and barriers have to be overcome and therapist differences are apparent. More research on implementation and effectiveness is needed in diverse clinical settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4867876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48678762016-05-23 A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators Lucock, Mike Halstead, Jeremy Leach, Chris Barkham, Michael Tucker, Samantha Randal, Chloe Middleton, Joanne Khan, Wajid Catlow, Hannah Waters, Emma Saxon, David Psychother Res Original Articles Objective: To investigate the barriers and facilitators of an effective implementation of an outcome monitoring and feedback system in a UK National Health Service psychological therapy service. Method: An outcome monitoring system was introduced in two services. Enhanced feedback was given to therapists after session 4. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used, including questionnaires for therapists and patients. Thematic analysis was carried out on written and verbal feedback from therapists. Analysis of patient outcomes for 202 episodes of therapy was compared with benchmark data of 136 episodes of therapy for which feedback was not given to therapists. Results: Themes influencing the feasibility and acceptability of the feedback system were the extent to which therapists integrated the measures and feedback into the therapy, availability of administrative support, information technology, and complexity of the service. There were low levels of therapist actions resulting from the feedback, including discussing the feedback in supervision and with patients. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility and acceptability of setting up a routine system in a complex service, but a number of challenges and barriers have to be overcome and therapist differences are apparent. More research on implementation and effectiveness is needed in diverse clinical settings. Routledge 2015-11-02 2015-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4867876/ /pubmed/26436605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1051163 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Lucock, Mike Halstead, Jeremy Leach, Chris Barkham, Michael Tucker, Samantha Randal, Chloe Middleton, Joanne Khan, Wajid Catlow, Hannah Waters, Emma Saxon, David A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators |
title | A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators |
title_full | A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators |
title_fullStr | A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators |
title_full_unstemmed | A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators |
title_short | A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators |
title_sort | mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: barriers and facilitators |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4867876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26436605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1051163 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lucockmike amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT halsteadjeremy amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT leachchris amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT barkhammichael amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT tuckersamantha amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT randalchloe amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT middletonjoanne amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT khanwajid amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT catlowhannah amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT watersemma amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT saxondavid amixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT lucockmike mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT halsteadjeremy mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT leachchris mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT barkhammichael mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT tuckersamantha mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT randalchloe mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT middletonjoanne mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT khanwajid mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT catlowhannah mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT watersemma mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators AT saxondavid mixedmethodinvestigationofpatientmonitoringandenhancedfeedbackinroutinepracticebarriersandfacilitators |